Skip to main content
Search type Search syntax
Tags [tag]
Exact "words here"
Author user:1234
user:me (yours)
Score score:3 (3+)
score:0 (none)
Answers answers:3 (3+)
answers:0 (none)
isaccepted:yes
hasaccepted:no
inquestion:1234
Views views:250
Code code:"if (foo != bar)"
Sections title:apples
body:"apples oranges"
URL url:"*.example.com"
Saves in:saves
Status closed:yes
duplicate:no
migrated:no
wiki:no
Types is:question
is:answer
Exclude -[tag]
-apples
For more details on advanced search visit our help page
Results tagged with
Search options not deleted user 136463

Quantum Field Theory (QFT) is the theoretical framework describing the quantisation of classical fields which allows a Lorentz-invariant formulation of quantum mechanics. QFT is used both in high energy physics as well as condensed matter physics and closely related to statistical field theory. Use this tag for many-body quantum-mechanical problems and the theory of particle physics. Don’t combine with the [quantum-mechanics] tag.

4 votes
Accepted

Off-shell QFT from on-shell amplitudes

Maybe a non-rigorous answer formulated in the language of perturbative QFT helps. Examples can be produced in this context by performing non-trivial redefinitions of the fields. The off-shell Green f …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
7 votes

How many quantum fields are there?

The Standard Model of particle physics is the current well stablished theory for elementary particles. In it, fields are grouped together using symmetries (Lorentz and gauge) in what are called multip …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
3 votes

Can charged scalar have non-zero vev?

Charged scalars can't have a non-zero vev, because after spontaneous symmetry breaking the $U(1)_{em}$ subgroup of $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ survives, which means that the vacuum is invariant under it. …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
5 votes
1 answer
741 views

Classical version of tree-level QFT correlation functions

Having read this previous question (and its answers) about the relation between tree-level quantum field theory and classical field theory I can see two facts that support the (perhaps too vague) stat …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
2 votes
Accepted

Uncertainty principle and measurement of the mass of Virtual particles

There are both virtual and real $W^{\pm}$, $Z$ bosons. Just as with photons (and for any other case), virtual $W^\pm$ and $Z$ bosons are some internal lines on Feynman diagrams and real $W^\pm$ and $ …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
0 votes
Accepted

Fermion anti-commutation relations

As you correctly state: \begin{align} \{\psi_{\alpha}({\bf x},t),{\bar \psi}_{\beta} ({\bf x'},t)\} &= \{\psi_{\alpha}({\bf x},t),(\psi^{\dagger}({\bf x'},t) \, \gamma^0)_{\beta}\} = \{\psi_{\ …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
2 votes

How does Euclidean Quantum Field Theory describe tunneling?

The relation between tunneling and classical paths in imaginary time can already be seen in single particle quantum mechanics. In the path integral formulation, each path $x(t)$ contributes with ampl …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
1 vote

Fock Space, Propagator

It is unclear what is meant by "classical time-varying wave function". For example: The quantum state of a particle without spin in three dimensions is a function $\mathbb{R}^3\to \mathbb{C}$. Its …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
3 votes

Can the Lagrangian of an effective field theory have higher derivative terms?

Yes, it can. In principle there isn't a reason not to include them. Of course, once we add them the theory will be different, just as it happens when you add any other type of higher dimensional opera …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
2 votes

Are non-renormalizable theories less predictive than renormalizable theories?

The effective lagrangian is usually written as an expansion in inverse powers of the energy cut-off $\Lambda$. That means that observables at some energy $E$ will be computed as the first terms of an …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
0 votes
Accepted

Proof of quantum correlation functions

First question Using that $S=U_I(+\infty,-\infty)=U_I(+\infty, t_1)U_I(t_1,t_2)\cdots U_I(t_n,-\infty)$, as you state, you have that \begin{align} T\phi_{1I}\phi_{2I}\cdots\phi_{nI}S &= T\phi_{1I}\p …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
5 votes

Why are derivatives in interaction terms treated differently from derivatives in the kinetic...

Informally speaking (I don't know if this can be stated more rigorously) we can treat the kinetic terms as having Feynman rule $\sim p^2$, in some sense. Consider the massive case: $\mathcal{L}=|\par …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
14 votes
Accepted

What is wrong with a nonrenormalizable theory?

In the modern effective field theory point of view, there's nothing wrong with non-renormalizable theories. In fact, one may prefer a non-renormalizable theory inasmuch they tell you the point at whi …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733
2 votes
Accepted

Why and how does the soft breaking of symmetry protect the mass of pseudo Nambu-Goldstone bo...

When the symmetry is broken explicitly by a relevant operator, its contribution is negligible at high energies. Thus, if $f$ is the scale of the breaking operator, at energies $\Lambda\gg f$ the symme …
coconut's user avatar
  • 4,733