I understand that in physics, for a converging lens, the focal length is based on the refractive index of the lens material and its curvature. However, I started reading a bunch of photography articles and got to the topic of FOV. All of the articles I have come across provide a similar visual and formula to the one below...
However, this defines focal length as the distance from the lens to the image sensor which would mean it could change. This doesn't make sense to me as I thought the focal length was a property intrinsic to the lens itself. I am looking for clarification as to why there are two different distinctions here and why photography talks about focal length in this manner? The only explanation I could think of is that usually, we are focusing on objects so far past the 2F point that the resulting image location of our desired objects are always located so close to the 1F point that the difference in FOV angle would be negligible (because the distance between lens and sensor would be close to the actual focal length of the lense)?