3
$\begingroup$

For a perfectly conducting and perfectly dielectric interface, I understood that tangential component of electric field is zero and continuous. But I have read that the normal component of magnetic field is also zero. I have read this in the chapter of guided waves between a pair of infinite parallel conducting planes. While I understand that variation in normal component of magnetic field at the interface would produce a non-zero tangential electric field which violates the first condition, why can't there be a constant normal component of magnetic field at the boundary of the conducting plane? Why should it be zero?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

There can be, so long as in addition to being constant, it is curl-free.

Ampere's law says that the curl of magnetic field is produced by a current density or time-varying electric field. Since neither is present just outside the interface, then the magnetic field is curl-free there.

Faraday's law says that a time-varying normal component of the magnetic field would produce a non-zero tangential electric field, so the normal component of the magnetic must be stationary. In fact, whatever the curl of the electric field, you can always add a stationary magnetic field without changing the RHS of Faraday's law.

The above conditions allow a stationary, curl-free (and of course divergence-free) magnetic field to be present. The normal component of that field will be continuous across the boundary.

A stationary, curl-free, magnetic field can be superposed onto any solution of Maxwell's equations without affecting the time-dependent electric and magnetic fields.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.