Timeline for Magnetic field of dipole derivation
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2022 at 14:59 | vote | accept | Edward Henry Brenner | ||
| Jun 11, 2022 at 21:35 | answer | added | kricheli | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 11, 2022 at 20:04 | comment | added | Herr Feinmann | Why do you need to derive the magnetic field of a dipole but you have never encountered the vector potential? That seems odd to me. | |
| S Jun 11, 2022 at 19:42 | history | suggested | Brendan Darrer | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
improved grammar
|
| Jun 11, 2022 at 19:11 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 11, 2022 at 19:42 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2022 at 19:02 | comment | added | kricheli | What's interesting is that the above is only the classical field, it's missing a Dirac delta distribution. If you were to try and derive it using two charges instead of an ideal magnetic dipole with current density $\vec{j} = -\vec{m} \times \nabla \delta$, you would get the distributional term wrong. See Leung, P.T.; Ni, G.J. On the singularities of the electrostatic and magnetostatic dipole Fields. Eur. J. Phys. 2006. | |
| Jun 11, 2022 at 18:42 | comment | added | Thomas Fritsch | Magnetic charges don't exist, as stated by Gauss's law for magnetism. | |
| Jun 11, 2022 at 18:21 | history | asked | Edward Henry Brenner | CC BY-SA 4.0 |