I pasted the whole fragment from the book "Teaching Physics by Laurance Viennot". I generally understand this fragment. However, I am not sure if I understand what author means by the phase at each of those points then has to be readjusted in order for a geometrical optical treatment to be applied to that "object". I circled that fragment with blue. Can you give me more guidance how to understand that?
$\begingroup$
$\endgroup$
3
-
$\begingroup$ As I understand the authors argument, if we consider the object plane as being in-phase, the former assumption of starting in-phase everywhere at the source can‘t hold: „rays“ have paths of different length. // This perspective may be useful when looking at the overall journey of said book, which I can‘t check. $\endgroup$– MS-SPOCommented May 13, 2023 at 6:32
-
1$\begingroup$ @MS-SPO You can borrow the book for an hour by signing in to archive.org. Bottom of page 149. $\endgroup$– FarcherCommented May 13, 2023 at 7:07
-
$\begingroup$ see : physics.stackexchange.com/questions/665164/… and physics.stackexchange.com/questions/200145/… $\endgroup$– hyportnexCommented May 13, 2023 at 13:32
Add a comment
|