Perturbative expansions of a function $f(x)$ around say $x=0$ cannot determine contributions from a function such as $e^{-1/x}$ since its Taylor series vanishes to all orders. This kind of contributions are usually called non-perturbative effects.
Asymptotic series approximate a function until some order but do not converge to the exact value.
I want to understand the relationship between non-perturbative effects and asymptotic series. Does every asymptotic series have contribution from functions with vanishing Taylor coefficients? Are contributions from functions with vanishing Taylor coefficients the (only) reason asymptotic series do not converge?
This seems unlikely to me because if we consider an exact function $p(x)$ describing the non-perturbative part of a function $f(x)$ and consider a Taylor series of $f(x)$ up to order $n$, let's call it $f_n(x)$ then I think we can have $f_n(x)$ running of to a random terrible function for large $n$ such that it is unlikely that $p(x)$ can correct it to the exact constant value at large $n$.
Can the contribution from functions such as $e^{-1/x}$ actually ever be reason that a series is asymptotic? It seems not. For example I can construct a function $f(x)= \sum_n^5 a_n x^n + e^{-1/x}$ which clearly converges in the sense that the value no longer changes after $n>5$. Thus, it is not a asymptotic series. Yet I would miss a non-perturbative contribution in the Taylor series.
It might be that there is no relation at all between asymptotic series and $e^{-1/x}$ type effects. These two things might be orthogonal in that both asymptotic and convergent series can have these effects. A good answer showing this would of course be appreciated. Yet one hint that there is a connection is for example that the Borel re-summation of a asymptotic series can contain information on $e^{-1/x}$ type effects.