3
$\begingroup$

I was reading about the definition of R-parity on this paper http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356 (pg. 53 54). The author says that postulating B and L numbers conservation in the MSSM is sub-optimal as

  1. In the SM their conservation is not postulated but arises from the absence of any renormalisable term in the Lagrangian associated to their violation
  2. B and L violation can occur in small amounts due to the presence of non-perturbative electroweak effects anyway

About reason 2, the author references a paper by t'Hooft which, unfortunately, I cannot download. My question is: what are these non-perturbative effects?

I have seen that there are other questions and answers here related to this topic but I was looking for some less technical, general, or even qualitative answer.

Thank you!

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ 't Hooft's publication list includes this link to a paper on baryon and lepton number nonconservation in $V-A$ gauge theories with charm; is that the one? $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Jan 14, 2016 at 0:50

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

The baryon non-conservation in the quantum theory is caused by the chiral anomaly, which leads to the baryon current $j_B^\mu = \sum_i \bar q_i \gamma^\mu q_i$ being not conserved as $$ \partial_\mu j_B^\mu \propto F\wedge F$$ where $F$ is the field strength tensor of the electroweak field. Now, $\int \partial_\mu j_B^\mu \propto \int F\wedge F$ is a topological invariant, associated to the instanton (see also) sector we're in. The instanton is essentially the classical solution - the vacuum - we're basing our quantum field theoretic perturbative expansion around (see also this and this post of mine). This means instantons are invisible from the perturbative viewpoint - you have to fix one to do perturbation theory.

Furthermore, if one expands the partition function as a Taylor series around vanishing coupling constant, which essentially defines the perturbative approach, the instanton contributions vanish because they are suppressed with a factor $\mathrm{e}^{-1/g}$ whose Taylor expansion at vanishing coupling is identically zero, and hence doesn't appear in the perturbation series (cf. nLab).

Graphically, the anomaly and hence the non-conservation is associated to the triangle diagrams enter image description here

see "Lectures on Anomalies" by Bilal.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.