# Earliest terrestrial planet?

If I've understood correctly, the heavier elements needed for terrestrial planets such as iron can only form in supernova.

If that is indeed true, how long since the beginning of the universe would it take to create the first non gaseous planets? Is earth in anyway an "early" terrestrial planet?

Stars are divided (this is only an approximate distinction) into Population I, Population II and Population III. Population I stars are the relatively young stars like the Sun that we see around us today, while Population II are older stars that have a low but non-zero metal content (in this context a metal is any element heavier than Helium i.e. those elements synthesised in stars rather than the Big Bang). Population III stars have never been observed: they are the hypothetical first generation of stars that formed from the primordial hydrogen/helium mixture left by the Big Bang.

Population III stars are believed to have formed the first metals then gone supernova and dispersed them into the interstellar gas. The next generation of Population II stars inherited these metals, which is why we see them in the stars spectra but at low levels. The Population II stars in turn generated the higher levels of metals that we see in Population I stars like the Sun.

The question is whether the metal concentration left behind by the Population III stars was high enough to form rocky planets, and I don't think anyone has a precise answer. I found quite a nice article discussing the history of planet formation, but the authors don't risk giving estimates for the formation of the first planets, though they do say:

A planet as massive and dense as the Earth could only form once stars and supernovae had enriched the gas with an abundance of heavy elements that is at least 10 percent that in the Sun

Incidentally, although we have never directly observed a Population III star it's believed that these stars were enormous compared to most stars today, and their deaths created gamma ray bursts that we can observe. In particular GRB 090423 may have come from a Population III star as it happened about 13 billion years ago.

The oldest star know to have planets is HIP 11952 (well, it was when I last looked - this is a rapidly changing area). However this star has a metallicity only 1% that of the Sun, and the two planets found are more like Jupiter than the Earth. Whether the system has, or had (the two hot Jupiters may have ejected them) rocky planets we can't say.

One of the oldest known galaxies with a metallicity high enough to form terrestrial planets is a quasar that formed about 2.8 billion years after the Big Bang. Obviously we'll never know if any of the stars in that galaxy actually have terrestrial planets.

• Quick note for the unwary: astronomers tend to call a "metal" any element above lithium or so. – Emilio Pisanty Jan 29 '14 at 20:21

The Earth was born $4.55\pm 0.05$ billion years ago which is $9.25\pm 0.05$ billion years after the Big Bang.

The oldest supernova we now is "Supernova 9933" which was born or exploded about 6 billion years after the Big Bang – when the age of the Universe was just 2/3 of the age during the birth of the Solar System (one needs some time for the large enough stars to live and die and go supernova). But only "now", the light from the supernova is reaching our telescopes because the object is very far.

It's likely that some planets with iron were born even around this very Supernova 9933. The Earth is therefore comparably old to the oldest planets with iron but it's not quite among the record holders.

• This oldest known supernova is a lower limit on the lookback time to the earliest supernova... It's usually thought that the first stars formed about 400 Myr after the big bang, much earlier than SN9933. The first stars are also thought to be very massive, and massive stars die (and go SN) very quickly, in only a few Myr. I have no idea how long it takes to build up enough metal enrichment to make a terrestrial planet, though... – Kyle Oman Jan 30 '14 at 7:37