Skip to main content
Planned maintenance impacting Stack Overflow and all Stack Exchange sites is scheduled for Monday, September 16, 2024, 5:00 PM-10:00 PM EDT (Monday, September 16, 21:00 UTC- Tuesday, September 17, 2:00 UTC). The email/password authentication method will be unavailable for logging in and registering. Read more here

Questions tagged [grassmann-numbers]

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
79 views

Wick's theorem proof for fermions

This is my first question. I am trying to prove Wick's theorem for fermions. I am currently using Peskin and Schroeder's discussion, which is in section 4.7 (and uses section 4.3, where Wick's ...
Eric García Hemon's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
37 views

Should Faddeev-Popov ghosts (in path integral) belong to infinite-dimensional Grassmann (Banach) algebra?

Many years ago, I had the opportunity to study gauge theories based on the book by Faddeev and Slavnov. The Faddeev-Popov ghost fields in the path integral for the Yang-Mills (YM) theory did not ...
Vladimir's user avatar
  • 101
0 votes
1 answer
79 views

$2\pi$-rotation of fermionic states vs. fermionic operators

Given a fermionic state $|\Psi\rangle$, a $2\pi$ rotation should transform it as \begin{equation} |\Psi\rangle \quad\to\quad -|\Psi\rangle \,, \end{equation} On the other hand, given a fermionic ...
Mateo's user avatar
  • 707
0 votes
1 answer
53 views

Trace formula for fermionic variables

I am using Bravyi's paper "Lagrangian representation of fermionic linear optics" and one formula that stumbled me is the trace formula in Eq. (15) in the picture below: I do not see how to ...
Evangeline A. K. McDowell's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
97 views

Commuting/anticommuting properties of fermionic ghost fields in BRST Quantization

I was reading the paper "Batalin-Vilkovisky analysis of supersymmetric systems" (by Laurent Baulieu and others). I am struggling to understand how commutation/anticommutation relations of ...
Aravind Madhavan's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
17 views

N=4 Supersymmetric Ward identity

(This question pertains to exercise 4.13 of Elvang and Huang's textbook (which used to be lecture notes). This is not for a class, just to learn some new tools for work). Consider the expansion of the ...
MathZilla's user avatar
  • 779
3 votes
1 answer
78 views

Grassmann numbers and fermion creation and annihilation operators

Reading Fradkin's book on Condensed Matter Physics, I encountered Grassmann numbers. In the following $\hat\Psi$ and $\hat\Psi^\dagger$ are the fermion annihilation and creation operators whereas $\...
R Walser's user avatar
  • 145
1 vote
1 answer
49 views

Fermionic propagator [closed]

Given the fermionic generating functional $$Z[\eta]=\ det^{\frac{1}{2}}(K_{ij})e^{-\frac{i}{2}\eta_{i}G^{ij}\eta_{j}},\tag{1}$$ where $$G^{ij}=K^{-1}_{ij}$$ is the Green function of our theory, then ...
Michael 's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
396 views

Proving a Grassmann integral identity

How to prove the following identity $$ \begin{align} \int {\rm d} \eta_{1} {\rm d} \bar{\eta}_{1} \exp\left(a \left(\bar{\eta}_{1}-\bar{\eta}_{0}\right)\left(\eta_{1}-\eta_{0}\right) + b \left(\bar{\...
Faber Bosch's user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
68 views

Trace formula in Grassmann algebra

From Grassmann algebra, we know the following relation \begin{equation} \mathrm{Tr} e^{-a\hat{c}^{\dagger}\hat{c}} =1+e^{-a} \end{equation} Now, how to prove the following generalized results? \begin{...
Santanu Singh's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
48 views

How does this term in the Majorana mass not vanish?

This is classical field theory. In the Majorana mass term, we have the expression $$\nu_L^T\sigma_2\nu_L \tag{1}$$ where the left-handed spinor field $\nu$ has a Grassmann-valued amplitude, i.e., $\nu ...
Silly Goose's user avatar
  • 2,772
2 votes
2 answers
97 views

Grassmann variables and orthogonality of coherent fermionic states

Let a coherent fermionic state $$ \left|\phi\right> := \left|0\right> + \left|1\right> \phi,\tag{0} $$ where $\phi$ is a Grassmann number (i.e. it anticommutes with other Grassmann numbers). ...
Gabriel Ybarra Marcaida's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
101 views

Confusion about whether a fermion field and its conjugate as an Grassmann number

I'm confused about what "a Grassmann-odd number" really means and how does it apply to fermions. In some text, it says that "if $\varepsilon \eta+\eta \varepsilon =0 $, then $\...
Errorbar's user avatar
  • 368
1 vote
1 answer
61 views

How to tell if a composite boson field should be real or complex?

Let's say I have a system with two species of fermions, $f$ and $c$, where $f$'s are neutral but $c$'s are charged. Each of these has its own $U(1)$ related to particle-number conservation. Now, if I ...
dumbpotato's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
68 views

Fierz idendity (supersymmetry)

So basically I have two Fierz identities involving spinors: $$\psi^a \psi^b = -\frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{ab} \psi \psi$$ And $$\overline{\psi}^{\dot{a}} \overline{\psi}^{\dot{b}} = \frac{1}{2} \epsilon^{\...
LSS's user avatar
  • 980
2 votes
1 answer
100 views

Why reasonable observables are made of an even number of fermion fields?

On Michele Maggiore book on QFT (page 91) is stated, out of nothing, that "observables are made of an even number of fermionic operator" and similar sentences is in Peskin book (page 56). Is ...
Andrea's user avatar
  • 625
2 votes
0 answers
97 views

What is the action of fermionic Hamiltonian $\mu_1 n_1 + \mu_2 n_2 + U n_1 n_2$

Problem Consider a Hamiltonian \begin{equation} H(c^\dagger, c) = \mu_1 c_1^\dagger c_1 + \mu_2 c_2^\dagger c_2 + U c_1^\dagger c_1 c_2^\dagger c_2\,, \end{equation} where $c_i$ are fermionic ...
Michał Jan's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
462 views

Dirac Lagrangian in Classical Field Theory with Grassmann numbers

The concept of the Grassmann number makes me confused. It is used to describe fermionic fields, especially path integral quantization. Also, it is used to deal with the classical field theory of ...
Jaeok Yi's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
189 views

How the supercharge operators act on superfields in quantum mechanics, and the adjoints of supercharges?

I'm watching this lecture on introductory Supersymmetry (Clay Cordova, 2019 TASI lecture 2 on Supersymmetry). My question relates to the first 20minutes or so. The lecturer is introducing Superfields ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
1 vote
1 answer
77 views

Total derivative of Grassmann variables

From page 21 of "Conformal Field Theory" by Di Francesco, Mathieu, and Sénéchal, the free Fermion Lagrangian is given by: $$L=\frac{i}{2}\psi_i T_{ij}\dot{\psi}_j-V(\psi)$$ Where the $\psi$ ...
QPhysl's user avatar
  • 147
1 vote
1 answer
80 views

Operator representation in Fermionic Fock space

The representation of any operator $F$ in the fermionic Fock space in terms of displacement operators as - \begin{equation} F = \int d^2{\bf{\xi}}~f(\xi) D(-\xi) \end{equation} where $f(\xi)$ is the ...
Santanu Singh's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
75 views

Legendre transform involving fermions, sign issues? [duplicate]

Given a Lagrangian, to switch to a Hamiltonian, we do a Legendre transform. Suppose the Lagrangian has fermions, say a term like $\frac{i}{2}(\bar{\psi} \dot{\psi} - \dot{\bar{\psi}} \psi)$, then I ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
2 votes
1 answer
88 views

Positive definiteness of Dirac hamiltonian?

In David Tong's notes, he says that the Hamiltonian (4.92) is positive definite ( see page 112 of chapter five ). Here is equation (4.92) from chapter four. $$ E = \int d^3 x \ T^{00} = \int d^3 x \ \...
baba26's user avatar
  • 523
1 vote
0 answers
47 views

If a Grassmann number can represent a fermionic wave function, how does it represent the w.f. amplitude in space, and maybe time too?

There's a clear account in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grassmann_number of how Grassmann numbers $z$ can be used to represent fermionic wave functions, constructed from the exterior algebra $Λ(v)$ ...
iSeeker's user avatar
  • 1,097
5 votes
1 answer
323 views

Why are physical states not eigenstates of BRST charge?

In many texts in quantum field theory or string theory, it is stated that the BRST charge $Q$ must annihilate physical states because the states are required to be BRST invariant. Since $Q$ generates ...
Chang Hexiang's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
94 views

Path Integral Measure Transformation as $(DetU)^{-1}$

The path integral measure transforms as $D\Psi\rightarrow (DetU)^{-1}D\Psi$ for fermions, with $DetU=J$ the Jacobian. I am referring to Peskin and Schroeder's Introduction to Quantum Field Theory, ...
Archie C's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
57 views

Literature on Representation Theory of Graded Lie Algebras

I am currently studying 'advanced' representation theory, including topics like super-Lie algebras. I've come across various gradings (excluding the $\mathbb{Z}_2$ grading), such as how to select odd ...
0 votes
0 answers
42 views

Cubic Grassmann term

Consider a Grassmannian action with a cubic interaction as follows $$L_{int} = -i(\theta_1\theta_2\dot{\theta}_3-\dot{\bar{\theta}}_3\bar{\theta}_2\bar{\theta_1})$$ where $\theta_1, \theta_2, \theta_3$...
Dr. user44690's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
99 views

Are representations of (bosonic) Lie groups over Grassmann variables well understood?

When one studies representations of (bosonic) Lie groups in physics, whether dealing with spacetime symmetries or gauge symmetries, it is often left implicit whether the representations are over real ...
Craig's user avatar
  • 1,133
2 votes
1 answer
76 views

Berezin Integration, confirming an measure is invariant

I am working through the Mirror Symmetry book, available here. I already had a question about an earlier part of the same Exercise 9.2.1 on page 157: We are given the following action with one boson ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
2 votes
0 answers
89 views

A Question of Pseudo-Classical Mechanics of Grassmann-Odd Variables [duplicate]

I would like to understand the following problem: You have a classical fermion in one dimension. It has no mass, and no interactions. One can write its action as follows: $$S=\int_{\mathbb{R}}dtL(\...
Valac's user avatar
  • 2,943
0 votes
1 answer
227 views

A Question of Pseudo-Classical Mechanics of Grassmann-Odd Variables

I would like to understand the following problem: You have a classical fermion in one dimension. It has no mass, and no interactions. One can write its action as follows: $$S=\int_{\mathbb{R}}dtL(\...
Valac's user avatar
  • 2,943
2 votes
1 answer
139 views

Confirming an action is invariant under a supersymmetric transformation

I am studying chapter 9 of the book Mirror Symmetry, available here. My question is relating to page 156/157 where Supersymmetry is being introduced for the first time in QFT in 0-dimensions. We are ...
Gleeson's user avatar
  • 213
2 votes
1 answer
149 views

Schwartz's Quantum field theory (14.100)

I am reading the Schwartz's Quantum field theory, p.269~p.272 ( 14.6 Fermionic path integral ) and some question arises. In section 14.6, Fermionic path integral, p.272, $(14.100)$, he states that $$ ...
Plantation's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
128 views

Why does fermion have the expansion with Grassmann-numbers?

I learn the chiral anomaly by Fujikawa method. The text book "Path Integrals and Quantum Anomalies, Kazuo Fujikawa", in the page 151, says that …one can define a complete orthonormal set $\{...
s.h's user avatar
  • 129
0 votes
0 answers
36 views

Explicit form of Noether current for Majorana equation

I am looking for an explicit form of the Noether current for the Majorana equation.
MKO's user avatar
  • 2,271
2 votes
1 answer
162 views

Strange definition of the fermion number operator in Polchinski

In Polchinski's exposition of the RNS formalism for the superstring (String Theory: Volume II, chapter 10), in page 8, he mentions the worldsheet fermion number operator, which he calls $F$. He then ...
Bairrao's user avatar
  • 917
1 vote
1 answer
82 views

Fermionic path integral with boundary

Given a path integral: $$K(\eta,\xi) = \int\limits_{\psi(0)=\eta}^{\psi(1)=\xi} e^{\int_0^1\dot{\psi}(t)\psi(t) dt} D\psi\tag{1}$$ where $\psi(t)$ are a real Grassmann fields. I get two answers ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
54 views

Supersymmetry transformation superstring theory [closed]

in the study of worldsheet supersymmetry which im using Becker/Becker/Schwarz we introduce the idea of superspace by introducing a coordinate $\theta^{A}$ in addition to our $\sigma^{\alpha}=(\sigma,\...
Spooooonnnzzz's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
283 views

Fermionic Parity operator or number operator are not conserved after Bogoliubov transformation

I have a number operator $a^\dagger a + b^\dagger b$, where $a^\dagger$ and $b^\dagger$ are fermion operators. If a unitary transformation $U$ is performed, the number operator is written in the new ...
lsdragon's user avatar
  • 337
3 votes
1 answer
354 views

Classical fermions, where are they?

Context: Studying the path integral formulation of QFT I stumbled upon a fairly simple statement: when doing loop expansions of a partition function: $$Z[\eta ; \bar{\eta}] = \int [d\psi][d\bar{\psi}]...
LolloBoldo's user avatar
  • 1,809
4 votes
1 answer
170 views

How exactly is spinor with Grassmann variables as component defined?

I'm reading K. Muller's Introduction to Supersymmetry about spinor representation. He said that the components of a spinor are Grassmann variables. I understood Grassmann variables as follows. For a ...
ycZang's user avatar
  • 41
2 votes
1 answer
224 views

Free fermion OPE

In Di Francesco's Conformal Field Theory, the propagator for the free Majorana fermion theory is given by $$ \langle{\psi(z) \psi(w)}\rangle = \dfrac{1}{2\pi g} \dfrac{1}{z-w}$$ and the energy-...
phenolphthalein's user avatar
5 votes
1 answer
209 views

Weinberg's path integral for fermions in Volume 1

In sec. 9.5 of Weinberg's QFT 1, he introduces operators $Q$ and $P$ satisfying $$ \{Q,P\}=i \tag{9.5.1} $$ $$ \{Q,Q\}=\{P,P\}=0 \tag{9.5.2} $$ and eigenstates $|q\rangle$: $$ Q|q\rangle =q|q\rangle \...
dennis's user avatar
  • 742
1 vote
1 answer
116 views

When does the spinor need to be in a Grassmann variable?

Follow the closed question When does the spinor need to be in a grassmann variable? -- Does the spinor in the spinor representation of the space-time symmetry Lorentz space-time symmetry, like $so(1,...
Марина Marina S's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
161 views

Calculating a Gaussian-like path integrals with Grassmann variables and real variables

I want to compute the following path integral $$Z[w] = \frac{1}{(2\pi)^{n/2}}\int d^n x \: \prod_{i=1}^{n}d\overline{\theta}_id\theta \: \exp{\left(-\overline{\theta}_i \partial_j w_i(x)\theta_j -\...
Geigercounter's user avatar
6 votes
2 answers
329 views

Grassmann parameter in supersymmetry

Let's consider a free Wess-Zumino Lagrangian given by $$\mathcal{L} = \partial^{\mu}\overline{\phi}\partial_{\mu}\phi + i\psi^{\dagger}\overline{\sigma}^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi\tag{1}$$ Whose ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
160 views

Bosonic representation of delta function for Grassmann-even quantity

Suppose I have 2 Grassmann scalars $\theta$ and $\bar{\theta}$ and form the bosonic quantity $X = \bar{\theta}\theta$. Is there a purely bosonic representation of the delta function $\delta(X - \...
eric's user avatar
  • 300
1 vote
0 answers
68 views

Spin of covariant derivatives in 3D $\mathcal{N}=2$ superspace

Consider the 3D $\mathcal{N}=2$ superspace covariant derivatives $D_\alpha$ and $\bar D_\beta$, which have the following anti-commutation relations $$\{ D_\alpha, \bar D_\beta \}=-2i \gamma^\mu_{\...
TaeNyFan's user avatar
  • 4,256
2 votes
1 answer
436 views

What are self-interacting fermions?

There're a bunch of models of fermions with quartic self-interactions. There's an introduction from this wikipedia page. For example, one can construct the Soler model of self-interacting Dirac ...
Valac's user avatar
  • 2,943

1
2 3 4 5
7