I'm trying to demonstrate the following identity:
$$R_z(\theta) = e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar} L_z\theta}$$
I know the more general relation has $J_z$ and not $L_z$, but I'm only interested in showing it for the latter. If I write down Schrödinger's equation:
$$i\hbar\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t} = H\Psi$$
it is clear I can pass the term $i\hbar$ to the right hand side of the equation, and it is also quite clear the solution can be expressed by exponentiating the right hand side:
$$\Psi = e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar} H t}\Psi_0$$
where $U=e^{\frac{-i}{\hbar} H t}$ is the time evolution unitary operator. Let us now recall that $L_z=-i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}$ , so we can write the equation: $$\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial \theta} = \frac{\pmb{+}i}{\hbar}L_z\Psi$$
Essentially, this is just another Schrödinger equation, where instead of time evolution we now have a rotation. Proceeding as before, the solution can be written as the matrix resulting from exponentiating the right hand side acting on some initial state $\Psi_0$:
$$\Psi = e^{\frac{\pmb{+}i}{\hbar} L_z\theta}\Psi_0$$
therefore, the rotation operator I get has the opposite sign compared to the one I should be getting. Why is this? I' thinking maybe by writing the problem this way I'm performing a rotation around the $-z$ axis instead of the $z$ axis, which would explain the $+$ sign I'm getting instead of the $-$ sign I should be getting. However, since I'm taking the derivative with respect to positive $\theta$ (that is to say, how my wavefunction evolves as I rotate it anticlockwise, which corresponds to the $+z$ direction), I would expect to get the corresponding negative sign in the exponent.