2
$\begingroup$

How can we derive the following formula:

$$\vec{B}(\vec{r})=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\left[ \frac{3(\vec{m}\cdot\vec{r})\vec{r}}{r^5} - \frac{\vec{m}}{r^3}\right]\; ,$$

I want to derive it as a limit of a pair of magnetic charges, as the source shrinks to a point, while keeping the magnetic moment $m$ constant. I know that it can also be derived as the limit of a current loop, but here we have to use the vector potential:

$$\vec{A}(\vec{r}) = \frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\frac{\vec{m} \times \vec{r}}{r^3} \;$$

and to be honest I don't really know what that actually is, and where it comes from. So I would like to derive it using pair of magnetic charges. Thank you!

I tried to find some online sources with this type of derivation, but no luck (urls would be appreciated).

$\endgroup$
3
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Magnetic charges don't exist, as stated by Gauss's law for magnetism. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 18:42
  • $\begingroup$ What's interesting is that the above is only the classical field, it's missing a Dirac delta distribution. If you were to try and derive it using two charges instead of an ideal magnetic dipole with current density $\vec{j} = -\vec{m} \times \nabla \delta$, you would get the distributional term wrong. See Leung, P.T.; Ni, G.J. On the singularities of the electrostatic and magnetostatic dipole Fields. Eur. J. Phys. 2006. $\endgroup$
    – kricheli
    Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 19:02
  • $\begingroup$ Why do you need to derive the magnetic field of a dipole but you have never encountered the vector potential? That seems odd to me. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 11, 2022 at 20:04

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

This is going to be quite formal, but a nice analogy to electrostatics.

The ideal electric dipole

If you take two opposite point charges and at constant (electric) dipole moment $\vec{p}$ reduce their distance to zero you get the charge density $$ \rho = - \vec{p} \cdot \nabla \delta $$ with the delta distribution $\delta$. To compute the field created by this charge distributions we need three ingredients:

  1. Gauß' law $$ \nabla \cdot \vec{D} = \rho\,, $$ which relates the dielectric displacement $\vec{D}$ to the charge density,
  2. Faraday's law (static version here) $$ \nabla \times \vec{E} = 0\,, $$ which yields the fact that the electric field can be described as the gradient of a potential, $\vec{E} = - \nabla \phi$, and
  3. a material law for the vacuum, $$ \vec{D} = \varepsilon_0 \vec{E}\,. $$

Together they yield the Poisson equation $$ -\Delta \phi = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}\,. $$ The operator on the left has the fundamental solution $$ G = \frac{1}{4 \pi r}\,, $$ i.e. $$ - \Delta G = \delta $$ and for a general charge the solution to the Poisson equation is $$ \phi = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0} \rho \ast G $$ where the asterisk denotes the convolution. This way, for example, we get the Coulomb potential for the point charge.

Using the charge distribution of the ideal dipole we get the potential $$ \phi = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0} \vec{p} \cdot \nabla G $$ and the electric field $$ \vec{E} = - \nabla \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0} \vec{p} \cdot \nabla G\,. $$

The ideal magnetic dipole

For the ideal magnetic dipole it's exactly the same, only a little different. ;) Take a current loop of given magnetic dipole moment $\vec{m}$ and reduce its size to zero. The distributional limit will be the current density $$ \vec{j} = - \vec{m} \times \nabla \delta\,. $$ To compute the field created by this current distribution we need three ingredients:

  1. Ampère's law (magnetostatic version) $$ \nabla \times \vec{H} = \vec{j}\,, $$ which relates the magnetic field to the current density,
  2. the equation $$ \nabla \cdot \vec{B} = 0\,, $$ which ensures the existence of a vector potential such that $\vec{B} = \nabla \times \vec{A}$, and
  3. you guessed it, a material law of the vacuum $$ \vec{B} = \mu_0 \vec{H}\,. $$

Together they yield the Poisson equation for the vector potential $$ -\Delta \vec{A} = \mu_0 \vec{j} $$ We already know how to solve it - the vector potential will be the convolution $$ \vec{A} = - \mu_0 \vec{j} \ast G\,. $$ And so, in complete analogy to electrostatics we here find for the magnetic dipole $$ \vec{A} = \mu_0 \vec{m} \times \nabla G\,, $$ and the field of the magnetic dipole is $$ \vec{B} = \nabla \times \left(\mu_0 \vec{m} \times \nabla G\right) \\ = \mu_0 \vec{m} \delta - \mu_0 \nabla \vec{m} \cdot \nabla G \,. $$ Explicitly calculating the derivatives of the fundamental solution now yields what you are interested in. For including the delta terms you might want to look at Frahm, C.P. Some novel delta-function identities. Am. J. Phys. 1983. You don't have to if you just want to get the classical part of the solution...

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.