3
$\begingroup$

Given that the universe is expanding over time, in the sense that the (spatial) metric is changing over time, corresponding to the physical distance between objects increasing, naïve intuition leads me to the conclusion that the wavelength of a photon travelling from a distant galaxy (receding us) will be stretched, and consequently its frequency will decrease, leading to the energy of the photon decreasing (with this energy simply being lost, since time translation symmetry is broken due to the big-bang). The problem with this is, relative to another observer, wouldn't the wavelength be stretched by a different amount and hence the redshift the photon will be different, corresponding to a different amount of energy being lost by the photon.

This all leaves me feeling confused on the subject. Does the photon actually get redshifted and lose energy due to cosmic expansion, or is it simply an observer effect (akin to the standard Doppler effect). It does seem a little counter intuitive that a photon would lose energy simply due to its propagation through space?!

Is the whole point of this that it is an observer dependent phenomenon and the energy of an object is an observer dependent quantity (energy is not conserved one moves between two different frames of reference)?!

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

You need to concentrate on the observer making the measurements. Photons carry energy, but they don't lose energy just because they travel. The "loss" of energy is not the cause of the redshift, only if the photon scatters off something will it lose energy.

However, not all observers will agree that photon has the same amount of energy. Assume you are in a frame in which the photon is observed as green. An observer in a different frame moving relative to yours measures the photon as red.

Because measurements are made in different reference frames, the conservation of energy principle is not violated. Ultimately the energy of a photon is frequency dependent and different observers measure different frequencies.

Analogously, if you toss a coin whilst being driven, the coin has a different velocity to you, as to that measured by a bystander. Keep in mind that energy is conserved within each reference frame. The law of energy states that, in any given reference frame, the amount of energy doesn't change, but it does not apply to the way in which the energy in one frame is related to the energy in another frame.

A good read on this is Preposterous Universe.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ While this is correct, the beginner is still left with the question how nature can accelerate non-co-located observers and their infinitesimally small inertial frames relative to each other without expending energy. $\endgroup$ – CuriousOne Jul 9 '16 at 20:54
  • $\begingroup$ @count_to_10 So is it essentially like the ordinary Doppler effect, in that the energy of photon hasn't changed from what it was when it was emitted by the source, but it's energy depends on the reference frame in which it is measured in?! Is the point that it is the 4-momentum that is frame independent, and not energy (or momentum) on its own?! $\endgroup$ – user35305 Jul 9 '16 at 20:56
  • $\begingroup$ Answers from people more experienced than me, by a long way. physics.stackexchange.com/questions/214983/… and the questions on the right hand side. $\endgroup$ – user108787 Jul 9 '16 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ @count_to_10 Thanks for the links. Mathematically, the frame dependence of energy quantified by $E'=\frac{\partial x'^{0}}{\partial x^{\nu}}p^{\nu}$, right ($p^{\nu}$ is the 4-momentum with respect to the unprimed frame, and $E':=p^{0}$ is the zeroth component of the 4-momentum with respect to the primed frame)? $\endgroup$ – user35305 Jul 9 '16 at 21:31
  • $\begingroup$ @count_to_10 Ah ok, thanks for taking a look. A mixture really. I've been reading Sean Carroll's lecture notes, and Wald's GR book, in particular. $\endgroup$ – user35305 Jul 10 '16 at 10:41
1
$\begingroup$

A simple addition to the right answer from @Countto10.

So they have Doppler shifts. the question might be, for cosmic microwave background photons, that red shift is with respect to what? The answer is that it is with respect to the so called comoving frame, the frame of reference which is (in a way) the frame of reference expanding with the universe - thus co-moving . It is also the frame of reference from which the cosmic microwave background (and the average universe) looks isotropic and homogeneous.

When measured those red shifts will include our motion wrt to those comoving coordinates, our so called peculiar velocity. That includes out motion around the sun, the Sun's around the Galaxy, the Galaxy around its cluster, and the cluster's.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.