It's an established fact that:
Convex lenses produce inverted images of objects beyond the focus, on the other side of the lens.
Any object placed at a finite distance from a concave lens appears to be somewhere between the focus and the optical centre when viewed from the other side.
Both these facts come from the lens formula, $$\frac{1}{f}=\frac{1}{v}-\frac{1}{u}$$
But I wonder:
why a person wearing convex lenses doesn't see inverted images of objects beyond the focus, and
why a person wearing concave lenses doesn't feel that the furthest objects are at a distance of $f$ from their eyes.
Hope my question is clear.
An example
Consider a person wearing spectacles with concave lenses of power $-1$ $\mathbf{D}$. The focal length would be $-1$ $\mathrm{m}$. If an object is at an object-distance $u=-3$ $\mathrm{m}$, simple calculations show that the image would be at an image-distance $v=-0.75$ $\mathrm{m}$ away.
But obviously the object doesn't appear to be so close to the person wearing the spectacles.
More confusingly still, the image would be magnified by a factor of $0.25$, and hence would appear to be rather small.
But again, as anyone wearing concave lenses would tell you, that isn't what they see!
Why is this so?