Let I be the current flowing across some junction as a result of N charge carriers of charge q. And let $\langle I (t) \rangle$ be its average.
Assume a particle number distribution such that its fluctuation is given by $\langle (\Delta N)^2 \rangle=\langle N\rangle$.
So $\langle I\rangle = q \langle N \rangle$ and by definition of the correlation function $K_I(\tau)=\langle (\Delta I)^2 \rangle$ (where $\tau$ be the time difference $t' - t$) we have
$$ K_f(\tau)= q \langle I\rangle $$
Simplifying this comes from the fact that the charge carriers flow randomly and independently. So we use the following:
Let the spectral density of fluctuations be defined as the Fourier transform of the correlation function $K_f(\tau)$
$$ S_I(\omega) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} K_f(\tau) e^{i \omega \tau} d\tau $$
The random and independent nature of the system means that this is a delta-correlated process, where we have $S_f(\omega)= constant = S_f(0)$,
so that via an inverse fourier transform we have
\begin{eqnarray} K_I(\tau) &=& 2\pi S_I(0) \delta(\tau) \\ &=& 2 \pi \bigg(\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} K_f(\tau) e^{i 0 \tau} d\tau \bigg) \delta(\tau) \\ &=& \int_{- \infty}^{\infty} K_f(\tau) d\tau \delta(\tau) \\ &=& K_f(0) \delta(\tau) \\ \end{eqnarray}
I am trying to understand if this next step I take is legitimate:
Could I not rearrange the first line of the above equation to say
\begin{eqnarray} K_I(\tau) &=& 2\pi S_I(0) \delta(\tau) \\ q \langle I\rangle &=& 2\pi S_I(0) \delta(\tau) \\ \frac{q \langle I\rangle}{2\pi \delta(\tau)} &=& S_I(0) \end{eqnarray}
I hope this is more clear now.
My motivation behind the original question
if , for an average quantity $\langle I \rangle$, does
$$ \frac{\langle I \rangle}{\delta(\tau)} = I $$
Would $$S_I(\omega)=S_I(0)= \frac{q \langle I \rangle}{2 \pi \delta(\tau)}$$ or $$S_I(\omega)=S_I(0)= \frac{q \langle I \rangle}{\delta(\tau)}$$
is that I know the answer to be
$$ S_I = q I $$
with no average $\langle I \rangle$ or $2\pi$.