0
$\begingroup$

In photography, it's well known that reducing the aperture leads to the starburst effect, like in the following photo:

sample photo with a starburst (source)

This happens due to diffraction on the aperture, which has a polygonal shape when closed. The smaller the aperture, the wider the spikes. This is easy to understand, because this is the case of Fraunhofer diffraction, where the far field is basically the Fourier transform of the aperture indicator function.

Now, there's something strange that I observe with my own human eyes. The experiment goes as follows.

  1. Long after sunset get your eyesight adapted to a well-lit room.
  2. Turn off room lights and extra light sources like e.g. computer monitor, so that the room is dark, this will make your eye pupils maximally wide.
  3. Come to a window and look at the faraway street lights. You'll see the spikes similar to the photo above, but less regular (we don't have so regular polygons in our eyes as photo cameras do :) ).
  4. Up to this point everything seems fine. Now take a bright source of light (e.g. phone display with max brightness) and, without obscuring the city lights, bring it close to the eyes, so as to activate pupillary light reflex. DON'T HARM YOURSELF! Use your common sense regarding brightness of the display of your particular device (some high-end phones have really bright displays)!
  5. What you'll see will be the opposite to what happens when you close the aperture in a camera: the diffraction spikes will smoothly shrink. The shrinkage starts exactly when you feel your iris sphincter muscle activate.
  6. You can check that this is not simply veiling glare effect: move the light away from the eyes, and the spikes will smoothly grow back. I.e. you'll still see them small for some time.
  7. You can also check that it's not a (de)focusing effect: try e.g. focusing at your window, still keeping the street light at the same point in sight (maybe obscuring it for one eye to make it easier to do). The defocused street light will look very different from the most spiky version of the focused image.

I can sometimes consciously play with the width of my pupils in the dark (this is an elusive ability, due to the indirect nature of control over iris muscles), and the effect is exactly the same, which confirms that this is not due to veiling glare or similar masking effects.

What makes me wonder is the observation in step 5: why does constricting pupil lead to lessening of the diffraction smearing of the light sources? Shouldn't it behave similarly to photographic systems, where the smearing increases?

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Don't forget that you also let way less light in :) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2021 at 17:36
  • $\begingroup$ @OfekGillon yeah, too bad one can't easily measure raw linear values of spatial distribution of illuminance at the retina, so cooked data are the only available information... $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Aug 27, 2021 at 19:46
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, I think people already got artificial retinas installed with electrodes that can be used to "see" what they see. Did you check it out? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 27, 2021 at 21:18
  • $\begingroup$ @OfekGillon no, I didn't think of this. Do you know of any paper about such measurements? Though, IIRC, these retinas had extremely poor resolution (like several pixels per eye), so this might not be useful. $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Aug 27, 2021 at 21:20
  • $\begingroup$ Hmm, I think I'm wrong about the origin of the spikes I see with my eyes. The way they behave when I e.g. partially obscure the eye resembles more spherical aberration — maybe somewhat non-uniform, which leads to (curved!) spikes instead of smooth glare. Diffraction spikes shouldn't be so curved. $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Aug 27, 2021 at 22:08

3 Answers 3

0
$\begingroup$

I think when the iris is wider you could be seeing diffraction from hairs on your eyelids (eyelashes), and when the iris is smaller it isn’t looking ‘past’ the hairs so you don’t see them. I’m just wondering why we don’t see diffraction softening as in cameras when using a small (bigger number) aperture

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ No, it's definitely not this. I do see diffraction spikes perpendicular to eyelashes, but they never have any other orientation than perpendicular to eyelashes. The spikes I'm asking about in the question happen even with the widest-open eyes—when all diffraction spikes from eyelashes disappear—and with the size dynamics as described in the OP. $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Jul 2, 2023 at 18:05
0
$\begingroup$

Its probably the effect of switching from low intensity gray receptors to normal colour receptors, that don't register the spikes.

With an open iris and higher overall intensity inside the eye by reflections, the signal of the gray level intensity cells are switched off by saturation. In the state of saturation the single photon detection by receptors does not work anymore. This is the effect, that makes is possible to see by starlight only even in the dark of the forest.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ The color remains the same during the elongation of the spikes, moreover, they are easily observable by central vision—the fovea—where there are no rods. $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Mar 31 at 7:59
0
$\begingroup$

The radial diffraction spikes seen by normal human eyes around bright point sources are called ciliary corona. They can be seen when the apparent diameter of the point source is less than 20' (so the Sun is too big for producing ciliary corona, although kids like to add radial spikes when drawing the Sun). The diffraction spikes are due to thousands of small scatterers in the eye lens, protein aggregates with a size of about 1 μm. You can simulate the ciliary corona by looking through a glass powdered with fine lycopodium powder.

Dilation of the pupil of the eye should not have a huge impact on ciliary corona, but if the pupil of the eye dilates, another diffraction phenomenon, which is brighter, may appear: lenticular halo.

For a simulation of ciliary corona see figure 4 in this study.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ OK, ciliary corona is something I had seen indeed, this fine mesh of colorful radial spikes. What I'm describing in the OP is more "macroscopic": it's visible around the Moon, for example, with the spikes being a couple lunar diameters long when the pupil is the widest, and it's not as round as the lenticular halo (which I may have seen too, as a faint colored edge of the halo around a nearby street light). $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Mar 31 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.