Skip to main content

Questions tagged [lagrangian-formalism]

For questions involving the Lagrangian formulation of a dynamical system. Namely, the application of an action principle to a suitably chosen Lagrangian or Lagrangian Density in order to obtain the equations of motion of the system.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
27 views

Schwinger approach using the heat kernel [closed]

I am having trouble calculating the effective action for a constant magnetic background. The calculations I am trying to replicate are from this paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9807031 . The ...
Matthijs's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
40 views

Equation of motion for $X^{\mu}$ (geodesic equation)

The action for a relativistic particle of mass $m$ in a curved $D$-dimensional is $$\tilde{S}_0=\frac{1}{2}\int d\tau (\dot{X}^2-m^2)$$ for particular gauge and $\dot{X}^2=g_{\mu\nu}(X)\dot{X}^{\mu}\...
Mahtab's user avatar
  • 410
2 votes
1 answer
139 views

Proving that the Lagrangian of a free particle depends only on $|\boldsymbol{v}|^2$

The question is NOT answered by Deriving the Lagrangian for a free particle, as the answers therein assume the quadratic dependence, which is what I am trying to prove. Additionally, while one of the ...
Mark199612's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
18 views

Partial differentiation assumption in development of equation of motion for Lagrangian [duplicate]

In the book "Quantum Field Theory Demystified", David McMahon derives the equation of motion for the Lagrangian: $$ L=\frac{1}{2}(\{\partial{_u\phi})^2-m^2\phi^2\} $$ where $ \phi $ is the ...
stowyn's user avatar
  • 1
1 vote
1 answer
50 views

Lagrangian Formulation in Non-Conservative Systems

I am working in a non-conservative system. Would it make a difference if I Formulate the Lagrange Equation with an additional term on the right hand side of the equation to account for the Rayleigh ...
Ee Kin Chan's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
44 views

Minimizing the action - particle in a potential well

Consider a particle starting at rest in a potential well, the problem is restricted to one dimension. The lagrangian is $L=T-V$, set $V$ to 0 in the starting location, we get $L(t=0)=0$. If the ...
The Catalyst's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
24 views

Derivative returning zero in dynamic model (SymPy) [closed]

I'm modeling the dynamics of a beam coupled with an oscillator excited by an external force, but when I try to formulate the Euler-Lagrange equation for the beam, the code returns zero for the ...
Josué Lima's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
50 views

Invariance of the action under a symmetry of 2D isotropic harmonic oscillator

I have a question on the invariance of the action under symmetry transformation. As the simplest example, here I consider two dimensional Harmonic oscillator. After some rescaling, the Hamiltonian can ...
watahoo's user avatar
  • 155
2 votes
0 answers
45 views

Propagator for Schwarzian action perturbation

I am reading a paper arxiv:1606.01857. This paper expand the Schwarzian action in equation (4.26) $$ \tau=u+\epsilon(u).\tag{4.26} $$ Then the action becomes equation (4.27) $$ I=\frac{C}{2}\int du[\...
likai's user avatar
  • 71
3 votes
1 answer
86 views

Where this definition $T_{\alpha\beta}=-\frac{2}{T}\frac{1}{\sqrt{-h}}\frac{\delta S}{\delta h^{\alpha \beta}}$ come from?

In the book "String theory and M-theory" by Becker, Becker and Schwarz, the author says that the Nambu-Goto action $$S_{NG}=-T\int d\sigma\, \tau \sqrt{(\dot{X}\cdot X')^2 -\dot{X}^2X'^2}$$ ...
Mahtab's user avatar
  • 410
1 vote
1 answer
72 views

Why $SU(N)$ and not $U(N)$?

I am going through one example where they introduce the lagrangian density \begin{equation} L(x) = \sum_{i = 1}^N \partial^\mu \phi_i^* \partial_\mu \phi_i - m^2 \phi_i^* \phi_i = \partial^\mu \Phi^\...
Sharpie's user avatar
  • 21
2 votes
1 answer
61 views

Diagrammatic computations in the theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking

I am looking for an reasonably detailed and instructive exposition of some computations with Feynman diagrams of a theory with spontaneous symmetry breaking (but with no Higgs mechanism). I wonder how ...
MKO's user avatar
  • 2,271
2 votes
1 answer
81 views

Rewriting the Euclidean on-shell action of Schwarzschild-AdS

The Schwarzschild-AdS solution is given by \begin{align} \label{eq: Schwarzschild-AdS metric} ds^2=-f(r)dt^2+\frac{dr^2}{f(r)}+r^2d\Omega^2\,, \end{align} where \begin{align} f(r)=1-\frac{2MG}{r}-\...
hyriusen's user avatar
  • 329
1 vote
0 answers
36 views

Renormalization on External Field in Effective Potential Formalism

Effective potential formalism provides an intuitive definition of stabe states in quantum field theory, see chapter 11 in Peskin and Schroeder, that is defined at the minimum of effective potential. ...
Ting-Kai Hsu's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Calculations Regarding Neutrino Self-Interaction

I have recently been looking at papers talking about neutrino self-interactions and have seen quite different results among papers. One considers the addition of ${\mathcal{L}} \supset \frac{\lambda_{\...
user62783's user avatar
  • 181
0 votes
0 answers
45 views

Inverse propagator matrix from Lagrangian

Given a Lagrangian, how do I find the inverse propagator matrix? For example, $$ \begin{aligned} &\mathscr{L}_\pi=\mathrm{D}_0 \pi^* \mathrm{D}_0 \pi-\nabla \pi \nabla \pi^*-\mathrm{b}^2 \mu^2 \pi^...
Display name's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
48 views

1PI quantum effective action for free scalar theory [duplicate]

I have a very basic question on quantum effective action. Consider the free scalar field with the action $$I[\phi]=\int d^4x \frac{1}{2}((\partial\phi)^2-m^2\phi^2).$$ How to compute explicitly the ...
MKO's user avatar
  • 2,271
-3 votes
1 answer
71 views

Deriving Euler-Lagrange Equation [closed]

The author is demonstrating how you might derive the Euler-Lagrange equation by minimising the action at a certain point. He substitutes a point $x_8$ into the lagrangian and then differentiates the ...
Jac Simone's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
50 views

Ambiguity for boundary conditions after conformal transformation

Abbreviations EOM = Equations of motion BCs = Boundary conditions CT = conformal transformation Intro I was playing around a bit with EOMs, action principle, CTs and BCs. There, I met a problem. ...
Octavius's user avatar
  • 877
1 vote
1 answer
50 views

How to calculate the functional derivative of a product?

Let $\omega_{J}^{I}=\omega^{I}_{\nu~J}dx^{\nu}$ be a one-form connection with values in the Lorentz group $SO(3,1)$ and $$B_{J}^{I}=B^{I}_{\mu\nu~J}dx^{\mu}\wedge dx^{\nu}$$ a two-form with values in ...
Thomas Belichick's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
77 views

Identifying Lagrangian as the solution to the variational problem from the Hamilton's principle

We understand that we derive Lagrange equations, $$\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_j}\right)-\frac{\partial L}{\partial q_j}=0, \tag{1}$$ starting from d'Alembert's principle of ...
user31694's user avatar
  • 341
2 votes
0 answers
83 views

1-loop renormalization for interacting scalar theory - choice of the subtraction point

I would like to clarify some things about interacting scalar fields. In particlar I am having trouble with subtraction points in 1 loop renormalization of the theory. The lagrangian for 2 interacting ...
Federico De Matteis's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
264 views

Why half in Lagrangian density of Klein-Gordon field? [duplicate]

The Lagrangian density for the real Klein-Gordon field, which describes a real scalar field $\phi$ with mass $m$ is given by \begin{equation} \mathcal{L} = \frac{1}{2} \partial^\mu \phi \, \partial_\...
AVOY JANA's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
259 views

Does nature maximize or minimize spacetime curvature?

This question is based on the Einstein-Hilbert action, which states $S=\frac{1}{2\kappa}\int_{ }^{ }R\sqrt{-g}d^{4}x$, where $R$, the Ricci Scalar, is some measure of the spacetime curvature. The ...
Shacks's user avatar
  • 396
0 votes
0 answers
40 views

Question about the action function of the electromagnetic field (Landau & Lifshitz)

In Landau's Classical Field Theory, the action function of the electromagnetic field is constructed based on the following facts (Chapter 4,$\S 27$): $S_f$ is the integration of sum scalar function ...
Jason Chen's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
63 views

Does anyone know if a lagrangian term of the form $\mathcal{L}=\frac{g}{4}\bar{\psi}\sigma^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu \nu}\psi$ has a name?

I am currently working in a problem that involes an interaction lagrangian of the form $\mathcal{L}=\frac{g}{4}\bar{\psi}\sigma^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu \nu}\psi$ and i would like to know if it has a name so ...
Tori's user avatar
  • 3
0 votes
0 answers
61 views

Why is the gauge field $A_\mu$ real for $\mathrm{U}(N)$ symmetry? [duplicate]

This question is a duplicate of this question asked on Maths S-E From my notes I have that The transformation law, $$A_\mu\to MA_\mu M+\frac{i}{g}\left(\partial_\mu M\right)M^\dagger\tag{1}$$ can be ...
Sirius Black's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
128 views

In which dimensions is it possible to define supersymmetric actions?

Susy gauge theories only exist in dimensions 3,4,6,10. This is stated by Baez and Huerta as: Nonabelian Yang-Mills fields minimally coupled to massless spinors are supersymmetric if and only if the ...
arivero's user avatar
  • 1,861
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

Renormalization verse dimensional regularization [duplicate]

I am trying to learn QFT for fun, well past college age and have never sat in a college classroom. I understand counter terms, and how they re-normalize the Lagrangian fairly well. I understand a ...
Joe Hynes's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
34 views

How to compute the derivative of action with respect to magnetic field?

In Magnetohydrodynamics, the Lagrangian density can be written as [1]: $$\mathcal{L}=\mathcal{L}_0-\frac{|\mathbf{B}|^2}{2\mu_0}+\boldsymbol\Gamma\cdot\left( \frac{\partial\mathbf{B}}{\partial ...
106207436's user avatar
4 votes
0 answers
66 views

Why do we treat quadratic counterterms as interactions rather than free terms? [duplicate]

For example, in QED (or any other theory containing particles with spin 1/2) the renormalized countains $$ \mathcal{L} \subset \bar{\psi} (i \displaystyle{\not}\partial -m)\psi + \bar{\psi} (\delta_2 ...
Gabriel Ybarra Marcaida's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
86 views

Definition of global supersymmetry on curved spacetimes and use of constant spinor fields

According to "Quantum Fields and Strings: A Course for Mathematicians" (Deligne et al.), we call theories supersymmetric if their action functional is invariant under the action of a super ...
anonymous250's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
33 views

Problem with Dirac-Bergmann algorithm [closed]

This is from Lemos, Analytical Mechanics, Problem 8.24. Consider the Lagrangian $$L = (\dot{y}- z)(\dot{x} - y).$$ I found the Lagrangian equations of motion to be $$\ddot{y} = \dot{z},$$ $$\ddot{x} = ...
Stomp Stomp school's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
116 views

Boundary conditions on Schwarzschild event horizon

Consider the variational problem for a scalar field in Schwarzschild spacetime $M$ with respect to Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates $(v,r, \theta, \varphi)$, i.e. $$\delta I(\phi) = \int_M dV \ \Big(...
Octavius's user avatar
  • 877
1 vote
0 answers
42 views

About Yo-yo motion and forces constraint

The purpose of the Euler-Lagrange equation, is supposed to enable us to describe a system with the fewest possible coordinates, using generalized coordinates instead of traditional ones. However, in ...
Abdelhakim Benkrane's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
136 views

On the Background Independence condition

In General Relativity, one has that the equations of motion for any matter distribution are given by extremizing the following action: \begin{equation} S[g] = \int\left[\frac{1}{8\pi}(R - 2\Lambda) + ...
Davyz2's user avatar
  • 477
1 vote
0 answers
35 views

How to derive D brane effective action? The result is super Yang-Mills action

It is said that the effective action on $N$ coincident D branes is $U(N)$ super Yang-Mills (SYM) action with 16 super charges. On D3 branes it is $4d,\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM $$ L = -\int d^4x. Tr[ \frac{1}{...
zixuan feng's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
84 views

Relativistic Lagrangian for a System of Massive Particles

The standard Lagrangian $L$ written in local coordinates for a free, relativistic particle of mass $m > 0$ is given by $$L(q, \dot{q}) = -m \sqrt{-g_{\mu\nu}(q) \dot{q}^\mu \dot{q}^\nu}\tag{1}$$ ...
J_Psi's user avatar
  • 348
0 votes
0 answers
32 views

Proca lagrangian equations of motion [duplicate]

In his book Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Matthew D. Schwartz postulates the Lagrangian for a massive spin 1 field (eq. 8.23): \begin{equation} \mathcal L=\frac{a}{2}A_\nu \partial_\mu\...
Sidd's user avatar
  • 1,268
2 votes
1 answer
60 views

Deriving an explicit form of the boundary term in the symmetry variation of action

In many treatments of Noether theorem [e.g. Srednicki's book eq. (22.27), Banados' review eq. (2.65), David Tong's notes on QFT eq. (1.38), Peskin & Schroeder eq. (2.12), etc.] an almost explicit ...
Nairit Sahoo's user avatar
6 votes
3 answers
914 views

Conservation of energy in a mechanical system with a discontinuous potential function

I've started reading Landau-Lifshitz Mechanics, and I'm having trouble with the problem at the end of section 7. A particle of mass $m$ moving with velocity $\mathbf{v}_1$ leaves a half-space in ...
Fiona's user avatar
  • 63
1 vote
1 answer
69 views

Building fields from the Kallen-Lehmann representation formula

The standard QFT textbook presentation is usually such that the Lagrangian/theory is given first and then things like the 2-point function, propagator, and Kallen-Lehmann representation are derived as ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,542
0 votes
2 answers
53 views

Doubt when considering the signs for the Lagrangian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field

This is a trivial question probably, i have a doubt when considering the signs for the Lagrangian for a charged particle in an electromagnetic field. Considering that the Lagrangian for a charged ...
Phpp's user avatar
  • 1
2 votes
1 answer
70 views

Deriving Beltrami identity when there are multiple dependent functions

I'm trying to understand this solution to the brachistochrone problem inside a uniform sphere. Going from equation (19) to (20) and (21), the integrand of the functional we're trying to minimize is of ...
hjk's user avatar
  • 23
-2 votes
3 answers
121 views

When computing the Euler–Lagrange equations, why do we assume the coordinates do not depend on time?

I've just started to learn lagrangians through this video and I'm a bit confused. The setup has that $L = T-V$. With $T=\tfrac{1}{2}mv^2$ and $V=mgx$. So, $L= \tfrac{1}{2}m(dx/dt)^2-mgx$. This is all ...
zzz's user avatar
  • 123
4 votes
1 answer
117 views

Commutation of the functional derivative for the 1PI effective action and off-diagonal propagators in field space

Given a scalar real Yukawa theory, \begin{equation} L = \varphi_1G_0^{-1}\varphi_1 + \varphi_2 G_0^{-1} \varphi_2 - \frac{\lambda}{2}\varphi_1 \varphi_2^2\tag{1} \end{equation} of the two fields $\...
Rooky's user avatar
  • 113
3 votes
4 answers
678 views

The proof of conservation of momentum in Mechanics by Landau and Lifshitz

In reading the first chapter of Mechanics by Landau and Lifshitz, there is one point on which I consistently get stuck. This regards the proof in $\S 7$ that space homogeneity implies conservation ...
jnhnum1's user avatar
  • 33
4 votes
1 answer
59 views

Need help understanding lagrangian applied to mass on spring problem [closed]

I am interested in learning physics, and I was trying to learn about the Lagrangian method for classical mechanics through https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/david-morin/files/cmchap6.pdf, but I ...
Confused_boy's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
79 views

How can you have a potential in a theory without any forces?

Consider the typical Lagrangian: $$L=\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\mu\phi)(\partial^\mu\phi) - V(\phi).$$ I interpret the above (please correct me) as a theory consisting of a field which can move through ...
Peter Petrov's user avatar
-2 votes
1 answer
88 views

Deriving Feynman rules for QED using the path integral

The Lagrangian for QED is $$\mathcal{L} = \bar{\psi}(i\displaystyle{\not}\partial -m)\psi - \frac14(F_{\mu\nu})^2 - e\bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi A_\mu = \mathcal{L}_0 - e\bar{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi A_\mu.$$ ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 3,542

1
2 3 4 5
109