3
$\begingroup$

From this question we find that given a noisy process $x(t)$ with known spectral density $S_x(\omega)$, the mean square displacement is $$ \langle x(t)^2 \rangle = t^2 \int_0^\infty S_\dot{x}(\omega) \left( \frac{\sin(\omega t / 2)}{\omega t / 2} \right)^2 \frac{d \omega}{2\pi} \, . \tag{1} $$ where $S_\dot{x}$ is the spectral density of the velocity of $x$. Suppose $$ S_x(\omega)= \begin{cases} S \quad \text{for }\omega \leq \Omega \\ 0 \quad \text{otherwise} \end{cases} $$ In that case, and assuming that $S_\dot{x} = \omega^2 S_x$, we find $$ \langle x(t)^2 \rangle = 2 S \Omega \left( 1 - \frac{\sin(\Omega t)}{\Omega t} \right) \, . \tag{2} $$ I don't like that in the limit $t \rightarrow \infty$ it seems that $\langle x(t)^2 \rangle$ goes to a constant. Intuitively, I would think that if we allow $x$ to wander around for a long time, it should drift increasingly far away from the starting point.

One of the following must be true:

  1. Eq. (1) is incorrect.
  2. I made a mistake doing the integral and expression (2) is incorrect.
  3. My assumption that $S_\dot{x}(\omega) = \omega^2 S_x(\omega)$ is incorrect.
  4. Everything was done correctly and it's true that the mean displacement goes to a constant in the long time limit.

Which is it?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ "... I would think that if we allow x to wander around for a long time, it should drift increasingly far away from the starting point." You have already forced the variance to be finite by setting $S_x(\omega) >0$ for $\Omega < \omega < \infty$ $\endgroup$
    – hyportnex
    Commented Sep 5 at 9:22
  • $\begingroup$ @hyportnex, ah, you're right. My intuition was coming from the idea that the velocity process were flat up to $\Omega$, but of course it's not. The spectral density of the velocity process is zero at $\omega=0$. I think this makes sense now. $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Sep 5 at 14:58

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

It looks fine to me. 2. and 3. are surely correct. 1 seems good too from your link and works well for a Wiener process where you indeed find that from your formula that MSD$\sim t$.

Concerning your example, it's pretty far from a regular Brownian motion. If we have the following Brownian motion, with $\eta$ a Gaussian random noise:

$$\dot x(t) = \eta(t)\tag 1$$

We obtain: $S_{x}(w) = S_\eta(w)/w^2$. In your case, this would imply that the noise has a spectrum:

$$S_\eta(w) = S\Theta(\Omega-|w|)w^2 \tag 2$$

And thus an auto-correlation (for $t>0$):

$$S_{\eta}(t) = S\dfrac{4t\Omega \cos(t\Omega)+2((t\Omega)^2-2)\sin(t\Omega)}{t^3} \tag 3$$

I'm sure the double integral required to obtain the MSD from (3) can be done, but I'm lazy so I just asked python to do it numerically (see edit). And here is what we obtain ($S = 1$ and $\Omega = 1$):

![![enter image description here

So your formula is indeed right! As a rule of thumb, any system driven by a noise with power law autocorrelation will display highly non diffusive behavior (usually you obtain sub or super diffusion, not "no diffusion at all"). Here the finite MSD, I think is due to the fact that your noise can easily be anticorrelated which implies that if you start to explore some region, it is highly likely that in the future you will just go back to where you were before.

Edit

Just for completeness, I'll do the integral (which in any case is already done in your linked post):

$$MSD(t) = \int_0^t\int_0^tS_\eta(|t'-t''|)dt'dt''.$$

By symmetry:

$$MSD(t) = 2\int_0^tS_\eta(u)(t-u)du=2S\Omega(1-\text{sinc}(\Omega t))$$

as expected.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you. I'm going to wait a day or so for other answers but will likely accept this one. $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Sep 5 at 15:00
  • $\begingroup$ I have a few questions. 1) What is "MSD"? 2) I'm not sure I follow the logic. You're taking a case where $\dot{x}(t) = \eta(t)$ and then solving for the properties of $\eta$ such that the spectral density of $S$ satisfies the case described in the question. Ok, but what is plotted? Is that the MSD of $\eta$ or the MSD of $x$? $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Sep 11 at 21:10
  • $\begingroup$ MSD = mean square displacement = $\langle x(t)^2\rangle$ $\endgroup$
    – Syrocco
    Commented Sep 11 at 21:18
  • $\begingroup$ And the formula $\dot x = \eta(t)$ is really just to say that the system is driven by some noise in an overdamped case. It is equivalent to your definition of the velocity having some power spectrum! This velocity spectrum being equal to the noise spectrum in the free overdamped case. $\endgroup$
    – Syrocco
    Commented Sep 11 at 21:23
  • $\begingroup$ Ohhhh, ok so the plot is for $x$, not for $\eta$. Now things make sense. $\endgroup$
    – DanielSank
    Commented Sep 12 at 4:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.