Questions tagged [effective-field-theory]

An effective field theory is a systematic approximation for an underlying quantum field theory or a statistical model that includes the appropriate degrees of freedom of phenomena occurring at a chosen length scale (or energy scale), while ignoring substructure and degrees of freedom at shorter distances (or higher energies), summarizing those in its parameters.

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
0 answers
24 views

Kinetic mixing, and a bare mass?

I've been reading the following classic paper by Bob Holdom "Two U(1)s and $\epsilon$ charge shifts", and I'm attepting to derive the expression for $\chi$. In particular, I am computing the ...
Guy's user avatar
  • 1,231
2 votes
1 answer
50 views

Linearization of $\beta$-functions around Gaussian fixed points

I was reading section 8.4.4 of the book "Condensed Matter Field Theory" by Altland & Simons and I ended up with a very specific question that I couldn't resolve. After finding the ...
Jimeens's user avatar
  • 139
0 votes
0 answers
13 views

Spontaneous emission as dissipation and fluctuation

Suppose we have some sort of medium and we want to build an effective theory of light inside. Of course we want to calculation the dielectric constant, which in turn is determined by the ...
jywu's user avatar
  • 301
2 votes
1 answer
82 views

Standard model and gravity gauge theory

I will briefly explain my understanding on the subject. In the following explanation i refer to the Poincarè group meaning the group: $$\mathcal{P}_{1,3} = \mathbb{R}^{1,3} \rtimes Spin^+(1,3)$$ The ...
LolloBoldo's user avatar
  • 1,104
1 vote
0 answers
40 views

What can an EFT tell one about the ''underlying'' theory?

I was reading about effective field theories and wondering how much an EFT can tell you about the ''underlying'' theory which is then reflected in the EFT. Can one extrapolate back from what one sees ...
Tom's user avatar
  • 1,071
3 votes
2 answers
103 views

A question on Schwartz's derivation of the Euler-Heisenberg Lagrangian

In Subsection 33.2.2. of Schwartz's Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, he starts to derive the Euler-Heisenberg effective Lagrangian by "replacing" the field which is being ...
EuYu's user avatar
  • 1,214
0 votes
0 answers
31 views

Conformal manifold of a supersymmetric field theory

I'm trying to understand what exactly is the conformal manifold of a theory. If I understand it right, the conformal manifold is the space of couplings. From that point of view, it is just a subset ...
xpsf's user avatar
  • 1,003
4 votes
0 answers
89 views

Justification for the derivative expansion in the Exact Renormalization Group

In the Exact Renormalization Group formalism, specifically the formalism of Wetterich, one writes down an evolution equation for the effective average action $\Gamma_k[\varphi]$, see f.ex $$ \...
Martin Johnsrud's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
257 views

Kinetic Terms for Interacting Massive Vector Field

The kinetic term in the standard Lagrangian for a vector field, whether massive or not, is $$-\frac{1}{4}F^{\alpha\beta}F_{\alpha\beta}=-\frac{1}{2}(\partial_\alpha V_\beta \partial^\alpha V^\beta - \...
Ahron Maline's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
43 views

When to consider and when not to consider the loop contributions from light quarks?

Consider the following Lagrangian: $$ \tag 1 \mathcal{L} = \frac{\partial_{\mu}a(x)}{f}\sum_{q}\bar{q}\gamma^{\mu}\gamma_{5}q $$ This is a Lagrangian of the axion-like particles (ALPs) $a$ interacting ...
Name YYY's user avatar
  • 8,888
1 vote
0 answers
58 views

Effective field theory of massive spin-1 and spin-2

I'd like to understand what could be the use of an effective field theory (EFT) of a single massive particle of spin 1 or 2, or simple modification of these (see below). By EFT, I mean the most ...
Rubilax96's user avatar
  • 145
3 votes
1 answer
61 views

Thirring Model effective potential

I have the lagrangian for the Thirring model coupled with vector interaction $V^\mu$ in the large-$N$ approximation: \begin{equation} \mathscr{L}=\bar{\psi}\left(i \gamma^\mu\partial_\mu-m - \gamma_\...
Everlin Martins's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
82 views

Do irrelevant directions contribute to the IR dynamics?

Is it not a misnomer to call in a non-perturbative setting an irrelevant direction irrelevant? I know that it comes from perturbation theory where an irrelevant direction is irrelevant for the IR ...
Silas's user avatar
  • 480
3 votes
0 answers
55 views

Beta function of $\phi^4$ from RG equation

I am currently following David Tongs lecture notes on statistical field theory (Link to the script) and I have an issue with the calculation of the beta-function from the RG equations (equation (3.45))...
VerwirrterStudent's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
67 views

Indices of $(\text{Riem})^3$?

This question relates to writing higher curvature terms in momentum space with respect to GR as an effective field theory. I know that $R_{\alpha\beta\mu\nu} \sim \partial_\beta\partial_\mu h_{\alpha\...
MathZilla's user avatar
  • 433
0 votes
0 answers
58 views

How does the renormalization process differ between actions with and without diffeomorphism invariance?

If I have an action that is not invariant under a change of coordinates. Does this effect the renormalizability of the theory? The procedure of renormalizing a field theory essentially boils down to ...
PhysicsStudent101's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
52 views

Simple examples of compactification [closed]

I am starting out on some research and I am trying to find basic examples of compactification to start off with, and then I want to work my way up to more complicated items such as having an action ...
MathZilla's user avatar
  • 433
3 votes
0 answers
58 views

Renormalization of Two Scalar Field Theory at Tree-Level and One-Loop Levels

I have been given a problem on renormalization, but due to my inexperience, I don't understand what to do with it. Here is the statement: Consider a theory of two real scalar fields $\phi$ and $\Phi$ ...
NB.que's user avatar
  • 31
10 votes
3 answers
394 views

Is a QFT always an EFT coming from something deeper?

(I have already read this post but my question is different) Reading Ch. 12 of Weinberg's Quantum Field Theory Vol. 1, he states that all realistic (interacting) QFTs are now believed to be EFT of ...
LolloBoldo's user avatar
  • 1,104
4 votes
1 answer
88 views

Degree of divergence of subdiagram

The proof of the Appelquist-Carazzone theorem involves analyzing the behaviour of an internal subdiagram which is a fermion loop with $F$ incoming vector lines. The mass of the fermion is assumed much ...
GaloisFan's user avatar
  • 1,623
0 votes
0 answers
31 views

Looking for examples of Polchinski's ERG

This question is related to my older question on the Exact Renormalization Group. I've read through the first half the Rosten review (https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1366) and the Bervillier paper (https://...
2 votes
1 answer
59 views

Are large logarithms tied to dimensional regularization?

When introducing the renormalization group many textbooks start by stating that scattering amplitudes often contain logarithms of the form $\log\frac{\mu^2}{p^2}$, where $p^2$ is the characteristic ...
F.Burton's user avatar
  • 133
3 votes
0 answers
41 views

Calculation of a RG-transformed energy functional

Consider the Landau-Wilson energy functional in a constant magnetic field: $$E[m] = \int d^dx \left[\frac{1}{2} \vec\partial m(x))^2+ \frac{1}{2} r_0 m^2(x) + u_0m^4(x) + hm(x)\right]$$ We will ...
Olandelie's user avatar
6 votes
0 answers
95 views

Conceptual dobuts about EFTs and the decoupling of heavy fields

I've tried to synthetize some of my misconceptions in the following statements. I just like to know which of them are true and get some intution about them. EFTs exist only if heavy fields decouple (...
JuanC97's user avatar
  • 256
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Exact Renormalization Group

I'm studying the Exact Renormalization Group in QFT. I've found some pretty OK references already (see https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0002034 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1003.1366), but I was wondering if ...
1 vote
0 answers
31 views

Observables and RG flow

I am confused about a standard thing regarding renormalization group eqn. The primary motivation of writing the RG eqns are observables do not depend on the UV cutoff $\Lambda$ (Wilsonian) or ...
Tanmoy Pati's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
128 views

Wilsonian RG vs. continuum RG

As far as I understand one classifies the renormalization group (RG) into the Wilsonian RG and the continuum RG. The Wilsonian RG gives finite predictions by introducing a cutoff $\Lambda$ and absorbs ...
Silas's user avatar
  • 480
1 vote
0 answers
56 views

Studying the Renormalizability of classically equivalent theories

I am currently studying the effect that a massive, uncharged, non-minimally coupled spin $\frac{1}{2}$ field has on the background geometry upon quantization, and compare this with results in General ...
modellatore's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
24 views

Wilsonian renormalisation / Polchinski renormalisation equation. Why is the factor in the kinetic term infinite for large momenta?

For Polchinski renormalisation equation, a smooth cutoff is introduced that is essentially a factor of $ 1 $ up until the cutoff region in the kinetic term. Beyond this "cutting-off" region (...
TT Farreo's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
63 views

Asymptotic freedom of the $\phi^4$ theory depending on spacetime dimensions?

I heard that $\phi^4$ theory in $4-$dimensions is NOT asymptotically free. But in lower dimensions like $2$ and $3$, it is said to be asymptotically free. However, what confuses me is that in $3-$...
Keith's user avatar
  • 1,341
0 votes
2 answers
78 views

Derivative of a "particle" field

Working with Lagrangian we often encounter derivatives of particles fields, for example let's consider the first term of the LO chiral Lagrangian $$ \mathcal{L}_{B\phi}^{LO}=\text{Tr}[\overline{B}(i\...
Schiele's user avatar
  • 145
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

EFT operators to Feynman Diagrams

I have this paper arXiv:1410.4193 which contains a complete list of pre-EWSB dimension-7 EFT operators, and I have taken them and 'converted' them to post-EWSB operators. As an example, from the $\psi^...
Depenau's user avatar
  • 365
1 vote
1 answer
107 views

Asymptotic Freedom and the Continuum Limit

Suppose I have a family of effective field theories, parametrized by a cut-off $\Lambda$ and a coupling constant $g$ and specified in terms of generating functionals $Z_{\Lambda,g}(J)$. Asymptotic ...
Nullstein's user avatar
  • 169
4 votes
2 answers
246 views

Wilsonian effective field theories and renormalization due to marginal and irrelevant operators

In the top-down approach, e.g., Fermi interaction obtained from EW Lagrangian, the loop corrections (using dimensional regularization) and renormalization of $G_F$ are done using the full EW ...
Rajat Mondal's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
95 views

How to read renormalization group flow plots?

From what I know, the renormalization group tells us how the coupling constants of a theory change as the energy scale is varied. Thus as you vary the energy scale you trace out a path or flow in the ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 2,182
5 votes
1 answer
167 views

Trouble understanding Wilsonian renormalization

I have been attempting to go through Chapter 12 of Peskin & Schroeder, but I have been having a very tough time. In particular I have been having trouble following this chapter much beyond page ...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 2,182
7 votes
0 answers
97 views

Uniqueness of high temperature RG fixed point

Given a $\phi^4$ theory in $d<4$ $$S_{\Lambda} = \int d^dx \left[\frac{1}{2}(\partial_i \phi)^2 + \frac{1}{2} \mu_0^2 \phi^2 + \Lambda^{d-4} \tilde{g}_0 \phi^4 \right]\,,$$ the corresponding RG ...
neutrinØ's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
32 views

Consistency of One-Pion Exchange with Selection Rules for NN Pion Production (in Chiral EFT, e.g.)

Hope you're ready for a long question, but I think quite an interesting one! One-pion exchange is an established nucleon-nucleon potential which is well-defined for any joint angular momentum state of ...
Graham Van Goffrier's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
28 views

How to compute the susceptibility of the Polyakov loop in Monte Carlo lattice field theory?

I am having troubles understanding the definition of the susceptibility of the Polyakov loop give, for example, in the book by Gattringer, Lang "Quantum Chromodynamics on the Lattice", page ...
EigenAle's user avatar
  • 165
0 votes
0 answers
151 views

Are all QFTs, EFTs?

Is every Quantum Field theory, including CFTs, an Effective Field Theory? Can every interacting CFT become the infra-red fixed point of some high energy QFT?
Bastam Tajik's user avatar
  • 1,275
3 votes
2 answers
189 views

Integrating high momentum modes using Wilson's approach to renormalization

In Section 12.1 of Peskin & Schroeder, they introduce the renormalization group for $\phi^4$ theory. Let $b < 1$ and $\Lambda$ some UV cutoff. Define $$\hat{\phi} = \begin{cases} \phi(k) , \...
CBBAM's user avatar
  • 2,182
1 vote
0 answers
52 views

Wilson Coefficients in the Standard Model

I'm not particularly knowledgeable in this area of physics. From my understanding as an undergraduate, Wilson coefficients are sets of parameters that arise from an effective field theory which ...
probablysid's user avatar
2 votes
2 answers
88 views

Why rescale the kinetic term in Wilsonian renormalization?

I have been doing some reading on Wilsonian renormalization and also Effective Field Theories. It's my understanding, and I could be wrong, that part of the process is to continually rescale the ...
Cory's user avatar
  • 123
3 votes
0 answers
146 views

Do unresummed self-energy functions spoil RGE resummation?

I am aware, that the solution of the $\beta$-function contains a resummation of all large logarithms, but I fail to understand how this is actually relevant: The coupling constant is not an observable ...
staxyz's user avatar
  • 41
0 votes
1 answer
90 views

Understanding this abstract Lagrangian of effective field theory

I'm learning Wilson's approach to renormalization and the Effective Field Theory. Typically, the theory is defined by a Lagrangian valid up to some scale $Λ$. I saw these two definitions for 4-...
IGY's user avatar
  • 1,545
3 votes
1 answer
100 views

Renormalization of quark bilinears

I'm looking at the one-loop corrections to the amputated quark two-point functions ($\Gamma_i$) with insertions of quark bilinears (indexed by $i\in\{S,P,V,A,T\}$) with off-shell legs in Euclidean QCD....
y9QQ's user avatar
  • 71
15 votes
1 answer
2k views

What theory are we actually working in when "using" QED?

My understanding of QED is roughly that (please correct me if I have made a mistake, I am not very experienced in QFT): Firstly, QED is not exact. At a certain energy scale, we have electroweak ...
S.R.'s user avatar
  • 151
2 votes
1 answer
104 views

Is $\phi^5$ a descendant in $\phi^4$-theory (at the conformal Wilson-Fisher fixed point)?

I'm wondering if $\phi^5$ is a descendant in $\phi^4$-theory in $d = 4 - \epsilon$ at the conformal Wilson-Fisher fixed point, where the coupling constant is $\lambda$. The e.o.m. tells us that $\phi^...
A.Dunder's user avatar
  • 391
1 vote
0 answers
64 views

Effective Theory for Matter Fields Coupled to a Chern-Simons Field

Assuming that matter fields coupled with the background Chern-Simons field (or Maxwell-Chern-Simons field), I want to obtain the effective theory in terms of matter fields only, by integrating out a ...
3 votes
1 answer
99 views

$\rm Tr[log( )]$ calculation to go from BCS to Ginzburg-Landau

It seems like calculating the effective action $|\Delta|^2 + Tr[ln(G^{-1})]$ give the Ginzburg Landau action. \begin{equation} G^{-1} =\begin{pmatrix} i\partial_t - H & \Delta \\ \Delta^* & i\...
user347244's user avatar

1
2 3 4 5
8