15
$\begingroup$

Today I noticed the weird reflection pattern on a river on my way to school. As can be seen from the picture, the surface seems rough somewhere and smooth somewhere else. My question is: What causes this amazing phenomenon?

enter image description here

enter image description here

Some extra information:

  1. The pattern is steady, or at least the change is so slow that cannot be detected by naked eyes.
  2. Location: East China Normal University(Minhang Campus), Shanghai, China.

Clarification:

This question is not a duplicate of that one, because:

  1. The phenomenon described in this question only appears then it's rainy, while the lake surface always "appears darker in some areas".
  2. Darken surface is only observed "at the far area", and patches in my question is within 10 meters of me.
  3. The accepted answer to that question is "an interplay between the wind and the shoreline", but wind cannot produce a steady pattern.
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Wind puffs I believe. As a sailor I can tell you that I always look for these patches because that's where there is stronger breeze. As a side note, they're easier to see with polarized sunglasses. $\endgroup$ – Ulthran Sep 7 '16 at 2:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Ulthran But how can wind produce a steady pattern? $\endgroup$ – nalzok Sep 7 '16 at 2:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Some water waves are associated with circular motion, and those are often seen as gentle swells in deep water, but turn to choppy waves in shallow. It might be that the depth of the riverbed is reflected in the texture above. $\endgroup$ – Whit3rd Sep 7 '16 at 7:57
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Possible duplicate of Why does the lake surface appear darker in some areas? $\endgroup$ – Sergei Patiakin Sep 12 '16 at 8:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @peterh These two questions are related, but I think my question is at least partially different from that one. $\endgroup$ – nalzok Sep 12 '16 at 11:28
8
$\begingroup$

It looks like those patches consist of wave patterns of much shorter wavelength than the rest of the river/lake. This could be an effect of capillary waves which are driven by wind/rain, while the oscillation itself is sustained by capillary forces.

Water wave theory conceptualizes waves as either being governed by gravity or capillary forces. Le Mehaute, "An introduction to hydrodynamics and water waves" is a wonderful book that explains those concepts with passion and detail. Gravity waves follow the dispersion relation $$ w(k) = \sqrt{gk\cdot\tanh{kd}} $$ with water depth $d$, angular frequency $\omega$ and wave number $k\propto1/L$. The interesting point here is that the wave's celerity (velocity) $c=\omega/k$ depends on water depth, $c\propto\sqrt{d}$ only under shallow conditions, $d/L\to0$ (because $\tanh{x}=x$ for $x\to0$). While it does not under deep-water conditions, $c\propto\sqrt{L}$ for $d\to\infty$. Wave crests at the beach are the best illustration for this effect, as the deep-water waves are approaching shallow terrain and thus get slowed down, while their crest (at higher $d$) is still fast.

Note also that shallow-water waves are non-dispersive (celerity does not depend on wavelength), which could explain a longer persistent wave pattern compared to deep water waves.

In contrast, capillary waves are only driven by surface curvature effects. Their short wavelengths justify the deep-water approximation $d\gg L$ in almost any water body, which leads to the dispersion relation $$ \omega(k) = \sqrt{k^3\sigma/\rho} $$

Their combined behaviour can be described as a dispersion relation for capillary-gravity waves, which is illustrated in the following sketch:

enter image description here

This curve shows a critical wavelength $L_\text{crit}\approx 1.7$ cm and a minimum celerity (speed) $c_\text{min}=\sqrt[4]{4g\frac{\sigma}{\rho}}\approx 23$ cm/s for water of typical surface tension $\sigma=0.073$ N/m and density $\rho=1025$ kg/m$^3$.

I would hypothesize that the patches that you see consist of waves oscillating around the critical wave length of 1.7 cm and below, where capillary forces determine the nice looking short-wave pattern. Consequently, this part of the river can be interpreted as deep water, while smoother/longer waves indicate non-dispersive low-velocity waves, $c\propto\sqrt{d}$, in shallow water.

It seems that this approach could make sense with respect to the patterns in your images and the likely topography below the surface. But also under-water plants and vegetation will certainly have an effect, though.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.