1
$\begingroup$

Fermionic field operators do obey anticommutation relations, so for a chosen Field operator (and the field momentum), we have: $$ \{\Psi_a, \Psi_b\} = \{\pi_a, \pi_b\}= 0 $$ with the $\Psi_a$ being different field components, and the $\pi_a$ being the respective field momentum. $\{\cdot ,\cdot\}$ denotes the anticommutator.

Since these anticommutation relations imply that $\Psi_a \Psi_a$ is zero, does this mean that any hamiltonian or lagrangian I write down can at most be linear in fields / momenta?

EDIT: To be more clear about what I mean with "Linearity". Let's say the field has two independent components, $\Psi_1$ and $\Psi_2$. I can imagine that there will be terms like $\Psi_1 \Psi_2$, but any term like $\Psi_1 \Psi_2 \Psi_1$ would also be forbidden, because I can swap it into a configuration like "$(-1)^n \Psi_1 \Psi_1 \Psi_2$". Is that right?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$
  • No, if there are more than one Grassmann-variable (which is often the case), the Lagrangian/Hamiltonian can contain non-linear higher-order terms. With $n$ Grassmann-variables, one can build an $n$th-order polyonomial.

  • In field theory (where the number of DOF is infinite), one can in principle construct higher-order terms using spacetime derivatives of the Grassmann-fields.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean for example different components of the fields? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2019 at 12:27
  • $\begingroup$ $\uparrow$ Yes. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 28, 2019 at 12:28
  • $\begingroup$ I made a little edit, to get rid off any eventual misconceptions. If you could account for this in your answer, I will accept it. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2019 at 13:16
  • $\begingroup$ An n-order term in which every of the Grassmann variables appears just one time? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 29, 2019 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ $\uparrow$ Right. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Sep 29, 2019 at 10:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.