2
$\begingroup$

There seems to be a limit, around 0.33, on the fastest possible aperture of a photographic lens made of glass. Is there a theoretical limit on the minimal focal length of a photographic lens (rectangular projection, not a fisheye)? Are the physical reasons that would prevent a, say, 1 mm focal length lens for a full frame sensor?

I also asked this question on Photography SE, but didn't get quite the answer I was looking for.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Just some thoughts...From the Wikipedia article Lens, we have the Lensmaker's Equation for a single lens:

Lensmaker's Equation

where f is the focal length, n is the material index of refraction, d is the thickness and R1 and R2 are the radii of curvature. Let's for simplicity consider a plano-convex lens, with R2 infinite. The equation then reduces to f = R1/(n-1). So smaller and smaller f can be achieved with smaller and smaller radius of curvature, which implies smaller and smaller aperture since you can't have a big lens with a small radius. There doesn't appear to be any theoretical limit here.

Now if we are talking about a very short focal length photographic lens, it would have to be positioned very close to the sensor in order to achieve focus, which I would think would lead to handling and mounting issues.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ That's great for a photographic lens consisting of one element, but most of them (all of them?) consist of multiple elements. $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Commented Jan 7, 2020 at 1:19
  • $\begingroup$ the more elements you add, the larger the resulting lens combination will be, however, the image must be outside of the lens for imaging purpose and therefore a larger lens forces a longer focal length. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 15, 2020 at 2:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.