Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
47 votes
4 answers
16k views

What is the physical meaning of the connection and the curvature tensor?

Regarding general relativity: What is the physical meaning of the Christoffel symbol ($\Gamma^i_{\ jk}$)? What are the (preferably physical) differences between the Riemann curvature tensor ($R^i_{\ ...
Sklivvz's user avatar
  • 13.7k
39 votes
5 answers
47k views

Why is the covariant derivative of the metric tensor zero?

I've consulted several books for the explanation of why $$\nabla _{\mu}g_{\alpha \beta} = 0,$$ and hence derive the relation between metric tensor and affine connection $\Gamma ^{\sigma}_{\mu \beta}...
Aftnix's user avatar
  • 929
68 votes
6 answers
48k views

Laplace operator's interpretation

What is your interpretation of Laplace operator? When evaluating Laplacian of some scalar field at a given point one can get a value. What does this value tell us about the field or it's behaviour in ...
Džuris's user avatar
  • 3,217
13 votes
1 answer
2k views

Geometric meaning of spin connection

A very short question: Does the spin connection that we encounter in General Relativity $$\omega_{\mu,ab}$$ have a geometric meaning? I am supposing it does because it comes from mathematical terms ...
PhilosophicalPhysics's user avatar
24 votes
4 answers
14k views

Why is the covariant derivative of the determinant of the metric zero?

This question, metric determinant and its partial and covariant derivative, seems to indicate $$\nabla_a \sqrt{g}=0.$$ Why is this the case? I've always learned that $$\nabla_a f= \partial_a f,$$ ...
Hans Schmuber's user avatar
20 votes
3 answers
22k views

D'Alembertian for a scalar field

I have read that the D'Alembertian for a scalar field is $$ \Box = g^{\nu\mu}\nabla_\nu\nabla_\mu = \frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_\mu (\sqrt{-g}\partial^\mu). $$ Exactly when is this correct? Only for $...
innisfree's user avatar
  • 15.3k
107 votes
4 answers
11k views

Why does nature favour the Laplacian?

The three-dimensional Laplacian can be defined as $$\nabla^2=\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial y^2}+\frac{\partial^2}{\partial z^2}.$$ Expressed in spherical coordinates, it ...
Sam Jaques's user avatar
  • 1,357
24 votes
5 answers
16k views

How do I calculate the perturbations to the metric determinant?

I am trying to calculate $\sqrt{-g}$ in terms of a background metric and metric perturbations, to second order in the perturbations. I know how to expand tensors that depend on the metric, but I don't ...
david's user avatar
  • 541
5 votes
1 answer
302 views

Why do we do partial and not covariant differentiation with $x^{\nu}$?

Why when taking the velocity vector we make $$u^{\nu}=\frac{d}{d\tau}x^{\nu}$$ and not $$u^{\nu}=\frac{\nabla}{d\tau}x^{\nu}$$ where in the last equation I meant the covariant derivative. Why?
Yossarian's user avatar
  • 6,137
1 vote
2 answers
3k views

Leibniz Rule for Covariant derivatives

I recently came across a video by prof Fredrick Schuller on general relativity where he defines the leibniz rule to be, $\nabla_X (T(\omega,Y))=\nabla_XT(\omega,Y)+T(\nabla_{X} \omega,Y)+T(\omega,\...
Jay's user avatar
  • 291
7 votes
2 answers
3k views

Covariant derivative of a covariant derivative

I'm trying to find the covariant derivative of a covariant derivative, i.e. $\nabla_a (\nabla_b V_c)$. This is something I've taken for granted a lot in calculations, namely I though that by the ...
Wooster's user avatar
  • 623
5 votes
2 answers
675 views

Is there a way to see that $ \nabla_\mu g_{\nu \rho} = 0 $ without explicit computation, where $\nabla_\mu$ refers to the covariant derivative?

In books, it is usually said that this is a consequence of the fact that parallel transport preserves dot product. How ?
Srivatsan Balakrishnan's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
2k views

Difference tensor between two connections

I am using these supergravity lecture notes by Gary W. Gibbons. On page 18, the author claims that geodesics and autoparallels coincide for a theory with totally antisymmetric torsion, and proves it ...
Academic Bot's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
593 views

Why aren't Christoffel symbols tensors? - asked from a fibre bundle perspective

I've been reading about connections on fibre bundles recently and it's made me think about the exact nature of the Christoffel symbols in GR. If we have a vector bundle $E$ over $M$ and put a ...
Sanjay Prabhakar's user avatar
3 votes
3 answers
2k views

What is the physical meaning of the Levi-Civita connection?

I'm taking a course in General Relativity and I have studied the fundamental theorem of Riemannian geometry: Let $M$ be a manifold with metric $g$. Then exists an unique torsion-free connection $\...
S -'s user avatar
  • 1,573
2 votes
1 answer
262 views

Exterior Derivative on Curved Manifold (SpaceTime)

Considering the 2-Form Gauge Potential $B_{\mu \nu}$, we can write $dB=H$. In a flat manifold we have that $H_{\mu \nu \rho}=\partial_{\mu}B_{\nu \rho}+\partial_{\rho}B_{\mu \nu}+\partial_{\nu}B_{\rho ...
Aleph12345's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
320 views

Is the contracted Christoffel symbol a tensor?

The coordinate transformation law (from coordinates x to coordinates y) for the Christoffel symbol is: $$\Gamma^i_{kl}(y)=\frac{\partial y^i}{\partial x^m} \frac{\partial x^n}{\partial y^k} \frac{\...
Tachyon's user avatar
  • 613
1 vote
1 answer
404 views

Difference between covariant derivatives in general relativity and electromagnetism

There are many similarities between the gauging of a $U(1)$ symmetry to obtain the physics of electromagnetism and the gauging of diffeomorphisms to obtain the physics of general relativity. In ...
AnotherShruggingPhysicist's user avatar
65 votes
4 answers
14k views

Lie derivative vs. covariant derivative in the context of Killing vectors

Let me start by saying that I understand the definitions of the Lie and covariant derivatives, and their fundamental differences (at least I think I do). However, when learning about Killing vectors I ...
Javier's user avatar
  • 28.6k
18 votes
1 answer
3k views

Is there a "covariant derivative" for conformal transformation?

A primary field is defined by its behavior under a conformal transformation $x\rightarrow x'(x)$: $$\phi(x)\rightarrow\phi'(x')=\left|\frac{\partial x'}{\partial x}\right|^{-h}\phi(x)$$ It's fairly ...
Learning is a mess's user avatar
16 votes
4 answers
6k views

Covariant derivative for spinor fields

scalars (spin-0) derivatives is expressed as: $$\nabla_{i} \phi = \frac{\partial \phi}{ \partial x_{i}}.$$ vector (spin-1) derivatives are expressed as: $$\nabla_{i} V^{k} = \frac{\partial V^{k}}{ \...
lurscher's user avatar
  • 14.8k
8 votes
3 answers
3k views

Are indices conventionally raised inside or outside of partial derivatives in general relativity?

If $A_\mu$ is a one-form, then is there a widely accepted convention among physicists about whether the notation $$\partial_\mu A^\mu \tag{1}$$ means "the partial-derivative four-divergence of the ...
tparker's user avatar
  • 49.4k
7 votes
5 answers
729 views

What does the metric condition $\nabla_\rho g_{\mu\nu}=0$ in General Relativity intuitively mean for an observer measuring distances?

In General Relativity, the following condition hold: $\nabla_\rho g_{\mu\nu}=0$, where $g_{\mu\nu}$ is the metric of spacetime which has to do with measuring distances and angles and $\nabla$ is the ...
TheQuantumMan's user avatar
7 votes
1 answer
3k views

Generalized divergence of tensor in GR

Although I've forgotten the proof (and cannot find it in, say, Carroll's book), the following formula holds for the covariant divergence in general relativity: $$\nabla_{\mu} A^{\mu} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{...
Dwagg's user avatar
  • 2,022
6 votes
4 answers
751 views

Do $\vec r$ and $d \vec r$ have the same direction?

One question is bugging me for a long time but I couldn't make out anything nor could my friends. Here it goes: We know, $\vec r$ is regarded as the position vector. So we can say, $$\vec r \cdot\vec ...
SchrodingersCat's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
4k views

Metric determinant and its partial and covariant derivative

question : $\nabla_a \nabla_b \sqrt{g} \phi =\partial_a \sqrt{g} \partial_b \phi$ is true? because $\nabla_a \sqrt{g}=0$ so we can write $\sqrt{g} \nabla_a \nabla_b \phi$ , but because the determinant ...
the_doors's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
4k views

How to calculate the covariant derivative $\nabla_{\bf e_\beta}{\bf e}_\alpha$ of a basis vector along another basis vector?

So in my relativity course, we recently learned about the covariant derivative. it is defined as: \begin{equation} \nabla_{\mu}V^{\nu} = \partial_{\mu}V^{\nu}+\Gamma^{\nu}_{\mu,\lambda}V^{\lambda} \...
user41178's user avatar
  • 1,001
6 votes
2 answers
2k views

Relationship between Connection and Material Derivative

Suppose $D\subset \Bbb R^3$ contains a fluid and that $f : D\times \mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}$ is a time dependent function defined on the fluid region. In that case, the material derivative is defined ...
Gold's user avatar
  • 37.4k
6 votes
5 answers
8k views

Covariant Derivative of Kronecker Delta

I am reading Carroll's book on GR right now, and I ran into a little trouble in his chapter 3 on curvature. He is establishing the properties of the covariant derivative, and claims that the fact that ...
nickodel's user avatar
  • 147
5 votes
2 answers
950 views

Gauge covariant derivative on form

Let $e$ be a one-form gauge field that belongs to the adjoint representation of the gauge group, that is SO(1,2). It is defined as \begin{equation} e = e_{\alpha}^{A}T_Adx^{\alpha}. \end{equation} ...
Ezareth's user avatar
  • 295
5 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is the inverse of the deformation gradient simply the deformation gradient of the inverse transformation?

If we have a continuum where the initial positions are denoted $X$ and the positions after some deformation are denoted $x$, the deformation gradient is defined: $$ F = \frac{\partial x}{\partial X} $...
nnn's user avatar
  • 103
4 votes
3 answers
1k views

Lie derivative of a vector along itself

The Lie derivative for a covariant and contravariant vector is: $$\mathcal{L}_U V^\mu=U^\nu\nabla_\nu V^\mu- V^\nu\nabla_\nu U^\mu$$ $$\mathcal{L}_U V_\mu=U^\nu\nabla_\nu V_\mu+ V_\nu\nabla_\mu U^\nu$$...
P. G. A.'s user avatar
  • 469
4 votes
0 answers
1k views

How is Infinitesimal coordinate transformation related to Lie derivatives?

I am reading the book "Gravitaion and Cosmology" by S. Weinberg. In section 10.9, while discussing Lie derivatives of tensors of different ranks, he makes a general comment: The effect of an ...
Sucheta's user avatar
  • 437
4 votes
1 answer
3k views

Differentiation of a vector with respect to a vector

Does differentiation of a vector with respect to a vector make any sense? Even if it makes sense, how does it make any physical meaning? I mean what is the physical interpretation?
SchrodingersCat's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
639 views

The strange character of operator $\nabla$

I was first introduced to the mathematical operation gradient, divergence and curl not in Mathematics but during my studies of Electromagnetism. As you all know learning Maths from a Physics teacher ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
340 views

Definition of exterior derivative

In Sean Carroll's GR book, pg 84, the exterior derivative $d$ is defined as $$(dA)_{\mu_1\mu_2...\mu_{p+1}} = (p+1) \partial_{[\mu_1}A_{\mu_2...\mu_{p+1}]}\tag{2.76}$$ where $A$ is a $p$-form and the ...
TaeNyFan's user avatar
  • 4,276
3 votes
2 answers
1k views

Why is 4-velocity not defined as the covariant derivative of position instead of the regular time derivative? [duplicate]

The geodesic equation is usually written as \begin{equation} D_\tau u^\mu = 0 \end{equation} where $D_\tau= u^\mu \nabla_\mu$ is the covariant proper time derivative and $u^\mu=\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau}$ ...
P. C. Spaniel's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can Yang-Mills field strength be defined as covariant derivative squared?

In Yang-Mills theory the field strength tensor $F_{\mu \nu}$ can be calculated as $$ \begin{equation} F_{\mu\nu} \equiv \frac{i}{g} [D_\mu,D_\nu] = \partial_\mu A_\nu - \partial_\nu A_\mu -ig[A_\mu,A_\...
MadMax's user avatar
  • 4,833
3 votes
1 answer
2k views

The role of the affine connection the geodesic equation

I apologise in advance that my knowledge of differential geometry and GR is very limited. In general relativity the equation of motion for a particle moving only under the influence of gravity is ...
rgvcorley's user avatar
  • 155
2 votes
2 answers
339 views

Different definitions of exterior derivative

In Sean Carroll's GR book, pg 84, the exterior derivative $d$ is defined as $$(dA)_{\mu_1\mu_2...\mu_{p+1}} = (p+1) \partial_{[\mu_1}A_{\mu_2...\mu_{p+1}]}\tag{2.76}$$ where $A$ is a $p$-form and the ...
TaeNyFan's user avatar
  • 4,276
2 votes
1 answer
346 views

Covariant derivative in field theory

I'm reading Physics from Symmetry by Jakob Schwichtenberg and in Chapter 7 equation 7.18 he introduces the covariant derivative when deriving the interaction Lagrangian density for the spin-$\frac{1}{...
Feng's user avatar
  • 432
2 votes
1 answer
261 views

Infinitesimal coordinate transformation and Lie derivative

I need to prove that under an infinitesimal coordinate transformation $x^{'\mu}=x^\mu-\xi^\mu(x)$, the variation of a vector $U^\mu(x)$ is $$\delta U^\mu(x)=U^{'\mu}(x)-U^\mu(x)=\mathcal{L}_\xi U^\mu$$...
vyali's user avatar
  • 372
2 votes
0 answers
86 views

Doubt on $SU(2)_{L} \times U(1)_{Y}$ covariant derivative and its action on a fermion

I) Introduction I.1) The mathematical structure is quite clear: given a spacetime $M$, and a Lie group $G$ (the gauge group), we can construct the Principal bundle $P^{G}_{M}$. The connection $1$-form ...
M.N.Raia's user avatar
  • 3,159
2 votes
2 answers
1k views

Action of Lie derivative on 1-forms

In Sean Carroll's spacetime and geometry appendix B he derives the action of the Lie derivative on 1-forms. He finds that $\mathcal{L}_X Y^\mu = [X, Y]^\mu$, which I believe is meant as $\mathcal{L}_X(...
Wihtedeka's user avatar
  • 2,068
1 vote
1 answer
98 views

Proving a Superfunction Identity

I am trying to figure out the proof of the identity given between equations (1.11.7) and (1.11.8) in ref. [1], i.e. \begin{align} \Phi'(e^{-K}\,z\,e^K)=e^{-K}\Phi'(z) \tag{1} \end{align} where $z=(...
Susan's user avatar
  • 49
1 vote
1 answer
270 views

Metric independent affine connections

Normally, the affine connections are objects that define parallel transport. In general Relativity they are the Christoffel symbols of the second kind. Consequently, they depend on the metric tensor. ...
Koustubh Kabe's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
197 views

What is the Lie derivative of the field describing the change of mass?

I'm trying to understand Ch. 3.2 of the paper On Bubble Rings and Ink Chandeliers by Padilla et al.. I'm trying to understand the derivation of equation (15). Right now I'm stuck at the point where ...
Joana Portmann's user avatar
1 vote
3 answers
437 views

Question about Wald's example of a "derivative operator"

I am trying to study Wald's book on General Relativity. I thought the first two chapters were ok, but I'm completely stuck in chapter 3, on page 32 where he gives an example of a "derivative ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
1 vote
1 answer
1k views

Covariant derivative ordering

I was working on a problem involving Bianchi identities, in a particular case I have to take the covariant derivative of the following, which indeed is the Ricci tensor in linearised limit $$r^{\mu}_{\...
Wiliam's user avatar
  • 278
0 votes
1 answer
385 views

Dirac's book *General Theory of Relativity*: Doesn't this show the partial derivative of the metric tensor is zero?

See the bold text for my question. This question regards Dirac's General Theory of Relativity page 13. In his demonstration that the length of a vector is unchanged by parallel displacement Dirac ...
Steven Thomas Hatton's user avatar