4
$\begingroup$

Imagine a galaxy millions of lightyears away and, obeying Hubble's law, moving very quickly away from us.

Now imagine the same galaxy emitted a green photon in our direction (a photon with a frequency of $f_g$.) That photon reached earth, due to the redshift, with a frequency $f_r$, with $f_g>f_r$. That means photon $f_g$ left the distant galaxy with an energy of $H_g=hf_g$, but when it reached Earth, it had an energy of $H_r=hf_r$.

But $H_r < H_g$, so where did the difference between the energies go?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ possible duplicate of Redshifting of Light and the expansion of the universe $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Commented Jul 19, 2015 at 1:51
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I'm going to throw this out there, but to the observer, it's never a green Photon, it's always red. To the object that generates the photon, it's always green, The energy changes if the frame of reference changes, but that's true for Newtonian physics as well, like throwing baseballs off a train. $\endgroup$
    – userLTK
    Commented Jul 19, 2015 at 3:10

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Where does the energy go when light is redshifted?

It doesn't go anywhere. Let's say we're motionless with respect to some source which is emitting a stream of photons. We agree that the photons have some energy E=hf. Now let's say I push you such that you're moving away from the source. You now claim that the photons are redshifted, but those photons haven't changed one jot. Instead you have. I did work on you, I added energy to you. The photon energy hasn't changed, but yours has, so your measurement of the photon energy has reduced. You might say you're going faster than you were, so you measure the selfsame photon energy as reduced. Even though it hasn't, because conservation of energy applies.

It's similar for gravitational redshift$^*$. Let's say we're down on the ground near some source which is emitting a stream of vertical photons. We agree that the photons have some energy E=hf. Now let's say I lift you up away from the source. You now claim that the photons are redshifted, but those photons haven't changed one jot. Instead you have. I did work on you, I added energy to you. The photon energy hasn't changed, but yours has, so your measurement of the photon energy has reduced. At the higher elevation there's less gravitational time dilation. Your clocks are now going faster than they were, so you measure the selfsame photon energy as reduced. Even though it hasn't, because conservation of energy applies.

Now imagine the same galaxy emitted a green photon in our direction (a photon with a frequency of fg). That photon reached earth, due to the redshift, with a frequency fr... where did the difference between the energies go?

It didn't go anywhere. Your and your clocks are now going faster than they were, so you measure the selfsame photon energy as reduced. Even though it hasn't, because conservation of energy applies.

$*$ And blue shift. Throw a 511keV photon into a black hole and the mass increases by 511keV/c². Conservation of energy applies.

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ This should be the accepted answer. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 11, 2018 at 20:39
  • $\begingroup$ @JossieCalderon This answer basically says the opposite of the accepted answer in the second linked question. $\endgroup$
    – Michael
    Commented Aug 14, 2019 at 16:22
  • $\begingroup$ @Michael then that answer is wrong. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 14, 2019 at 16:35
  • $\begingroup$ Where does the energy go when light is redshifted? John Duffield concludes: "It didn't go anywhere. Your and your clocks are now going faster than they were, so you measure the selfsame photon energy as reduced. Even though it hasn't, because conservation of energy applies." I have difficulties to understand. How do you come to this conclusion? Can you please give a more detailed explanation or a mathematical derivation? [email protected] $\endgroup$
    – Rene Kail
    Commented Nov 12, 2023 at 4:46
  • $\begingroup$ Very good answer +1 $\endgroup$
    – mick
    Commented Apr 13 at 23:53
2
$\begingroup$

Nobody ever said that different observers have to agree on the energy of a photon (or anything else). The invariant quantity is energy squared minus momentum squared (i.e. rest mass), which is equal to zero whether the photon is red or green. (Edited to add: I see now that userLTK already said as much in a comment.)

$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.