I'm trying to do a simple simulation of a solar panel coupled through some piping to a boiler, with the aid of a pump. My input constants could be something like: volume of liquid inside the panel, volume of liquid inside the boiler, pump transfer rate.

For simplicity I can assume that connective piping does not absorb any heat, so panel and boiler are coupled next to each other through some hole and thermally insulated from another.
Possible constants: ambient temperature, heat loss (depends on ambient temperature).

The variables: panel temperature, boiler temperature, whether the pump is running or not.

What I'm doing right now is like linear estimation, applying some energy to the panel (raises the heat linearly), running the pump transfers linearly energy from one vessel to another (temperature increase/decrease is inversely proportional to volume of liquid), heat transfer to boiler raises its energy linearly.

I would like to have some thing like: estimating the rise and fall of temperature in both vessels given the above constants and variables. It doesn't have to be scientifically exact, but I know that linear aproximation is wrong as the temperature increase is somehow inversely proportional to absolute temperature (i.e. it 'tapers').
The end result will be like: apply xxx units (Joules) of energy to solar panel for 1 minute > temperature rises by y degrees; start pump (open valve) for 1 minute -> temperature in boiler goes up by z degrees, temperature in panel goes down by w degrees.

Any graphs or formulas will be helpful, I can continue from there. This is not a homework or scientific study, just something for personal use.
Also some explanations about differences between water and oil energy absorbtion would be nice.

  • $\begingroup$ A boiler is an apparatus to produce steam from warter, since Papin, Newcomen and Watt. $\endgroup$
    – Georg
    Jul 26, 2011 at 17:25
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ (a) Solar heat can boil water. (b) The word "boiler" includes other liquids which may boil at a temperature lower than water. For example, see the glossary at the US Patent Office: "BOILER = Used as a generic term for a liquid heater. The nature of the liquid heated is immaterial." uspto.gov/web/patents/classification/uspc122/defs122.htm $\endgroup$ Jul 26, 2011 at 21:01
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "A boiler is a closed vessel in which water or other fluid is heated." - I'm using this definition. The boiler provides heated water to a residential building. It is heated by gas/electrical means/other but can also exchange heat with the solar panel. However, I don't think there is such a huge confusion here, the boiler is only a large energy tank in my simulation. $\endgroup$
    – brainwash
    Jul 27, 2011 at 8:34
  • $\begingroup$ I realized that "EnergyNumbers" sports in setting this "renewable Energy" tag. For that reason I'd like to know what kind of energy this is. Is is energy which grows old and can be rejuvenated? Is this energy outside the laws of thermodynamics? Is it radiative, mechanic, or what ever? $\endgroup$
    – Georg
    Jul 31, 2011 at 18:00
  • $\begingroup$ To me it is renewable in the sense that it's energy that you can use (house heating, domestic hot water) and then it can be replenished. $\endgroup$
    – brainwash
    Aug 1, 2011 at 12:47

1 Answer 1


Some notes to get you on your way:

Power in full sunlight at sea level $\approx 1kW/m^2$ - remember to adjust for relative angle of sun and solar panel.

Specific heat capacity of water: 4.186 J/g/K

Typical collector efficiency: somewhere in the range 50-90%.

Let's do a quick crude static calculation. It sounds like you're going to do a dynamic microsim - great stuff, go for it; if we can make a static estimate first, that'll give you an idea of how the numbers connect to each other, and give you a ballpark number to check the output of your simulation against.

Let's take the sun to be shining directly on the panel, along the normal to the plate, so the power hitting the plate is $1000 W/m^2$. Let's assume a 60% efficiency, so we're putting $600 W/m^2$ into the heat transfer fluid. Let's ignore any anti-freeze for the moment, and just assume our heat-transfer fluid is pure water, thus having a specific heat capacity of 4.186 J/g/K. Now, if you had 1 litre of water collecting heat per square metre, then you'd raise its temperature by $$\frac{600 W}{1000 g \times 4.186 J /g/K} \approx 0.14 K/s$$

Now, here's a quick calculation for a whole day. Let's take a ball-park figure of 6 full sun-hours (that's 16 hours of summer daylight, derated by guesstimate to account for the variation of angle between panel and sun), and a 200-litre thermal storage tank; then our increase in temperature of the tank in a day, from a single square metre of collector would be, to the first order, be: $$\Delta T_{tank} = \frac{0.14 K/s \times 3600 s/h \times 6 h}{200} \approx 15 K$$ So a $4m^2$ system would give you $\Delta T_{tank} \approx 60 K$ . Then that would get derated, based on system losses, including thermal losses from the collector plate and the thermal store.

Heat loss from the panel itself will (broadly) be proportional to the difference between the heat-transfer fluid, and the ambient air temperature - that gives the tapering you mentioned.

And you'll need a figure for the rate at which heat can be exchanged between the heat-transfer fluid that passes through the collector, and the thermal store.

(See also Appendix H of SAP 2009 which starts on pdf p73 - but bear in mind that that's a coarse static approximation of a solar thermal system in the UK, not a dynamic simulation - but it has some figures to get you started on collector efficiency and thermal losses)

  • $\begingroup$ Great answer, more than I bargained for! I'm actually simulating a tracking solar panel and again approximating the received energy as a cosine relative to the axis Sun-Earth, this was my main purpose. However it is nice as now I can get to work with absolute units not just gross aproximations. $\endgroup$
    – brainwash
    Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46
  • $\begingroup$ I need to get to 15 reputation on this, but I will definitely vote the answer up, whether it is the accepted one or not. $\endgroup$
    – brainwash
    Aug 1, 2011 at 16:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.