Questions tagged [group-theory]

Group theory is a branch of abstract algebra. A group is a set of objects, together with a binary operation, that satisfies four axioms. The set must be closed under the operation and contain an identity object. Every object in the set must have an inverse, and the operation must be associative. Groups are used in physics to describe symmetry operations of physical systems.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
13 views

Why are $E_{d(d)}$ representations labelled by integers?

Reducing 11d supergravity on a torus $T^d$ or, equivalently, IIB supergravity on $T^{d-1}$, one gets an exceptional $E_{d(d)}$ hidden symmetry, which is, in particular, the non-compact split real form ...
arow257's user avatar
  • 1,015
-4 votes
1 answer
56 views

Cannot understand this identity between kronecker and metric tensor [closed]

I'm working on Lorentz generators and I am really not able to understand this relation: $$\omega_{\rho \sigma} \eta^{\rho\mu} \delta^{\alpha}_{\nu} = \frac{1}{2}\omega_{\rho \sigma} \left(\eta^{\rho\...
Numb3rs's user avatar
  • 285
0 votes
0 answers
29 views

Unclear passage in Lorentz generators derivation

It's not clear to me a passage, in the extraction of the generators of Lorentz's group acting on the Minkowksi's space points: we have \begin{equation*} \begin{split} x^{' \alpha} & = \Lambda^{\...
Numb3rs's user avatar
  • 285
8 votes
4 answers
3k views

Understanding Wikipedia's definition of a spinor

I originally asked this question on math SE but I'm asking it again here due to the lack of responses. I should note that I come from a mathematical background and not a physics one so I am not ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 2,424
-1 votes
0 answers
20 views

Doubt about Killing vector and trasformation matrices [closed]

I'm studying the deSitter spacetime in two dimension, which has the following metric: $$ ds^2 = -dt^2 + \cosh(t)^2 d \phi^2 $$ with the Killing vectors $$ \xi_0 = \partial_\phi \\ \xi_1 = \cos(\phi) \...
michael pasqui's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
86 views

Quantization of charge from the path integral

Consider a complex scalar field, with the usual Lagrangian: $$ \mathcal{L} = | \partial_{\mu} \phi|^2 - V(|\phi|^2). $$ This theory has a $U(1)$ symmetry, $\phi \to e^{i \alpha} \phi$, and the ...
Zack's user avatar
  • 2,828
0 votes
0 answers
51 views

Georgi's "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" Theorem 1.2 proof

In Georgi's "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics", Theorem 1.2 reads Every representation of a finite group is completely reducible. The proof that follows contains the following lines If it ...
Steven Canning's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Character of group elements of the Lorentz group

I am looking for a reference for the character of the element of the Lorentz group. If the generator the Lorentz transformations is given by $$\Lambda = e^{i\alpha\cdot J-\beta\cdot K}$$, then I wish ...
Dr. user44690's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
62 views

(Anti-)Fundamental Representation of $SU(5)$ GUT

In many places, it has been mentioned that the sum of electrical charges of the particles present in $\overline{5}$ of $SU(5)$ is zero since the trace of $SU(5)$ generators is zero. I do not ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 85
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

Product of spherical tensors

Consider a spin $ j $ system. A spin $ j $ spherical tensor $ T^k_q(j) $ of rank $ k $ is a $ (2j+1) \times (2j+1) $ matrix. Given two spherical tensors of spin $ j $, say $ T^{k_1}_{q_1}(j) $ and $ T^...
Ian Gershon Teixeira's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
50 views

Why do we need to consider the full Poincare group to get unitary representations?

I am trying to study and understand QFT from the perspective of symmetries. I was referred to this super helpful answer by @ACuriousMind : https://physics.stackexchange.com/a/174908/50583. I still ...
qavidfostertollace's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
146 views

Some question about the irreducible representation of Poincare group

I am writing a note about the Poincare group and I am trying to explain that argument that one-particle state transforms under irreducible unitary representations of the Poincare group. However, there ...
David Shaw's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
149 views

Symmetry groups breaking for the lagrangian of two complex scalar fields

Suppose we have a generic non-interacting Lagrangian of two complex scalar fields, \begin{align} \mathcal{L} &= (\partial^\mu \Phi^\dagger)(\partial_\mu \Phi) - \Phi^\dagger\mathbb{M}^2\Phi \tag{1}...
IGY's user avatar
  • 1,621
1 vote
1 answer
39 views

How can a differential manifold also be a group? [closed]

I know that this is exactly what defines a Lie Group, but I don't understand the meaning of the proposition at all. I would really appreciate it if somebody could give me an intuitive explanation for ...
starseed_trooper's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
69 views

Decomposing direct product of spin-$s$ representation into direct sum

Direct product of spin-$s$ representations can be decomposed into direct sum of some other spin-s representation: $$ \{j\}\otimes\{s\}=\sum_{\oplus l=|j-s|}^{j+s}\{l\} $$ Howard Georgi gives a hint in ...
Photon's user avatar
  • 43
1 vote
0 answers
37 views

Domain walls in theories of axions

I'm stuck in figuring out why some theories of axions predict the existence of domain walls. Axions are NG bosons associated with the chiral $U(1)_{PQ}$ symmetry, which was spontaneously broken at ...
tak's user avatar
  • 107
1 vote
1 answer
41 views

How does 2 dimensional space transforms in 3-harmonic-oscillators problem?

I'm reading Lie Algebras in Particle Physics by Howard Georgi. When talking about an example of harmonic oscillator (on Page 27), it says "The 2 dimensional space transforms by the ...
Photon's user avatar
  • 43
1 vote
1 answer
86 views

Goldstone bosons and spontaneous symmetry breaking in the complex triplet model

In the Standard model electroweak theory, the Higgs field is a complex doublet field, which couples to the $SU(2)$ gauge field. Suppose we replace the complex doublet with a complex triplet $\Sigma$: $...
Daren's user avatar
  • 1,391
2 votes
0 answers
81 views

Are representations of (bosonic) Lie groups over Grassmann variables well understood?

When one studies representations of (bosonic) Lie groups in physics, whether dealing with spacetime symmetries or gauge symmetries, it is often left implicit whether the representations are over real ...
Craig's user avatar
  • 1,105
1 vote
1 answer
31 views

Why do we look for the representations of $\mathfrak{so}(1,3)$ when looking for projective representations of $SO^+(1,3)$?

In a relativistic quantum field theory, one classifies quantum fields by looking for finite dimensional projective representations of the restricted Lorentz group $SO^+(1,3)$ over the target space $V$ ...
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 1,932
0 votes
1 answer
45 views

Confusion on the helicity formalism

I'm studying group representation theory from a more mathematical point of view but I don't understand the link between helicity formalism and the "classical one". They should be both ...
michael pasqui's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Question about spinor inner products

Let a 2D spinor be given by $$\chi_2(p)=\pmatrix{\xi^1\\\xi^2}+i\pmatrix{\xi^3\\\xi^4}$$ with the $\xi^i$'s being real for $i=\{1,2,3,4\}$. Assume, now, that I want to represent this spinor by a real-...
schris38's user avatar
  • 3,799
4 votes
1 answer
88 views

Dimension of singlet subspace of $2N$ identical spin-1/2 particles

Consider a quantum system of $2N$ identical spin 1/2 particles, each having a 2D Hilbert space $V$. The total Hilbert space is the tensor product $V^{\otimes 2N} \equiv V \otimes \cdots \otimes V$. ...
Zhengyuan Yue's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
95 views

Question regarding one-particle states being irreducible representations of the Poincare group

I am a bit confused with the way Physics textbooks use the word 'representation'. I was reading Weinberg's QFT and in section (2.5) titled One-Particle states, he shows that (eq. 2.5.3) \begin{...
QFTheorist's user avatar
3 votes
4 answers
304 views

Generators of ${\rm SU}(n)$ are traceless. Why?

A general element of the Lie group ${\rm SU}(n)$ is written as $$ g({\vec{\theta}})=e^{-i\sum_a\theta_a T_a} $$ where $\theta_a$ for $(a=1,2,\ldots,n^2-1)$ denotes $n^2-1$ real parameters. The ...
Solidification's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
39 views

What is meant by dimension of the defining representation (and adjoint representation)?

A linear representation of a classical Lie group $G$ is defined by $\rho:g \to GL(V)$ where $g \in G$ is a group element and $V$ is the representation space. The dimension of the representation space(...
Sanjana's user avatar
  • 91
3 votes
1 answer
260 views

About the notation of Lie algebra, upstairs and downstairs indices

In some textbooks, Lie algebra is written as $$[X_a, X_b]=if_{abc}X_c$$ where $X_a$'s are the generators of the Lie group. But sometimes, the Lie algebra is written as $$[X_a,X_b]=if_{ab}^{~~~ c}X_c$$ ...
Solidification's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Resources on representations theory and harmonic analysis

I'm studing the representation theory of the group $SL(2,R)$ from the book "Lorentz group and harmonic analysis" of Ruhl, in particular I'm interest in chapter 5 and 6. I'm a master students ...
0 votes
1 answer
55 views

The relation between spin and momentum in particle state

In quantum field theory, it seems that when we consider a massive particle's spin degree of freedom, we usually do in the particle's rest frame. And I know the little group will only change spin DOF ...
Haiqin Tang's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
43 views

Why are the weight vectors corresponding to the raising and lowering operators given by the formula $\bar{t_{1}}- \bar{t_{2}}$?

I am reading Robinson's particle physics paper part-I which is available in the public domain here, particularly the theory of SU(3) Lie Groups. Page 63 of the text states that, Now, repeating ...
Omega Ds's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
20 views

Are there any indications that the hat polykite or spectre appear as aperiodic structures in materials?

It is known that certain aperiodic structures appear in quasichrystals. For instance, Daniel Schechtman and Ilan Blech discovered that the aluminium-manganese alloy Al$_{6}$Mn has no translational ...
Max Muller's user avatar
  • 1,053
2 votes
2 answers
90 views

Is the $(\frac{1}{2},\frac{1}{2})$ representation of $SO(3,1)$ reducible or not?

From wikipedia and some other sources, I've read that if $G_1$ and $G_2$ are two irreps of some group, then $G_1\otimes G_2$ can be a representation of both the group $G$ and the new group $G \times G$...
Nakshatra Gangopadhay's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
92 views

Is it possible for a Lorentz scalar to NOT be invariant under another linear transformation?

Lorentz scalars are invariant under Lorentz transformations, which are a subset of linear transformations. I wanted to know if it is possible, for a Lorentz scalar, to NOT be invariant with respect to ...
TrentKent6's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
443 views

Is the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition of Lie algebra or Lie group representations?

In my lectures on groups and representations, we write the Clebsch-Gordan decomposition for addition of angular momenta $$r_{j_1}\otimes r_{j_2}=\bigoplus_{j=|j_1-j_2|}^{j_1+j_2}r_j\tag{1}$$ where $...
Ghorbalchov's user avatar
  • 2,012
0 votes
1 answer
93 views

Irreps of $SU(2)$ versus the irreps of $SU(3)$

For the group $SU(2)$, the fundamental representation corresponds to $j=1/2$, for which the highest (eigen)value of $J_3$ is $+1/2$ and the lowest (eigen)value is $-1/2$. For $j=1$ representation, the ...
Solidification's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

Seeking Spinor Operation Analogous to $M^T \eta M = g$ for GL$^+(4,\mathbb{R})$/Spin$^c$(3,1)

I'm exploring the spinorial representation of the Spin$^c$(3,1) group, especially in the context of metric preservation in general relativity and quantum field theory. For the group GL$^+(4,\mathbb{R}$...
Anon21's user avatar
  • 1,536
1 vote
1 answer
96 views

Confused about two different definitions for the same object $\psi_i$ in the representation theory of $\mathrm{SU}(n)$

Let the entities $\psi^i$ transform as the fundamental representation of $\mathrm{SU}(n)$, denoted by ${\bf n}$: $$ \psi^{\prime i}=U^{i}_{~j}\psi^j, $$ where, of course, $U$ represents $n\times n$ ...
Solidification's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
45 views

How to derive the Lorentz Invariant bilinear form in the $(1/2, 1/2)$ representation?

We can represent the complexified proper Lorentz group Lie algebra as the direct sum $\mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C}) \oplus \mathfrak{sl}(2, \mathbb{C})$. The representation nomenclature is $(n,m)$, two ...
Samael's user avatar
  • 41
3 votes
2 answers
121 views

Why is the Lorentz transformation of fields linear?

I know that the coordinate, $x^\mu = (t,\vec x)$ is a 4-vector and it transforms as $$x'^\mu={\Lambda^\mu}_\nu x^\nu.$$ The related (classical or quantized) field, $\phi_a(x)$, can be classified into ...
Luessiaw's user avatar
  • 558
1 vote
1 answer
75 views

Lorentz invariant tensors of odd rank

How to prove that Lorentz invariant tensors of odd rank are all zero? I somehow think that determinant or generator of the Lorentz group should be used.
hi13's user avatar
  • 13
1 vote
1 answer
84 views

Why the Double Covering?

It is known mathematically that given a bilinear form $Q$ with signature $(p,q)$ then the group $Spin(p,q)$ is the double cover of the group $SO(p,q)$ associated to $Q$, and that $Pin(p,q)$ is the ...
LolloBoldo's user avatar
  • 1,206
0 votes
2 answers
92 views

Topological proof of spin-statistics theorem confusion

I am currently studying the spin-statistics theorem. I have found a section on John Baez's website which presents a "proof" of the spin-statistics theorem. He states the theorem as: This is ...
Relativisticcucumber's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
53 views

Algebra equation for rank-3 tensor

Suppose I work in $4$ dimensions. I have an algebraic equation in the following form, which contains a rank-3 tensor $X ^{\alpha \lambda \mu }$ \begin{equation} X ^{\alpha \lambda \mu }\eta ^{\beta \...
A.D's user avatar
  • 1
0 votes
0 answers
61 views

Why is it not Pin(1,3) or Pin(3,1) in condensed matter physics?

In electron systems (or condensed matter physics), it is well known that $T^2=-1$ and $M^2=-1$, where $T$ and $M$ are time reversal and reflection along some axis. But in general, the symmetry of ...
edittide's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Why 3 mmm and 4mmmm point group symmetry elements do not exist?

Why 3 mmm and 4mmmm point group symmetry elements do not exist? How we can say 3 mmm and 4mmmm are rather equivalent to 3m and 4mm respectively?
Joy's user avatar
  • 1
0 votes
1 answer
59 views

Why must Hamiltonian of a system be invariant under every operation of the relevant point group?

It is always claimed in any group theory books: "Hamiltonian of a system must be invariant under every operation of the relevant point group" or $RHR^{-1}=H$. Suppose I have a Hamiltonian of ...
Zharip's user avatar
  • 81
1 vote
1 answer
98 views

How is the Wigner little group representation of Poincaré group Unitary?

From Weinberg's QFT Vol.1, eq(2.5.11): $$U(\Lambda)\Psi_{p,\sigma}=({N(p)\over N(\Lambda p)})\sum_{\sigma'}D_{\sigma'\sigma}(W(\Lambda,p))\Psi_{\Lambda p ,\sigma '}.\tag{2.5.11}$$ However, this is not ...
Bababeluma's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
70 views

How many degrees of freedom does a photon have in 2+1D?

Wigner's classification of particles implies that the internal degrees of freedom of a particle transform under unitary representations of the subgroup of the Lorentz group that leaves its momentum ...
Panopticon's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
74 views

What kind of a space is $\mathbb{C}_{-1}$?

In the first paragraph on page 24 of this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/0904.1556, it's written the left-handed leptons $\nu_L$ and $e^−_L$ both have hypercharge $Y=−1$, so each one spans a copy of $\...
vyali's user avatar
  • 328
0 votes
0 answers
18 views

Time reversal of Bloch waves in photonic crystals

In solid-state physics, I understand that in the case of no spin, the time reversal operator $\hat{T}$ is equal to the complex conjugation operator $\hat{K}$ and in the case with spin, $\hat{T} = \hat{...
photonica's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
44