0
$\begingroup$

Not a physicist. Hope to clarify some conceptual issues I have with non-linear propagation of light through a medium, since I seem to be mixing up some very fundamental concepts. Specifically, I am having some doubts regarding the chirping that occurs during, for example, self phase modulation of a wave propagating through a non-linear medium (or even chromatic dispersion).

Here is my current understanding: since only the index of the material is changing during SPM, I guess there isn't any generation of photons at different frequencies. A linear change in index across a propagating pulse, however, introduces an additional linear phase component such that the frequency is effectively increased/decreased. By the same argument, an added quadratic phase component across the pulse yields a chirp across the pulse.

I am having trouble reconciling these two things. Intuitively, I think it's just a mix-up between frequency and wavelength, but I'd like to make it clear. However, then, if I measure a pulse after propagating through a medium (assuming only SPM) via e.g. heterodyne detection, should I observe new frequency components? Or alternatively, if probed with an optical spectrum analyzer, will the bandwidth increase?

Thanks

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

Self-phase modulation very much does generate new frequency components. In fact, SPM is one of the leading ways to produce spectral broadening, all the way through to supercontinuum generation.

To be concrete:

Or alternatively, if probed with an optical spectrum analyzer, will the bandwidth increase?

very much so. This is an everyday tool, and an everyday way to benchmark that the tool is working correctly.

So, where's the problem?

since only the index of the material is changing during SPM, I guess there isn't any generation of photons at different frequencies.

This line of argument doesn't really work. If you want to work on a photon picture, then the core process is that two photons at the original frequency $\omega_0$ are "absorbed", and immediately re-emitted as two photons of frequency $\omega_0 \pm \delta\omega$, with $\delta\omega$ covering a small continuum. (This process is then repeated over and over as the pulse propagates through the material.)

However, that said, this photon picture is tricky to work with and to pin down correctly -- not least because SPM only works for a pulse with a nonzero original bandwidth. It's generally much better to stick to the time-domain view, where the dynamics are much clearer.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this was really helpful. It's still hard for me to reconcile with the photon picture, but I guess I can sort of understand it, since non-linear optics imply a non-linear relationship between the polarization of the medium and the applied electric field... Just as an added clarification: In the case of linear phenomena, however, such as Group Velocity Dispersion, there isn't any generation of new frequencies, right? Only a re-ordering of the existing transform-limited bandwidth over a longer time, I suppose? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 21, 2020 at 14:05
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is correct - linear phenomena cannot generate any new frequencies. This can be shown rigorously using linearity and the fact that the response to a monochromatic forcing is always at that same frequency. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 21, 2020 at 14:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.