1
$\begingroup$

I understand the classical model of light polarization in terms of two complex numbers, known as Jones vector.

In the quantum case, for example, consider photons sent through two polarizers, the first one at an angle $\theta$ with the second one, aligned on the $x$-axis (perpendicular to the $y$-axis).

According to The Feynman Lectures on Physics, vol III, § 11-4, the state vector of a photon passing the first polarizer is $$\cos\theta\ |x\rangle+\sin\theta\ |y\rangle,$$ where $|x\rangle,|y\rangle$ are the state vectors of photons polarized along $x,y$-axes.

Similarly, the state vector of a right polarized photon is $$\cos\theta\ |x\rangle+ \exp(i\ \pi/2)\ \sin\theta\ |y\rangle,\theta=\frac{\pi}{4}$$

Why is it so?

The moduli of coordinates are the square roots of the probabilities of transmission, $\cos^2\theta,\ \sin^2\theta$, set by classical electrodynamics.

But how are the coordinate phase differences ($y$ less $x$, $0$ in the first case, $\pi/2$ in the second case) determined?

They are just taken from the classical case: the quantum state vector is identified with the classical Jones vector.

Can it be justified from symmetries in the 2D Euclidean space $(x,y)$, where the electrical field lies?

Is it a theorem in quantum electrodynamics?

$\endgroup$
9
  • $\begingroup$ It is not clear what the second expression means. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2023 at 4:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please clarify your specific problem or provide additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it's hard to tell exactly what you're asking. $\endgroup$
    – Community Bot
    Commented Apr 10, 2023 at 5:04
  • $\begingroup$ For starters: a polarizer is one of three things: it is either absorbing part of the energy of the field OR it is changing the total angular momentum of the field OR both. I hope that Feynman's book doesn't actually contain a phrase that says that "a photon" has a wave vector. A multi-photon wave function may have a wave vector in the classical limit, but a single photon has only an energy, a momentum and an angular momentum. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2023 at 7:32
  • $\begingroup$ The second expression is equivalent to $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|x\rangle+i\ |y\rangle)$ but shows $\theta$ and the phase $\pi/2$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2023 at 7:45
  • $\begingroup$ In short, the problem is that phases are taken from the classical case to the quantum case without any justification, not even an hypothesis. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 10, 2023 at 7:49

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.