Questions tagged [non-perturbative]
Use this for questions which discuss models of quantum theories which do not make use of peturbation theory.
1
vote
0answers
24 views
Implications of Instanton Corrections (to Degenerate Vacuua) for Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking
We consider that if the classical vacuua of a theory are degenerate then each of them can be non-invariant under one or more of the symmetries of the Lagrangian. We can choose one of the vacuua and ...
1
vote
0answers
20 views
Perturbative series in physics: why are coeffcieints of Gevrey-1 type (i.e. bounded by $\alpha C^n(n!)^1$
I have only been able to find this explicitly mentioned in this paper on resurgence techniques in physics. And have chased up the hints it gives, but they are not very explanatory.
Essentially, the ...
0
votes
0answers
29 views
What is the difference between real and complex instantons (mathemtically, and their physical significance), and connection to Wick rotation
I am struggling to understand the difference and physical significance between real and complex instantons- I think these are also sometimes called ghost instantons? There are also anti-instantons. ...
6
votes
0answers
113 views
Kallen-Lehmann representation and branch cuts at threshold masses
Let us consider the Kallen-Lehmann representation for the two-point function of scalar fields
$$
\langle \Omega | T\left\{\phi(x) \phi(y)\right\}|\Omega\rangle = \int \frac{d^4 p}{(2\pi)^4} e^{ip\...
1
vote
0answers
57 views
Occurances of integrals of the form $Z(\lambda) = \int g(x)e^{-\frac{f(x)}{\lambda}}dx$ (and perturbation techniques) [closed]
I am writing a review on perturbation techniques (actually hyperasymptotic techniques) for integrals of the form
$$Z(\lambda) = \int g(x)e^{-\frac{f(x)}{\lambda}}dx,$$
where the interest is in the ...
1
vote
0answers
48 views
Nonperturbative results for $\phi^3$ theory in dimensions $d>6$?
The theory is nonrenormalizeable in those dimensions, but can you say anything about the theory anyway?
Specifically I am wondering about the status of whether the theory is trivial, i.e. a ...
2
votes
1answer
67 views
Non-renormalizeable Interaction Implies Trivial Interaction?
It has been rigorously proved that the $\phi^4$ theory is trivial, i.e. is a generalized free field, in spacetime dimensions $d>4$. It is also the case that this theory is non-renormalizeable in ...
4
votes
1answer
80 views
Nonrelativistic Quantum Mechanics Results Implying Analogous QFT Results?
One particularly fascinating example of this I have found is the following. The delta function potential has no effect in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics in spatial dimensions greater than or equal ...
3
votes
2answers
129 views
Triviality of Yang Mills in $d>4$?
It has been proved that the $\phi^4$ theory is trivial in spacetime dimensions $d>4$. By trivial I mean that the field $\phi$ is a generalized free field, or in other words, it's only nonzero ...
3
votes
0answers
35 views
What would a non-perturbative renormalization group treatment for polymers look like?
I know that one can do perturbative renormalization for the polymer excluded volume problem or the self-avoiding walk problem corresponding to n=0 component field theory. Here in Hamiltonian, we have, ...
2
votes
1answer
212 views
Why is lattice QCD called non-perturbative?
Like, if you are approximating a smooth structure with a discrete lattice, isn't this like a perturbation from smooth space-time?
If Feynman diagrams are a perturbative method, why are Feynamn ...
0
votes
0answers
56 views
How does Atiyah-Singer index theorem relates instanton number to number of fermion zero modes?
I was studying this paper, where the authors consider an $SU(2)$ gauge field of instanton number 1 on a 4-sphere $M =S^4$. If $n_L$ is the number of zero modes of $\psi_L$ and $n_R$ is the number of ...
4
votes
3answers
248 views
What is meant by “non-perturbative” string theory?
I often hear people talk about finding a non-perturbative formulation of string theory.
What does this mean exactly? To my knowledge string theory is a perturbative method. Just like Feynman graphs ...
1
vote
1answer
60 views
S Duality and Effective Couplings
I am brand new to this subject, so this will probably be a very stupid question, but I would appreciate any patient explanations.
S-duality is typically described as a relationship between two QFTs (...
22
votes
2answers
416 views
Can we get full non-perturbative information of interacting system by computing perturbation to all order?
As we know perturbative expansion of interacting QFT or QM is not a convergent series but an asymptotic series which generally is divergent. So we can't get arbitrary precision of an interacting ...
4
votes
1answer
109 views
Is there any proof that any result from perturbation theory is necessary an asymptotic series?
I know that almost all the series coming from perturbation theory are divergent, such as those from eigenvalue problems or the S-matrix in quantum field theory. The lore is that the series are ...
4
votes
0answers
110 views
What is the problem of non-pertubative quantisation?
In reading books about quantisation, there is (sometimes hidden) the claim, that quantisation is done using a pertubative approach. You look at the free field, find that it is essentially a sum of ...
5
votes
1answer
244 views
What's the difference between a gauge theory with group $G$ and one with its universal cover?
Consider a gauge theory with gauge group $G$, which is not simply connected. What is the difference between this theory, and one with gauge group $\tilde G$, the universal cover of $G$?
Sharing the ...
4
votes
1answer
152 views
How to path-integrate over the half-line?
Consider the path-integral over a scalar field $\varphi$:
$$
Z=\int_{\mathcal S}\ \mathrm e^{iS[\varphi]}\mathrm d\varphi
$$
where $\mathcal S$ is some function space (say, Schwartz or its dual).
How ...
14
votes
1answer
418 views
Why do we care about old-style, counterterm renormalizability?
There are a few different definitions of renormalizability that are standard in quantum field theory textbooks. They're all called the same thing, but I'll make up names to make the distinctions clear....
1
vote
1answer
265 views
How does 11D Supergravity relate to M-Theory?
I know Type IIA/B, Type I, HO, & HE are related through the T and S Dualities. However, how does SUGRA factor in here? What exactly is 11D SUGRA’s significance in M-Theory?
Some seem to suggest ...
4
votes
2answers
343 views
What do we mean when we say 't Hooft proved that Standard Model is renormalizable?
This question is inspired from Why should the Standard Model be renormalizable? Ron Maimon says that standard model is renormalizable, and though there seems to be conflicting (?) answers. Is this ...
6
votes
0answers
106 views
Question about the vacua of the Standard Model
This question is probably based on a misunderstanding. Please correct me if I'm wrong, and if unclear, I'll try to put it in a clearer language.
In Yang-Mills theory such as the theory of strong ...
12
votes
2answers
230 views
Determination of the global structure of the SM gauge group
The Standard Model of particle physics can be constructed by specifying its gauge group $G$ and the representations of the fields (plus some extra information: Lorentz invariance, values of the ...
2
votes
0answers
49 views
The role of the renormalization scale in the functional renormalization group
On p. 28 of Bertrand Delamotte's Introduction to the Nonperturbative Renormalization Group he writes
$k$ [the renormalization scale] acts as an infrared regulator (for $k \neq 0$) somewhat similar ...
11
votes
3answers
598 views
Books on non-perturbative phenomena in quantum field theory
I am looking for any good places (preferably textbooks) to study about introductory non-perturbative phenomena in Quantum field theory.
Any suggestion will be appreciated.
3
votes
0answers
202 views
What is the current situation about triviality of $\phi^4$ theory in $d=3+1$?
I was reading a book by Franco Strocchi, this one, and in some points the author claims that the case of $d=3+1$ of triviality of $\phi^4$ theory is now proven. As far as I can tell, we have just some ...
3
votes
2answers
382 views
Effects of Topological Terms: Hopf, $\Theta$, Chern-Simons, WZW, Berry phase term
What are the effects and the differences of Topological Terms?
For example, I had known and heard several of them are called Topological,
(1) Hopf term,
(2) $\Theta$ term,
(3) Chern-Simons term,...
22
votes
3answers
3k views
Does QED really break down at the Landau pole?
In QED, the fine structure constant $\alpha$ runs upwards in the UV, with a loop calculation (involving a geometric series of the vacuum polarisation diagram) indicating a divergence in $\alpha$ at $\...
3
votes
1answer
146 views
Baryon number violation in the Standard model at the perturbative and non-perturbative level
This is a continuation of my question here.
Page 635 of this book by Matthew Schwartz effectively says that the $\partial_\mu J^\mu_B\neq 0$ where $J^\mu_B$ is the baryon current i.e., the baryon ...
0
votes
1answer
68 views
Non-Perturbative effects QCD and the Standard Model?
I read in an article that the Standard Model leaves unanswered questions about the non-perturbative effects of the QCD.
I have basic knowledge about the perturbative and non-perturbative QCD. Could ...
3
votes
2answers
297 views
Why is the WKB tunneling amplitude a non-perturbative result?
The tunneling amplitude obtained from WKB aprroximation is given by $$|T(E)|=\exp\Big\{-\frac{1}{\hbar}\int\limits_{x_1}^{x_2}dx[2(V(x)-E)]^{1/2}\Big\}[1+O(\hbar)]$$ where $x_1$ and $x_2$ are the ...
3
votes
2answers
136 views
Is renormalizability only a problem in perturbation theory?
As far as I know, renormalization is needed when a scattering amplitude is divergent at some order of the coupling constant in a perturbation theory. So my question is whether the divergence (and thus ...
5
votes
2answers
476 views
Are perturbative and non-perturbative QCD both signs of new physics?
I was studying about quarkonia systems and reached this page at CERN Courier. Here, I came across the following text:
While the failure to reproduce an experimental observable that is ...
4
votes
2answers
528 views
Meaning of perturbative and non-perturbative renormalizability
What is meant by a theory to be (1) perturbatively renormalizable, (2) perturbatively non-renormalizable, (3) non-perturbatively renormalizable, and non-perturbatively non-renormalizable? In each case,...
0
votes
1answer
313 views
Is the non-perturbative approach to QFT a path integral approach? If so then how, given we don't have simple path integral formula for Dirac equation?
Here is my understanding of the scenario. Please correct me if i go wrong somewhere.
Initially, the perturbative approach to QED (Feynman diagrams) was very successful. But the same approach to QCD ...
4
votes
1answer
364 views
Why is the temporal gauge $A_0=0$ so popular in discussions of non-perturbative effects?
Almost every discussion of non-perturbative effects in Yang-Mills theory mentions in passing that they work in the temporal gauge. Why is this the case?
A good example is the QCD vacuum. Almost ...
1
vote
1answer
115 views
Are all field interactions carried out through force-mediating particles?
To my knowledge, all field interactions are carried out through force-mediating particles. For example, electromagnetic interactions are carried out through exchanging photons. However, under the ...
7
votes
2answers
932 views
Understanding typical non-perturbative calculations in QFT [closed]
Perturbative calculations in quantum field theory are based on S-matrix expansion and calculating the Feynman diagrams. These Feynman diagrams are related to the scattering cross-sections and decay ...
3
votes
1answer
156 views
Reference request for non-perturbative QCD
I am looking for some good books or lecture notes that discuss non-perturbative aspects of QCD such as: chiral symmetry and chiral symmetry breaking; the QCD phase transition and the QCD phase diagram;...
12
votes
1answer
363 views
On the asymptotics of interacting correlation functions
Consider an interacting QFT (for example, in the context of the Wightman axioms). Let $G_2(x)$ be the two-point function of some field $\phi(x)$:
$$
G_2(x)=\langle \phi(x)\phi(0)\rangle
$$
Question: ...
3
votes
0answers
246 views
Perturbative coupling for QFT
I'm confused about the definition of a perturbative coupling for QFT that it should be less than 4 $\pi$, because the higher order corrections comes of order $\lambda/(4 \pi)$ ..
Now why QCD is not ...
5
votes
0answers
195 views
Higher category theory, renormalization, and non-perturbative QFTs
I'm (vaguely) aware of certain uses of higher category theory in attempts to mathematically understand quantum field theories -- for example, Lurie's work on eTQFTs, the recent-ish book by Paugam, and ...
4
votes
0answers
264 views
Non-perturbative approach to QFT in Hamiltonian formalism?
A simple conceptual question today: is it true that QFT can only be approached in a non-perturbative way only through the functional methods (like 1/N), while in the Hamiltonian formalism we can only ...
9
votes
4answers
486 views
Mass Renormalization: Geometric Series of One Particle Irreducible Diagrams
Pretty much everywhere I look it is stated that the full two point Green function (let's say for the Klein-Gordon field) is a geometric series in the one particle irreducible diagrams, ie. in momentum ...
4
votes
1answer
98 views
Why do we have to sum the expansions around all the action's stationary points?
This is in some sense a follow-up question to my previous question Why is it OK to keep the quadratic term in the small $\hbar$ approximation?. I understand how we can expand the action around a ...
4
votes
1answer
96 views
Experimental observation of non-perturbative effects
Many quantum field theories come with non-perturbative objects such as solitons and instantons, and non-perturbative effects such as the Schwinger effect. However, it is hard to find any review on ...
4
votes
1answer
157 views
Is CP problem the problem?
I've heard an argument that the question of smallness of QCD $\theta$ parameter is called the problem (namely, strong CP problem), since the other dimensionless couplings (like $\alpha_{s}$), are of ...
5
votes
2answers
172 views
Why cannot a fundamental string couple to the R-R gauge field $C_{\mu\nu}$?
People usually say that D-branes can carry R-R charges, or can couple to R-R sector gauge fields. But why a fundamental string cannot couple to a 2-form R-R sector gauge field? What's the essential ...
4
votes
0answers
195 views
Some questions about QCD [closed]
About QCD, I have two questions. I know I should propose one question one time, but they are actually two steps of the same question: Non-perturbative aspects of QCD.
1, Why do we need to solve QCD ...
