0
$\begingroup$

I'm doing a calculation where I have a number of traces of just two slashed matrices. When Calculating a Dirac trace of two slashed matrices, we have the identity: $$Tr[\displaystyle{\not} a \displaystyle{\not} b] = a_\mu b_\nu Tr[\gamma^\mu\ \gamma^\nu] = 4a_\mu b_\nu \eta^{\mu\nu} = 4(a\cdot b). $$

A handful of these traces have a negative sign in them, $$Tr[- \displaystyle{\not} a \displaystyle{\not} b]. $$

Can I just ANTI-commute the two matrices to eliminate the negative sign, $$Tr[- \displaystyle{\not} a \displaystyle{\not} b] = Tr[\displaystyle{\not}b \displaystyle{\not} a],$$ and then use the cycling property to move the a matrix back to the front $$Tr[\displaystyle{\not}b \displaystyle{\not} a] = Tr[\displaystyle{\not}a \displaystyle{\not} b]? $$

Does this mean, $$Tr[-\displaystyle{\not}a \displaystyle{\not} b] = Tr[\displaystyle{\not}a \displaystyle{\not} b]? $$ Have I made a gross mistake in my understanding of commuting gamma matrices? Or is this a fun quirk of the Clifford algebra that happens when you are taking the trace of only two matrices?

Edit: I misspoke or maybe was too loose with my language when I originally posted this. I am specifically interested in the Dirac gamma matrices which follow the anti-commutation relation, $$ \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu = 2 \eta^{\mu\nu}.$$ Does this change anything? or is my conclusion still wrong.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The anti-commutation relation says that they don’t anti-commute. If they anti-commuted the right side would be zero. $\endgroup$
    – Ghoster
    Commented Oct 23 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ @Ghoster Thank you! I was getting it twisted with the fact that the gamma-5 matrix does anti-commute. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 24 at 14:44

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

Quite generally, you have ${\rm Tr}(-A B)=-{\rm Tr}(A B)=-{\rm Tr}(BA)$ for arbitrary square matrices $A$, $B$.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ +1. Let me add that $Tr(AB)=Tr(-AB)=-Tr(AB)$ implies $Tr(AB) = 0$, and hence OP's conclusion is incorrect $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 23 at 13:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.