Why does the Sun appear larger during sunrise and sunset compared to its size during midday even though its distance from the Earth remains fixed all the day? It is only during the Winter when the Sun is away from the Earth and that too is due to the motion of Earth around the Sun, not due to the diurnal motion of the Earth. So is it some optical effect? If yes, what is it really? I apologize if the question has already been asked.
-
1$\begingroup$ Related: physics.stackexchange.com/q/43023/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/20844/2451 and links therein. $\endgroup$– Qmechanic ♦Commented Jul 21, 2017 at 19:16
-
$\begingroup$ If you are in the northern hemisphere, e.g. India, then the Sun is actually closer in the winter. Our distance from the Sun is not the dominant factor in the seasons. If it was then the whole world would have winter at the same time. See en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perihelion_and_aphelion $\endgroup$– badjohnCommented Jul 22, 2017 at 5:59
-
1$\begingroup$ I think this is basically a duplicate of physics.stackexchange.com/q/20844 $\endgroup$– valerioCommented Jul 22, 2017 at 12:22
-
$\begingroup$ have a read en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_illusion $\endgroup$– anna vCommented Jan 3, 2018 at 7:16
3 Answers
The previous answer is not wrong per se, but it only explains a distortion of bodies on the celestial sphere, not the effect you are describing. Edited: Refraction does not reduce the size of objects on the horizon, but it is not the reason for the perceived size.
What you are referring to is often called the Moon Illusion and there are multiple perceptive effects at play. What is important to understand is that our brain is only capable of deducing distance, that is, perceiving three dimensions, up two a certain and very limited range. So everything that happens on the celestial sphere has no depth for us at all: The brain does not have any information about celestial distances at all, and has to fill in the blanks. There are some really interesting phenomena resulting from this.
So the most plausible explanations are:
Apparent Distance: When viewing clouds at shallow angles on the sky, they appear noticeably smaller, compared to when viewed directly above, because they are, of course, farther away. The real, measurable, angular size is smaller. The moon or the sun on the other hand do not appear noticeably smaller, because their real distance does not change much when they move to the horizon. But the brain would expect them to be smaller, much as the clouds, or a plane, and hence perceives them as larger than they 'should be'.
Relative Size: Since the Sun is surrounded by nothing but sky when above, there is nothing to compare it to. When viewed at the horizon, there is actually things to compare the size with, which are all smaller, and hence the brain corrects for this.
I spent over 30 years at sea, and I can tell you that when you're out in the middle of the ocean the setting and rising sun sometimes seems to be much larger. Atmospheric conditions seem to influence this. If you wake up to a red sky and the sun looks huge on the horizon you can expect some nasty weather.
I think that the water vapor in the atmosphere, coupled with the oblique angle of the radiation from the rising sun, magnifies the apparent size.
-
$\begingroup$ That's very interesting. Isn't there someone that has calculated that? I wouldn't know where to start, honestly. But to your point, wouldn't the effect be highly variant, depending on the actual location of moist air pockets (distance, size, actual humidity and so on)? Also, there is actual calculations concerning the oblique angle, and what you get is really a deformation. $\endgroup$– lthzCommented Aug 25, 2017 at 9:30
-
$\begingroup$ Just one addition: I think it may also be plausible that due to the sun rising, the atmospheric scattering does not disperse as much light, so that the sun's corona is highly contrasted against everything. What you may get then, is something like an overexposed photography, where light sources shining directly into the lens appear much bigger. That would be a combination between refractive effects and the workings of our optical nerve system. $\endgroup$– lthzCommented Aug 25, 2017 at 9:36
Yesterday we had a super moon full moon. At moonrise I held a transparent ruler at arm's length and measured the size of the moon against the ruler. It was 7.5 mm. At 11 pm I held the same ruler at arm's length against the moon which was now high in the sky. It was only 4 mm. This is not imaginary. It is real and observable. The larger size is caused by a refraction of light when the moon is at the horizon because the light has to pass through greater amounts of atmosphere to reach you compared to when it is overhead. The same is true of the setting sun. In fact, I recall reading years ago (I believe in my daughter's physics book) that we are actually seeing below the horizon at sunset because of light is being bent by the atmosphere. This phenomenon is worldwide. It is not imaginary. As far as I know it is sound science.
-
$\begingroup$ I think the reason is not the thicker air, but the form of the border. This makes it working more like a lens. $\endgroup$– peterhCommented Jan 3, 2018 at 5:54