My question is based on Qmechanic's answer here which proves that $O^+(m, 1)$ forms a group -- that if two Lorentz transformations have positive time-time co-ordinate, so does their product. The key is that with the Lorentz transformation written in the form:

$$\Lambda = \left[\begin{array}{cc}\Lambda_a & \Lambda_b^t \cr \Lambda_c &\Lambda_R \end{array} \right].$$

We can show that $|(\Lambda\tilde{\Lambda})_a-\Lambda_a\tilde{\Lambda}_a|\le \sqrt{(\Lambda_a^2-1)(\tilde{\Lambda}_a^2-1)}$ which implies that positive $\Lambda_a,\tilde{\Lambda_a}$ imply positive $(\Lambda\tilde{\Lambda})_a$.

Well, the trouble is that this uses the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality in Step 6, and therefore doesn't work for the general case of $O^+(m, n)$. How would one generalise the proof to prove the orthochronous indefinite orthogonal group $O^+(m, n)$ is a group?

Here's what I've tried so far: defining $O^{+}(m,n)$ as the subset of $O(m,n)$ with elements $\Lambda$ which satisfy $\det(\Lambda_a)>0$ (and in fact $\ge 1$),

  1. As before, $(\Lambda\tilde{\Lambda})_a=\Lambda_a\tilde{\Lambda}_a+\Lambda_b^T\tilde{\Lambda}_c$.

  2. From multiplying out $\Lambda^T\eta \Lambda=\eta$ and $\Lambda\eta \Lambda^T=\eta$, we see that $\Lambda_a^2-\Lambda_c^T\Lambda_c=\Lambda_a^2-\Lambda_b^T\Lambda_b=I$ and analogous for $\tilde{\Lambda}$.

  3. So $\det\left((\Lambda\tilde{\Lambda})_a-\Lambda_a\tilde{\Lambda}_a\right)=\det\left(\Lambda_b^T\tilde{\Lambda}_c^T\right)=\sqrt{\det\left(\Lambda_a^2-I\right)\det\left(\tilde{\Lambda}_a^2-I\right)}$.

Well, I'm not sure how to proceed at this point. Does $\det(X-PQ)=\det((P^2-I)(Q^2-I))^{1/2}$ imply that $\det P\ge 1\land\det Q\ge 1\Rightarrow \det X>0$ in general?

The "topological proof" from Ron Maimon does not work either, as the orbit of the unit time vector is connected when $n>1$. I suspect that a more powerful technique than looking at the orbit of the unit time vector would be to look at the topology of the Lie group itself -- but I'm not that familiar with this stuff.

  • $\begingroup$ What is the definition of “orthochronous” when there are multiple temporal dimensions? $\endgroup$ – G. Smith Jul 30 '19 at 2:20
  • $\begingroup$ @G.Smith $\det(\Lambda_a)>0$ (and in fact $\ge 1$). $\endgroup$ – Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir Jul 30 '19 at 5:17
  1. Let us repeat that the orthochronous indefinite orthogonal group is defined as $$ O^+(p,q;\mathbb{R})~:=~\left\{\begin{bmatrix} a & b \cr c& d\end{bmatrix}\in O(p,q;\mathbb{R})\mid \det(a)>0\right\}.\tag{1}$$ OP wants to check that this is indeed a subgroup. i.e. that it is closed/stabile under under the multiplication & inversion maps.

  2. OP is right: A generalization of the algebraic proof in my Phys.SE answer here does not seem feasible. Instead let us (as OP already suggested) use the non-trivial$^1$ topological fact that the indefinite orthogonal group $$O(p,q;\mathbb{R})~=~\sqcup_{\tau,\sigma \in \mathbb{Z}_2} C_{\tau\sigma}, \qquad n~:= p+q, \qquad p,q ~\geq ~1,\tag{2} $$ has 4 connected components $$ \begin{align}C_{\tau\sigma} &~=~P_{\tau\sigma} \cdot SO^+(p,q;\mathbb{R}) \cr &~=~\left\{\begin{bmatrix} a & b \cr c& d\end{bmatrix}\in O(p,q;\mathbb{R})\mid {\rm sgn}\det(a)=\tau ~\wedge~{\rm sgn}\det(d)=\sigma \right\},\end{align}\tag{3} $$ which are labelled by $2\times 2=4$ elements $$ P_{\tau\sigma}~=~{\rm diag}(\tau,\underbrace{1, \ldots, 1}_{n-2\text{ elements}},\sigma) ~=~\begin{bmatrix} \tau && \cr &\mathbb{1}_{(n-2)\times(n-2)} & \cr && \sigma \end{bmatrix}_{n \times n}, $$ $$\qquad \tau,\sigma ~\in~\mathbb{Z}_2~:=~\{\pm 1\}, \tag{4}$$ of the Klein 4-group $\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2$.

  3. We are here using the non-trivial$^2$ fact that the restricted indefinite orthogonal group $SO^+(p,q;\mathbb{R})$ is path-connected, i.e. any restricted element can be continuously connected to the identity element $\mathbb{1}_{n\times n}$. Since multiplication (and taking inverses) are continuous operations, there must be a group homomorphism $$O(p,q;\mathbb{R})\qquad \stackrel{\Phi}{\longrightarrow}\qquad \mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2.\tag{5}$$ In other words, the multiplication table of connected components is dictated by the Klein 4-group.

  4. We conclude that the orthochronous indefinite orthogonal group $$ O^+(p,q;\mathbb{R})~=~C_{++}\sqcup C_{+-} \tag{6}$$ corresponds to the subgroup $\{1\}\times \mathbb{Z}_2$ of the Klein 4-group, and is hence itself a subgroup. This answers OP's title question. $\Box$


$^1$ The fact that it has at least 4 connected components is trivial, since $$a^ta-\mathbb{1}_{p\times p}~=~c^tc~\geq~ 0\qquad\text{and}\qquad d^td-\mathbb{1}_{q\times q}~=~b^tb~\geq~ 0\tag{7}$$ are semi-positive matrices, so that $$|\det(a)|\geq 1\qquad\text{and}\qquad|\det(d)|\geq 1.\tag{8}$$

$^2$ Note for starters that the exponential map $\exp: so(p,q;\mathbb{R})\to SO^+(p,q;\mathbb{R})$ is not surjective if $p,q\geq 2$, cf. e.g. this Math.SE post.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.