Questions tagged [time-evolution]

The quantum mechanical time evolution operator governs how observables and/or states evolve during finite time steps, and is always unitary. Use this tag for questions about the time evolution operator, or the different equations of motion in the Schrödinger/Heisenberg/Dirac pictures. For time-independent Hamiltonians, the time evolution operator is simply exp(-iHt).

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
3 answers
119 views

Evolution of volumes in Phase-Space

Liouville's theorem states that the volume occupied by an ensemble does not change as the ensemble evolves. My question regards the volume of the smallest sphere that contains the ensemble. Is there a ...
Antonio Bernardo's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
123 views

Time Evolution for Interacting Particles [closed]

Let us consider a Hamiltonian consisting of some quantity times the tensor product of two Pauli Spin matrices. How does one deal with the time evolution operator in this context? We usually do the ...
user378599's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
32 views

Solving time-dependent two-levels hamiltonian [closed]

I would like to solve the time-dependent Schrodinger equation for a two-levels system with a time-dependent Hamiltonian ($ \hbar = 1 $) $$ H(t) = \frac{\Omega_R}{2} i (\sigma_+ e^{i t \Delta}-\sigma_- ...
XxscheggiaxX's user avatar
-2 votes
0 answers
57 views

Why Magnetic Field doesn't annihilate itself?

Reasked, edited Note: I don't get why it is not a good question according to some people, but as far as I can say it is well posed. If usefulness is of matter, the question is about why zero energy ...
Mahammad Yusifov's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
26 views

Exact solution of the evolution operator generated by a linearly driven quantum harmonic oscillator

Consider a linearly driven quantum harmonic oscillator with the time-dependent Hamiltonian $H(t) = \hbar \omega a^{\dagger} a + i \hbar \left[ \varepsilon(t) a^{\dagger} - \varepsilon^*(t) a \right]$, ...
Conn-CaoYK's user avatar
-1 votes
2 answers
66 views

Cohen Quantum Mechanics Derivation? [closed]

I dont understand the argument on page 38 eq. (C-6) of Cohen's quantum mechanics. Could someone break down for me what is $g(k)$? Is it the initial condition?
Lyu's user avatar
  • 109
15 votes
2 answers
1k views

What physical processes other than scattering are accounted for by QFT? How do they fit into the general formalism?

For background, I'm primarily a mathematics student, studying geometric Langlands and related areas. I've recently been trying to catch up on the vast amount of physics knowledge I'm lacking, but I've ...
NewToPhysics's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
140 views

Why is this Heisenberg EOM true even for time-dependent magnetic fields (spin dynamics)?

In what follows, I will use primes to denote Heisenberg picture operators (non-primed operators will be Schrödinger picture). In his Chapter 12.1 on spin dynamics, Ballentine has us first consider a ...
EE18's user avatar
  • 1,135
0 votes
2 answers
93 views

Time-evolution of momentum eigenstate under harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian

I'm wanting to understand the dynamics of a momentum eigenstate $| p \rangle$ governed by a harmonic oscillator Hamiltonian. Consider $\hat{H} = \hat{p}^2 + \hat{q}^2$. Then inserting a completeness ...
j.foobles's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
98 views

Eigenvalues of an time-ordered exponential operator

Let's consider a simple 1-qubit time-dependent Hamiltonian: $$H(t) = \delta(t) \sigma_x + \sigma_z \ ,$$ where $\delta(t)$ is some time-continuous (real-valued) function. Evolving $H(t)$ continuously ...
Mohan's user avatar
  • 63
1 vote
3 answers
151 views

Is there a physical reason why the time evolution in quantum mechanics is given by $e^{-itH}$? [duplicate]

Let $H$ be the Hamiltonian operator. Since $H$ is self-adjoint, by Stone's theorem there is a strongly continuous one-parameter unitary group $U(t)$ such that $U(t) = e^{-itH}$. Mathematically this ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 2,182
4 votes
1 answer
253 views

Causal expansion of EM fields

When an electron and positron are created at the same time and location, is it correct to say that the electromagnetic field due to the two particles is zero when $r>ct$?
Denn's user avatar
  • 157
2 votes
0 answers
46 views

Understanding adiabatic elimination in three-level system coupled to EM field

I am having some difficulties understanding the "adiabatic elimination" in the context of atomic physics. In particular, consider a three-level system with states labeled by $|g_1\rangle$, $|...
Matteo's user avatar
  • 2,586
0 votes
1 answer
25 views

Factorization of density matrices

I'm currently reading through the following document about quantum noise and open quantum systems: https://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse599d/06wi/lecturenotes13.pdf. On page 6 of the document, ...
slithy_tove's user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
902 views

Is unitary time evolution the same as obeying the Schrödinger equation?

In this question, the answer says that unitary time evolution means that probability is conserved. Is this the same as saying that a system obeys the Schrödinger equation?
Riemann's user avatar
  • 1,288
2 votes
1 answer
55 views

Non-formal expression for the classical propagator

I'm studying classical molecular dynamics and have come across an object called the classical propagator in the following context. Let $\mathcal{A}(t) = \mathcal{A}(\vec{x}(t))$ be a function on phase-...
Christoph90's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
69 views

Time-ordered exponential operator generated by two commuting Hamiltonians

Define a time-dependent Hamiltonian $$H(t) = H_1(t) + H_2(t),\tag{1}$$ where $$[H_1(t), H_2(t)] = 0 ~ \forall t \in [0,T].\tag{2}$$ Is it true that the unitary operator generated by $H(t)$ is a ...
Mohan's user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
1 answer
50 views

How to calculate pressure $p$ in the Navier-Stokes equation to simulate the time evolution of a fluid?

I wanted to simulate the motion of a fluid (continuously filling the entire space) in a given space, say $3$-dimensional Euclidean space. To calculate the dynamics of fluid motion, I used the Navier-...
Modular Discriminant's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
88 views

Question about the time-ordered exponential operator

I learned that a unitary matrix generated by time-dependent Hamiltonians is written down as \begin{equation} U(t) = \mathcal{T}\exp\Big(-i\int_0^t H(t') dt' \Big),\tag{1} \end{equation} where $\...
Hailey Han's user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
52 views

Can a non-unitary process be made unitary using a transformation or by expanding the phase space?

Suppose I have a matrix differential equation: $$ \frac{d\mathbf{x}}{dt} = A\mathbf{x}$$ The solution to this is $$\mathbf{x}(t) = e^{At}\mathbf{x}(0)$$ If $A^{\dagger}=-A$, then the time evolution ...
figjuice's user avatar
1 vote
2 answers
50 views

Equations of motion and infinitesimal canonical transformations

Currently, I'm diving into infinitesimal canonical transformations, with a particular focus on using the infinitesimal change $\epsilon=\delta t$ and $H$ as our generating function. So, in this ...
Manuel Borra's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
34 views

Interpretation of second-order term in time-dependent perturbation series (Dyson series)

$\newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left \lvert #1 \right \rangle}$ Context Consider a system described by $$H(t) = H_0 + V_0 v(t) \mathcal{O}$$ where $V_0$ defines the strength of a time dependent perturbation, $...
DanielSank's user avatar
  • 24.1k
4 votes
1 answer
153 views

Is the propagator the same as the matrix elements of the time evolution operator?

So Sakurai in their QM book defines the propagator in wave mechanics as: $$K(x'',t;x',t_0)=\sum_{a'}\langle x''\vert a'\rangle \langle a'\vert x'\rangle \exp\left[\dfrac{-iE_{a'}(t-t_0)}{\hbar}\right]....
Pablo García's user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
160 views

The spreading of the wave function and Causality violation

In Hegerfeldt, 1998 paper "Instantaneous Spreading and Einstein Causality in Quantum Theory" he states that, "In nonrelativistic quantum mechanics the immediate spreading of wave ...
TheWhitelily2010's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
20 views

Conditions for the existence of a steady state in time-driven system

Consider an open quantum system given by the Hamiltonian $$H = H_B + H_S(t) + H_{SB}$$ with $B$ denoting the noninteracting bath, $H_S(t)$ the time-dependent noninteracting system and $H_{SB}$ is a ...
Rudolf Smorka's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
99 views

Intuition behind the different collapse terms of the Lindbladian?

A common way to treat dissipative quantum systems is through the use of the Lindblad master equation. Compared to the Schrodinger equation, it has extra non-unitary collapse/jump operators that ...
KF Gauss's user avatar
  • 7,271
0 votes
0 answers
21 views

How can time-evolution lead a Nèel-ordered state to an entangled state?

I am working with a system governed by the Following Hamiltonian: H = $\sum_{i<j} J_{ij}(\sigma_i^+ \sigma_j^- + \sigma_i^- \sigma_j^+) + B\sum_j\sigma_j^z$ The Time evolution is: $|\psi(t)\rangle =...
Dimitri's user avatar
  • 149
2 votes
1 answer
350 views

Is quantum gravity compatible with unitary evolution?

I am thinking that they aren't strictly compatible. I have the following logical argument for this: The unitary evolution postulate says that the state of a system is given by a time-depending state ...
Ryder Rude's user avatar
  • 6,170
9 votes
4 answers
1k views

Time evolution operator in classical mechanics?

Hamilton's equation can be written in terms of Poisson brackets, as follows: $$\dot{q} = \{q,H\}$$ $$\dot{p} = \{p,H\}$$ where $H$ is the Hamiltonian of the system. Now, wikipedia says that the ...
MathMath's user avatar
  • 959
1 vote
0 answers
29 views

Formula from wikipedia relating Heisenberg with Schrödinger pictures [duplicate]

I have a pretty naive question about a formula from wikipedia relating operator $A_H $ in Heisenberg picture with it's equivalent $A_S $ in Schroedinger picture: $$ \frac{d}{dt}A_\text{H}(t)=\frac{...
user267839's user avatar
  • 1,253
0 votes
1 answer
45 views

Discrete-time-dependent Hamiltonian from sequence of unitaries

Consider a system evolving in discrete time with the time evolution given by a some unitary operator $\hat{U}(t)$ that advances the system by one time step, i.e. $$\psi(t+1) = \hat{U}(t)\psi(t).$$ The ...
nsnfn's user avatar
  • 29
2 votes
1 answer
82 views

Self-adjointness, time evolution operator and the role of domains

Introduction Let us consider a Hamiltonian $\hat{H}$ for a certain system and suppose that I would like to know if it is possible to define it (i.e. its domain) in such a way that it results self-...
RH_ss's user avatar
  • 135
2 votes
1 answer
179 views

Commutator in the derivation of the Runge-Gross Theorem

In the derivation of the Runge-Gross theorem, a theorem that states a one-to-one correspondence between potential and density in an evolving system, a commutator appears that I seem to have trouble ...
Jannis Erhard's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
55 views

Time Evolution Operator Explained in The Theoretical Minimum: Quantum Mechanics book

In section 4.4 and 4.5 of "The Theoretical Minimum: Quantum Mechanics" book, there are a explanation about time evolution operator U(t). The author explains that: $U^\dagger (t)U(t) = I$ In ...
Daniel's user avatar
  • 117
2 votes
3 answers
80 views

Time evolution of non-interacting field operators [closed]

I learned that for a non-interacting tight-binding system $H=\sum_{n}\varepsilon_na^\dagger_n a_n$, the time evolution of $a_n$ is simply $a_n(t)=e^{-i\varepsilon_nt}a_n$. I tried to prove this: \...
user835469's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
42 views

Behavior of the temporal part of the wavefunction in an infinite well

I have a question about the behavior of the temporal part of the wavefunction in an infinite well. For reference, the solution given in my textbook for the wavefunction of a particle in an infinite ...
Antoin Roquentin's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
42 views

Evolution of conformal primary operator in spacetime

Let $P$ be the element of conformal algebra (including Poincare) corresponding to infinitesimal spacetime translation. Let $\phi(x)$ be a primary conformal operator, defined as $\phi(0)|0\rangle=|\phi\...
Rescy_'s user avatar
  • 649
0 votes
1 answer
44 views

Time evolution of perturbation

This is from Noelle Pottier's book. I am unclear on how equation 15.1.10 follows from the information that she's given. Is the equation a consequence of inserting equation 15.1.9 in the commutator? ...
R Walser's user avatar
  • 101
1 vote
0 answers
93 views

Clarification on interaction picture in QFT

Say we want to calculate $\langle f(t_2)|O|i(t_1)\rangle$. Where $O$ is an arbitrary operator. We can treat the states as stationary and then evolve the operator $$\langle f(0)|O(t)|i(0)\rangle\\O(t) =...
Obama2020's user avatar
  • 328
3 votes
2 answers
167 views

Free particle propagator, wavefunction not moving problem

I'm learning the QM propagator and the first example is of course the free particle: $\hat{H}=\frac{p^2}{2m}$, then the new wavefunction is found by: $$\psi(x,t)=\int dx_0\;K(x,t;x_0,t_0)\;\psi(x_0,...
Acephalus's user avatar
  • 159
4 votes
1 answer
132 views

Is Hamiltonian being a time evolution operator a consequence of minimizing action?

When I write down the Lagrangian for a quantum field, I can derive the equation of motion for the field. Therefore, Lagrangian specifies how field evolves with time completely. Can I derive ...
Tommy Tsang's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
23 views

Time evolution of Gaussian wave packet in free space with initial condition Dirac delta function [duplicate]

I learn something about the Time evolution of Gaussian wave packet in free space. if the initial condition is a Dirac delta function at $t=0$, then the wave function is $$ \psi (x,t)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\...
Ironman1965's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
42 views

Double change for frame of reference

Is it possible to change frame of references 2 times? Being more specific, if I have a Hamiltonian $$H = H_0 + H_a + H_b,$$ i can go in the interaction picture and have my new interaction picture ...
AndreaMaestri18's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
121 views

Time evolution operator for 2-level system hamiltonian

I'm trying to compute the time evolution operator of a system with the following hamiltonian: $$ H(t) = g(t)[\sigma^+ e^{i \omega t } + \sigma^-e^{-i \omega t }] $$ I tried to use the Magnus expansion,...
AndreaMaestri18's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
34 views

What's the connection between the product of advanced and retarded Green functions and system dynamics in quantum mechanics?

As written in the book Atom-photon interaction by Claude Cohen-Tannoudji, the time-evolution operator can be expressed as the Fourier transform of the Green's function $$ U(\tau)=e^{-iH\tau}=\frac{1}{...
Guoqing's user avatar
  • 216
3 votes
0 answers
84 views

Second-order Trotter error involving an unbounded Hamiltonian

I have an Hamiltonian of this form: \begin{equation} H = \frac{p^2}{2m} + V(x), \end{equation} I would like to approximate the time evolution for a time $\tau$ of a known initial Gaussian state $|\...
Luke's user avatar
  • 121
2 votes
1 answer
163 views

Time evolution operator in quantum mechanics

One of the postulates of quantum mechanics is that, given a quantum state $\psi_{0}$ at time $t=0$, the state of the system at a posterior time $t > 0$ is given by $\psi_{t} = e^{-iHt}\psi_{0}$, ...
IamWill's user avatar
  • 671
0 votes
0 answers
51 views

Showing that interaction and Schrödinger pictures are equivalent -- does the result hold without commutativity?

I am trying to show that the interaction picture represents a valid picture. We use this picture when our Hamiltonian takes the form $H = H_0 +H_1$. "Valid" means that it should reproduce ...
EE18's user avatar
  • 1,135
2 votes
0 answers
40 views

Are von Neumann entropies of complementary but physically distinct subsystems in time-dependent settings identical?

We assume a quantum system AB with subsystems A and B and take the Schmidt decomposition of a state $\vert\psi_{AB}\rangle=\sum_i\lambda_i \vert a_i\rangle\vert b_i\rangle$ defined on the compsite ...
ewf's user avatar
  • 184
0 votes
1 answer
144 views

The evolution of observables in the Heisenberg picture

Suppose that a system $S$ undergoes the following time-evolution: $t_{1} \rightarrow t_{2}: |x_{a}\rangle \rightarrow \sum c_{i}|x_{i}\rangle$, where $|x_{a}\rangle$ and each of $|x_{i}\rangle$ is a ...
Lory's user avatar
  • 996

1
2 3 4 5
16