1
$\begingroup$

I was calculating the trace of two Dirac matricies and I used their anti-commutation relations:

$$ Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}) = -Tr(\gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\mu}) - Tr(2\eta^{\mu\nu}) $$

$$ = - Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}) - 8 $$

$$Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}) = -4 $$

where I used that $2Tr(\eta^{\mu\nu})=8$, but I dont understand why it gives: $Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}) = -4\eta^{\mu\nu}$, where does the metric come from?

By the same token, when calculating $ Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\alpha} \gamma^{\beta})$:

$$ Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\alpha} \gamma^{\beta}) = Tr( - \gamma^{\beta} \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\alpha} - 2\eta^{\mu\beta} \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\alpha} + 2\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\alpha} \eta^{\nu\beta} - 2\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} \eta^{\alpha\beta}) $$

$$ 2Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu}\gamma^{\alpha} \gamma^{\beta}) = - 2\eta^{\mu\beta} Tr( \gamma^{\nu} \gamma^{\alpha}) + 2 \eta^{\nu\beta}Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\alpha}) - 2 \eta^{\alpha\beta}Tr(\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^{\nu} )$$

I dont understand why the Minkowski matrix comes out in this case in order to give the desired relation. Can someone tell me how to do it correctly?

$\endgroup$
1

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Concerning the first calculation:

The problem here is that $\eta^{\mu\nu}$ does not denote the matrix, but a component of the Minkowski metric, see also the comments and the answer to this physics SE question.

Note that the anti-commutation relations of the Dirac matrices read

$$\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\} = 2\, \eta^{\mu\nu} \,\mathbb{I} \quad ,$$

where $\mathbb{I}$ denotes the $4\times4$ identity matrix. Hence, we find that

$$ \mathrm{Tr}\, \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu = \frac{1}{2} \mathrm{Tr}\left( \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu + \gamma^\nu \gamma^\mu\right) =\frac{1}{2}\, \mathrm{Tr}\,\{\gamma^\mu,\gamma^\nu\} = \eta^{\mu\nu}\,\mathrm{Tr}\,\mathbb{I} = 4\, \eta^{\mu\nu} \quad.$$

In particular, since $\eta^{\mu\nu}$ is a number, you can pull it out of the trace operation. In the last step, we used that the trace of the $n\times n$ identity matrix is $n$.

Also note that Wikipedia contains some proofs of (trace) identities involving the gamma matrices.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.