1
$\begingroup$

I was studying the topic -"Fixed Axis Rotation " from the book Kleppner Kolenkow -The Introduction to Mechanics. Please clarify the meaning of the $v_j$ variable which I have indicated in the photo below. If I interpret $v_j$ as the speed of particle j, even for $\vec v_j$ restricted to the $xy$ plane that seems wrong in general.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Any component of $\boldsymbol{r}_j$ that is parallel to $\boldsymbol{v}_j$ is ignored due to the cross product, and only the perpendicular distance remains.

That perpendicular distance is designated as $\rho_j$ in the book.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Updated, clearer answer

I suppress the $j$ subscript indicating the $j^{th}$ particle in the following answer, but I am implicitly addressing particle j.

Using cylindrical polar coordinates, the position $\vec r = \rho\hat h + z\hat k$ where $\rho$ is the distance from the origin in the $xy$ plane, $z$ the distance in the increasing vertical direction, $\hat h$ a unit vector in the increasing $\rho$ direction, and $\hat k$ a unit vector in the increasing $z$ direction. The velocity vector $\vec v = \dot \rho \hat h + \rho \dot \phi\hat l + \dot z\hat k$ where $\phi$ is the azimuthal angle in the $xy$ plane and $\hat l$ a unit vector in the increasing $\phi$ direction. Or we can say $\vec v = v_h \hat h + v_l\hat l + v_k\hat k$ where $v_h = \dot \rho, v_l = \rho \dot \phi, v_k = \dot z$.

The $\hat k$ component of $\vec r \times m\vec v$ is $m\rho^2\dot \phi$, or $m \rho v_l$. so, $L_z = m\rho^2\dot \phi$.

I think I see your concern. To me, $v$ indicates the magnitude of $\vec v$ which is $ \sqrt{v_h^2 + v_l^2 + v_k^2} $ in general. Even for $\vec v$ restricted to the $xy$ plane where $v_k$ is zero, $v$ is not $v_l$ unless $\vec v$ has no component in the $\hat h$ direction.

In general, $\vec v = \vec \omega \times \vec r$. However, the book says "consider a body rotating about the z axis". With this constraint, $\vec \omega = \omega \hat k$ and $\omega = \dot \phi$; $v_h$ is zero, $v = v_l = \rho \omega$, and $L_z = m \rho^2 \omega$. Note, even with this constraint, $\vec L = \vec r \times m \vec v = -mz\rho\omega\hat h + m\rho^2\omega\hat k$ so $\vec L$ is not totally in the z ($\hat k$) direction.

Since we are dealing with a rigid body, $\vec \omega$ is the same for every particle in the body.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.