0
$\begingroup$

We can express plane wave in terms of a spherical waves in 3D as: \begin{equation} e^{ikz}=\frac{2\pi i}{k}\delta(\vec{n}-\vec{e}_z)\frac{e^{ikr}}{r}+\frac{2\pi i}{k}\delta(\vec{n}+\vec{e}_z)\frac{e^{-ikr}}{r} \end{equation}

Where $\vec{n}$: vector in radial direction

and $\vec{e}_z$: basis vector in z direction

I want to know what is it's analogue in 2D ?

$\endgroup$
1
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ That expression is incorrect. (For a quick look at why, evaluate it along the x or y axes.) Why do you think it holds? $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 22, 2022 at 9:22

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

3D Case: your expansion is wrong

The expression you wrote is not right, here is the correct expansion: using spherical coordinates $(r,\theta, \phi)$, there is something called partial wave decomposition, and for the wave $e^{i\vec k\cdot\vec r}$ it gives

$$e^{i\vec k\cdot\vec r} =\sum_{l=0}^{+\infty}i^l(2l+1)j_l(kr)P_l(\cos \theta)$$ where $\theta$ is the angle between the vertors $\vec k$ (the direction of propagation) and $\vec r$, $P_l(x)$ are the Legendre polynomials https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legendre_polynomials and the $j_l(x)$ are the modified Bessel functions of the first kind https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bessel_function#Modified_Bessel_functions.

In the particular case of a wave propagating in the $z$ direction, i.e $\theta=0$, $\cos\theta=1$, the decomposition semplifies because $P_l(1)=1 \quad\forall l$.

The most interesting aspect though, is that these Bessel functions are oscillating functions with a decreasing amplitude, and for large $r=|\vec r|$ it can be shown that is valid the approximation

$$j_l(kr)\approx \dfrac{1}{kr}\sin\left( kr-l\frac{\pi}{2} \right)= \dfrac{1}{2ikr}\left(e^{ikr}e^{-il\pi/2}-e^{-ikr}e^{il\pi/2}\right)=\\ \dfrac{1}{2ikr}\left((-i)^le^{ikr}-i^le^{-ikr}\right)$$

So, for large $r$ it is clear that we have a decomposition in outgoing and ingoing spherical waves. I don't know your background, but in quantum mechanics each term is the component of a free particle with angular momentum $l$, and this is relevant in scattering theory.

2D case

Similarly to the 3D case it can be shown in 2D, using polar coordinates, that it is valid the expansion $$e^{i\vec k\cdot\vec r}=e^{ikr\cos\theta}=\sum_{m=0}^{+\infty}\epsilon_mi^m\cos(m\theta)J_m(kr)$$ where $\epsilon_0=1$ and $\epsilon_m=2\forall m>0$, where the functions $J_m(x)$ are another kind of Bessel functions (cylindrical Bessel functions) that have a similar approximation for large $r$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.