0
$\begingroup$

I am currently studying the textbook Microwave Engineering, fourth edition, by David Pozar. Section Fields at a Dielectric Interface of chapter 1.3 FIELDS IN MEDIA AND BOUNDARY CONDITIONS says the following:

At an interface between two lossless dielectric materials, no charge or surface current densities will ordinarily exist. Equations (1.31), (1.32), (1.36), and (1.37) then reduce to $$\hat{n} \cdot \bar{D}_1 = \hat{n} \cdot \bar{D}_2, \tag{1.38a}$$ $$\hat{n} \cdot \bar{B}_1 = \hat{n} \cdot \bar{B}_2, \tag{1.38b}$$ $$\hat{n} \times \bar{E}_1 = \hat{n} \times \bar{E}_2, \tag{1.38c}$$ $$\hat{n} \times \bar{H}_1 = \hat{n} \times \bar{H}_2. \tag{1.38d}$$

In words, these equations state that the normal components of $\bar{D}$ and $\bar{B}$ are continuous across the interface, and the tangential components of $\bar{E}$ and $\bar{H}$ are continuous across the interface. Because Maxwell's equations are not all linearly independent, the six boundary conditions in the above equations are not all linearly independent. Thus, the enforcement of (1.38c) and (1.38d) for the four tangential field components, for example, will automatically force the satisfaction of the equations for the continuity of the normal components.

Section Fields at a General Material Interface says the following:

Fields at a General Material Interface
Consider a plane interface between two media, as shown in Figure 1.5. Maxwell's equations in integral form can be used to deduce conditions involving the normal and tangential fields at this interface. enter image description here The time-harmonic version of (1.4), where $S$ is the closed "pillbox"-shaped surface shown in Figure 1.6, can be written as $$\oint_S \bar{D} \cdot d\bar{s} = \int_V \rho \ dv. \tag{1.29}$$ In the limit as $h \to 0$, the contribution of $D_\text{tan}$ through the sidewalls goes to zero, so (1.29) reduces to $$\Delta SD_{2n} - \Delta SD_{1n} = \Delta S \rho_s,$$ or $$D_{2n} - D_{1n} = \rho_s, \tag{1.30}$$ where $\rho_s$ is the surface charge density on the interface. In vector form, we can write $$\hat{n} \cdot (\bar{D}_2 - \bar{D}_1) = \rho_s. \tag{1.31}$$ enter image description here A similar argument for $\hat{B}$ leads to the result that $$\hat{n} \cdot \bar{B}_2 = \hat{n} \cdot \bar{B}_1, \tag{1.32}$$ because there is no free magnetic charge.

For the tangential components of the electric field we use the phasor form of (1.6), $$\oint_C \bar{E} \cdot d\bar{l} = -j\omega \int_S \bar{B} \cdot d\bar{s} - \int_S \bar{M} \cdot d \bar{s}, \tag{1.33}$$ in connection with the closed contour $C$ shown in Figure 1.7. In the limit as $h \to 0$, the surface integral of $\bar{B}$ vanishes (because $S = h \Delta \mathscr{l}$ vanishes). The contribution from the surface integral of $\bar{M}$, however, may be nonzero if a magnetic surface current density $\bar{M}_s$ exists on the surface. The Dirac delta function can then be used to write $$\bar{M} = \bar{M}_s \delta(h), \tag{1.34}$$ where $h$ is a coordinate measured normal from the surface. Equation (1.33) then gives $$\Delta \mathscr{l} E_{t1} - \Delta \mathscr{l} E_{t2} = -\Delta \mathscr{l} M_s,$$ or $$E_{t1} - E_{t2} = -M_s, \tag{1.35}$$ which can be generalised in vector form as $$(\bar{E}_2 - \bar{E}_1) \times \hat{n} = \bar{M}_s. \tag{1.36}$$ enter image description here A similar argument for the magnetic field leads to $$\hat{n} \times (\bar{H}_2 - \bar{H}_1) = \bar{J}_s, \tag{1.37}$$ where $\bar{J}_s$ is an electric surface density that may exist at the interface. Equations (1.31), (1.32), (1.36), and (1.37) are the most general expressions for the boundary conditions at an arbitrary interface of materials and/or surface currents.

I'm confused by this part:

Because Maxwell's equations are not all linearly independent, the six boundary conditions in the above equations are not all linearly independent.

What are the six boundary conditions that this is referring to?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

The six boundary equations being: two for the tangential components of each of $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{H}$, and one for the normal components of each of $\mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{H}$. Or $\mathbf{D}$ and $\mathbf{B}$ if you like, they are of course related by the constitutive relations $\mathbf{D} = \varepsilon \mathbf{E}$ and $\mathbf{B} = \mu \mathbf{H}$.

Maxwell's equations are not independent, as you might remember from my my answer to a previous question of yours. This means that if a result satisfies boundary condition 1.38c, it must automatically satisfy 1.38b. The same goes for 1.38d and 1.38a respectively.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, but what are the boundary conditions specifically? That's why I included the previous section: I can't tell which of the equations from the previous section are the six "boundary conditions" being referred to. $\endgroup$ Apr 9, 2022 at 2:49
  • $\begingroup$ 1.38c and 1.38d are four equations total, since each applies to the two coordinates tangential to the surface.1.38a and 1.38b are two equations, since there is only one coordinate normal to the surface. $\endgroup$ Apr 11, 2022 at 7:05
  • $\begingroup$ So equations 1.38a-1.38d are actually the boundary conditions? I interpreted the statement to mean that the boundary conditions were given in the previous section (Fields at a General Material Interface), which is why I was wondering what precisely (which equations from the previous section) they were. $\endgroup$ Apr 11, 2022 at 9:24
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, they are the boundary conditions at an interface. $\endgroup$ Apr 11, 2022 at 10:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.