Questions tagged [grassmann-numbers]
The grassmann-numbers tag has no usage guidance.
317
questions
1
vote
0
answers
79
views
Wick's theorem proof for fermions
This is my first question. I am trying to prove Wick's theorem for fermions. I am currently using Peskin and Schroeder's discussion, which is in section 4.7 (and uses section 4.3, where Wick's ...
0
votes
0
answers
37
views
Should Faddeev-Popov ghosts (in path integral) belong to infinite-dimensional Grassmann (Banach) algebra?
Many years ago, I had the opportunity to study gauge theories based on the book by Faddeev and Slavnov. The Faddeev-Popov ghost fields in the path integral for the Yang-Mills (YM) theory did not ...
0
votes
1
answer
79
views
$2\pi$-rotation of fermionic states vs. fermionic operators
Given a fermionic state $|\Psi\rangle$, a $2\pi$ rotation should transform it as
\begin{equation}
|\Psi\rangle \quad\to\quad -|\Psi\rangle \,,
\end{equation}
On the other hand, given a fermionic ...
0
votes
1
answer
53
views
Trace formula for fermionic variables
I am using Bravyi's paper "Lagrangian representation of fermionic linear optics" and one formula that stumbled me is the trace formula in Eq. (15) in the picture below:
I do not see how to ...
2
votes
1
answer
97
views
Commuting/anticommuting properties of fermionic ghost fields in BRST Quantization
I was reading the paper "Batalin-Vilkovisky analysis of supersymmetric systems" (by Laurent Baulieu and others). I am struggling to understand how commutation/anticommutation relations of ...
0
votes
0
answers
17
views
N=4 Supersymmetric Ward identity
(This question pertains to exercise 4.13 of Elvang and Huang's textbook (which used to be lecture notes). This is not for a class, just to learn some new tools for work).
Consider the expansion of the ...
3
votes
1
answer
78
views
Grassmann numbers and fermion creation and annihilation operators
Reading Fradkin's book on Condensed Matter Physics, I encountered Grassmann numbers. In the following $\hat\Psi$ and $\hat\Psi^\dagger$ are the fermion annihilation and creation operators whereas $\...
1
vote
1
answer
49
views
Fermionic propagator [closed]
Given the fermionic generating functional $$Z[\eta]=\
det^{\frac{1}{2}}(K_{ij})e^{-\frac{i}{2}\eta_{i}G^{ij}\eta_{j}},\tag{1}$$ where $$G^{ij}=K^{-1}_{ij}$$ is the Green function of our theory, then ...
3
votes
2
answers
396
views
Proving a Grassmann integral identity
How to prove the following identity
$$
\begin{align}
\int {\rm d} \eta_{1} {\rm d} \bar{\eta}_{1} \exp\left(a \left(\bar{\eta}_{1}-\bar{\eta}_{0}\right)\left(\eta_{1}-\eta_{0}\right) + b \left(\bar{\...
0
votes
0
answers
68
views
Trace formula in Grassmann algebra
From Grassmann algebra, we know the following relation
\begin{equation}
\mathrm{Tr} e^{-a\hat{c}^{\dagger}\hat{c}} =1+e^{-a}
\end{equation}
Now, how to prove the following generalized results?
\begin{...
0
votes
1
answer
48
views
How does this term in the Majorana mass not vanish?
This is classical field theory. In the Majorana mass term, we have the expression
$$\nu_L^T\sigma_2\nu_L \tag{1}$$
where the left-handed spinor field $\nu$ has a Grassmann-valued amplitude, i.e., $\nu ...
2
votes
2
answers
97
views
Grassmann variables and orthogonality of coherent fermionic states
Let a coherent fermionic state
$$
\left|\phi\right> := \left|0\right> + \left|1\right> \phi,\tag{0}
$$
where $\phi$ is a Grassmann number (i.e. it anticommutes with other Grassmann numbers). ...
-1
votes
1
answer
101
views
Confusion about whether a fermion field and its conjugate as an Grassmann number
I'm confused about what "a Grassmann-odd number" really means and how does it apply to fermions.
In some text, it says that "if $\varepsilon \eta+\eta \varepsilon =0 $, then $\...
1
vote
1
answer
61
views
How to tell if a composite boson field should be real or complex?
Let's say I have a system with two species of fermions, $f$ and $c$, where $f$'s are neutral but $c$'s are charged. Each of these has its own $U(1)$ related to particle-number conservation.
Now, if I ...
1
vote
1
answer
68
views
Fierz idendity (supersymmetry)
So basically I have two Fierz identities involving spinors:
$$\psi^a \psi^b = -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{ab} \psi \psi$$
And
$$\overline{\psi}^{\dot{a}} \overline{\psi}^{\dot{b}} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{\...
2
votes
1
answer
100
views
Why reasonable observables are made of an even number of fermion fields?
On Michele Maggiore book on QFT (page 91) is stated, out of nothing, that "observables are made of an even number of fermionic operator" and similar sentences is in Peskin book (page 56).
Is ...
2
votes
0
answers
97
views
What is the action of fermionic Hamiltonian $\mu_1 n_1 + \mu_2 n_2 + U n_1 n_2$
Problem
Consider a Hamiltonian
\begin{equation}
H(c^\dagger, c) = \mu_1 c_1^\dagger c_1 + \mu_2 c_2^\dagger c_2 + U c_1^\dagger c_1 c_2^\dagger c_2\,,
\end{equation}
where $c_i$ are fermionic ...
5
votes
1
answer
462
views
Dirac Lagrangian in Classical Field Theory with Grassmann numbers
The concept of the Grassmann number makes me confused.
It is used to describe fermionic fields, especially path integral quantization.
Also, it is used to deal with the classical field theory of ...
5
votes
0
answers
189
views
How the supercharge operators act on superfields in quantum mechanics, and the adjoints of supercharges?
I'm watching this lecture on introductory Supersymmetry (Clay Cordova, 2019 TASI lecture 2 on Supersymmetry). My question relates to the first 20minutes or so. The lecturer is introducing Superfields ...
1
vote
1
answer
77
views
Total derivative of Grassmann variables
From page 21 of "Conformal Field Theory" by Di Francesco, Mathieu, and Sénéchal, the free Fermion Lagrangian is given by:
$$L=\frac{i}{2}\psi_i T_{ij}\dot{\psi}_j-V(\psi)$$
Where the $\psi$ ...
1
vote
1
answer
80
views
Operator representation in Fermionic Fock space
The representation of any operator $F$ in the fermionic Fock space in terms of displacement operators as -
\begin{equation}
F = \int d^2{\bf{\xi}}~f(\xi) D(-\xi)
\end{equation}
where $f(\xi)$ is the ...
0
votes
1
answer
75
views
Legendre transform involving fermions, sign issues? [duplicate]
Given a Lagrangian, to switch to a Hamiltonian, we do a Legendre transform.
Suppose the Lagrangian has fermions, say a term like $\frac{i}{2}(\bar{\psi} \dot{\psi} - \dot{\bar{\psi}} \psi)$, then I ...
2
votes
1
answer
88
views
Positive definiteness of Dirac hamiltonian?
In David Tong's notes, he says that the Hamiltonian (4.92) is positive definite ( see page 112 of chapter five ). Here is equation (4.92) from chapter four.
$$ E = \int d^3 x \ T^{00} = \int d^3 x \ \...
1
vote
0
answers
47
views
If a Grassmann number can represent a fermionic wave function, how does it represent the w.f. amplitude in space, and maybe time too?
There's a clear account in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmann_number of how Grassmann numbers $z$ can be used to represent fermionic wave functions, constructed from the exterior algebra $Λ(v)$ ...
5
votes
1
answer
323
views
Why are physical states not eigenstates of BRST charge?
In many texts in quantum field theory or string theory, it is stated that the BRST charge $Q$ must annihilate physical states because the states are required to be BRST invariant. Since $Q$ generates ...
1
vote
1
answer
94
views
Path Integral Measure Transformation as $(DetU)^{-1}$
The path integral measure transforms as $D\Psi\rightarrow (DetU)^{-1}D\Psi$ for fermions, with $DetU=J$ the Jacobian.
I am referring to Peskin and Schroeder's Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, ...
1
vote
0
answers
57
views
Literature on Representation Theory of Graded Lie Algebras
I am currently studying 'advanced' representation theory, including topics like super-Lie algebras. I've come across various gradings (excluding the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ grading), such as how to select odd ...
0
votes
0
answers
42
views
Cubic Grassmann term
Consider a Grassmannian action with a cubic interaction as follows
$$L_{int} = -i(\theta_1\theta_2\dot{\theta}_3-\dot{\bar{\theta}}_3\bar{\theta}_2\bar{\theta_1})$$
where $\theta_1, \theta_2, \theta_3$...
2
votes
0
answers
99
views
Are representations of (bosonic) Lie groups over Grassmann variables well understood?
When one studies representations of (bosonic) Lie groups in physics, whether dealing with spacetime symmetries or gauge symmetries, it is often left implicit whether the representations are over real ...
2
votes
1
answer
76
views
Berezin Integration, confirming an measure is invariant
I am working through the Mirror Symmetry book, available here.
I already had a question about an earlier part of the same Exercise 9.2.1 on page 157:
We are given the following action with one boson ...
2
votes
0
answers
89
views
A Question of Pseudo-Classical Mechanics of Grassmann-Odd Variables [duplicate]
I would like to understand the following problem:
You have a classical fermion in one dimension. It has no mass, and no interactions. One can write its action as follows:
$$S=\int_{\mathbb{R}}dtL(\...
0
votes
1
answer
227
views
A Question of Pseudo-Classical Mechanics of Grassmann-Odd Variables
I would like to understand the following problem:
You have a classical fermion in one dimension. It has no mass, and no interactions. One can write its action as follows:
$$S=\int_{\mathbb{R}}dtL(\...
2
votes
1
answer
139
views
Confirming an action is invariant under a supersymmetric transformation
I am studying chapter 9 of the book Mirror Symmetry, available here. My question is relating to page 156/157 where Supersymmetry is being introduced for the first time in QFT in 0-dimensions.
We are ...
2
votes
1
answer
149
views
Schwartz's Quantum field theory (14.100)
I am reading the Schwartz's Quantum field theory, p.269~p.272 ( 14.6 Fermionic path integral ) and some question arises.
In section 14.6, Fermionic path integral, p.272, $(14.100)$, he states that
$$ ...
2
votes
1
answer
128
views
Why does fermion have the expansion with Grassmann-numbers?
I learn the chiral anomaly by Fujikawa method. The text book "Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies, Kazuo Fujikawa", in the page 151, says that
…one can define a complete orthonormal set $\{...
0
votes
0
answers
36
views
Explicit form of Noether current for Majorana equation
I am looking for an explicit form of the Noether current for the Majorana equation.
2
votes
1
answer
162
views
Strange definition of the fermion number operator in Polchinski
In Polchinski's exposition of the RNS formalism for the superstring (String Theory: Volume II, chapter 10), in page 8, he mentions the worldsheet fermion number operator, which he calls $F$. He then ...
1
vote
1
answer
82
views
Fermionic path integral with boundary
Given a path integral:
$$K(\eta,\xi) = \int\limits_{\psi(0)=\eta}^{\psi(1)=\xi} e^{\int_0^1\dot{\psi}(t)\psi(t) dt} D\psi\tag{1}$$
where $\psi(t)$ are a real Grassmann fields.
I get two answers ...
2
votes
0
answers
54
views
Supersymmetry transformation superstring theory [closed]
in the study of worldsheet supersymmetry which im using Becker/Becker/Schwarz we introduce the idea of superspace by introducing a coordinate $\theta^{A}$ in addition to our $\sigma^{\alpha}=(\sigma,\...
1
vote
1
answer
283
views
Fermionic Parity operator or number operator are not conserved after Bogoliubov transformation
I have a number operator $a^\dagger a + b^\dagger b$, where $a^\dagger$ and $b^\dagger$ are fermion operators. If a unitary transformation $U$ is performed, the number operator is written in the new ...
3
votes
1
answer
354
views
Classical fermions, where are they?
Context:
Studying the path integral formulation of QFT I stumbled upon a fairly simple statement: when doing loop expansions of a partition function:
$$Z[\eta ; \bar{\eta}] = \int [d\psi][d\bar{\psi}]...
4
votes
1
answer
170
views
How exactly is spinor with Grassmann variables as component defined?
I'm reading K. Muller's Introduction to Supersymmetry about spinor representation. He said that the components of a spinor are Grassmann variables.
I understood Grassmann variables as follows. For a ...
2
votes
1
answer
224
views
Free fermion OPE
In Di Francesco's Conformal Field Theory, the propagator for the free Majorana fermion theory is given by
$$ \langle{\psi(z) \psi(w)}\rangle = \dfrac{1}{2\pi g} \dfrac{1}{z-w}$$
and the energy-...
5
votes
1
answer
209
views
Weinberg's path integral for fermions in Volume 1
In sec. 9.5 of Weinberg's QFT 1, he introduces operators $Q$ and $P$ satisfying
$$
\{Q,P\}=i \tag{9.5.1}
$$
$$
\{Q,Q\}=\{P,P\}=0 \tag{9.5.2}
$$
and eigenstates $|q\rangle$:
$$
Q|q\rangle =q|q\rangle \...
1
vote
1
answer
116
views
When does the spinor need to be in a Grassmann variable?
Follow the closed question When does the spinor need to be in a grassmann variable?
--
Does the spinor in the spinor representation of the space-time symmetry
Lorentz space-time symmetry, like $so(1,...
1
vote
1
answer
161
views
Calculating a Gaussian-like path integrals with Grassmann variables and real variables
I want to compute the following path integral
$$Z[w] = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}}\int d^n x \: \prod_{i=1}^{n}d\overline{\theta}_id\theta \: \exp{\left(-\overline{\theta}_i \partial_j w_i(x)\theta_j -\...
6
votes
2
answers
329
views
Grassmann parameter in supersymmetry
Let's consider a free Wess-Zumino Lagrangian given by
$$\mathcal{L} = \partial^{\mu}\overline{\phi}\partial_{\mu}\phi + i\psi^{\dagger}\overline{\sigma}^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi\tag{1}$$
Whose ...
2
votes
1
answer
160
views
Bosonic representation of delta function for Grassmann-even quantity
Suppose I have 2 Grassmann scalars $\theta$ and $\bar{\theta}$ and form the bosonic quantity $X = \bar{\theta}\theta$. Is there a purely bosonic representation of the delta function $\delta(X - \...
1
vote
0
answers
68
views
Spin of covariant derivatives in 3D $\mathcal{N}=2$ superspace
Consider the 3D $\mathcal{N}=2$ superspace covariant derivatives $D_\alpha$ and $\bar D_\beta$, which have the following anti-commutation relations
$$\{ D_\alpha, \bar D_\beta \}=-2i \gamma^\mu_{\...
2
votes
1
answer
436
views
What are self-interacting fermions?
There're a bunch of models of fermions with quartic self-interactions. There's an introduction from this wikipedia page.
For example, one can construct the Soler model of self-interacting Dirac ...