2
$\begingroup$

I am reading Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell by A.Zee. In Chapter 5 Section 6, Under the subtitle A nonperturbative phenomenon, He commented

"That the mass of the kink comes out inversely proportional to the coupling is a clear sign that field theorists could have done perturbation theory till they were blue in the face without ever discovering the kink."

I don't quite get the meaning of the sentence, why this is a clear sign? Why does it imply non-perturbative effects? What is the non-perturbative effects he was referring to?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
5
$\begingroup$

More generally, if one is doing perturbation theory in some coupling constant $g$, the result is a power series in $g$, i.e. non-negative powers of $g$. To get negative/inverse powers of $g$, one must include non-perturbative effects.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.