3
$\begingroup$

When we wave our hand really fast, we see several facades of it tagging behind. What causes this? I sense this has something to do with the persistence of vision of our eye similar to what happens in Newton's disc.

Also when done in dim light, these copies are seen very clearly, but not as much in brighter light. How does the light intensity play a role here?

$\endgroup$
10
  • $\begingroup$ I wasn't familiar with this phenomenon, so I tried to reproduce it myself. Whether in bright or dim light, I was only able to see one copy of my hand at a time — no "facades." I am curious if you have any other accounts of people observing this. $\endgroup$
    – d_b
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 4:10
  • $\begingroup$ @d_b it does.. and as OP mentioned it becomes clear in dimmer light but not brighter tho.. $\endgroup$
    – Ankit
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 5:41
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ What sort of light? Sunlight, a flame, electric lamp, etc? If you are using A/C powered artificial light then there may be a strobe effect. $\endgroup$
    – badjohn
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 6:25
  • $\begingroup$ @badjohn I had bright(white) LED tubelight and and a dim (orange-yellow) LED bulb $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 7:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This does not just happen with A/C power. You can reproduce this in sunlight as well. This has more to do with the human vision system and how the brain interprets it, than about some principle of physics $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 11:59

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

LEDs are usually powered with some nominal current, and dimmed by applying PWM to the current source output, rather than by continuously varying the current. In such a scenario, maximum brightness is achieved with 100% duty cycle, where no blinking happens at all, while minimum brightness can have a very low duty cycle, like 1%.

This means that a dimly-lit LED will light your hand only 1% of time. Suppose your hand is currently lit. This is the state when you see it first. Then after the lighting is turned off, some time passes while you can't see the hand move further. At the next PWM cycle the hand is lit again, and so on. This makes you see a "dashed" form of the motion blur. Another example would be if a fly or other insect flies by, you'll see it as if there's a train of flies, with the tail fading.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ To test the hypothesis that the effect is due to strobing, one might set up some variable-speed rotor and look for a version of the stationary helicopter blade effect. I just tried with a cheap box fan, where I can adjust the rotation speed by squeezing the plastic case and adding friction, but I’m not sure it spins fast enough to strobe under my 60Hz lights. Some cheap toys might work. Consider a follow-up question tagged home-experiment. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 22:06
  • $\begingroup$ @rob good LED lighting doesn't normally use 60 Hz PWM: it would be worse than incandescent bulbs that flicker at 120 Hz. Cheap LED bulbs do though. But you can try with a mobile phone display — at least all the AMOLED screens I checked, even on flagship Samsung phones, do flicker at something like 50 Hz when at small brightness. $\endgroup$
    – Ruslan
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 22:18
  • $\begingroup$ In my experience, incandescent bulbs generally don’t have enough subsecond temperature variation to flicker at all, but fluorescents with cheap phosphors were famously terrible about causing strobe effects. Of course you’re right that all but the cheapest mains-powered LEDS will have some rectifier to use both halves of the alternating current. But also you can use a rotor with spokes to see the strobe effect at a lower rotor frequency. My other comment got too long to discuss factors of two. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 23:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.