0
$\begingroup$

THE PROBLEM

Suppose we are in stationary conditions, in which case the following Maxwell Equations hold: $$ \underline{\nabla} \cdot \underline{B} \equiv 0 \\ \underline{\nabla} \times \underline{B} = \frac{\mu_0}{4\pi} \underline{J} $$ Let $\phi(\underline{x}):=R\underline{x} + \underline{a}$ be an isometry of $\Bbb R^3$ (i.e. $R$ is ortohogonal) and suppose that all the current lies in a bounded domain (so that we can have zero boundary conditions at infinity).

I would like to prove tha following claim:

The magnetic field $\underline{B}'$ generated by the current density $\underline{J}'(\underline{x}) := R\underline{J}(\phi^{-1}(\underline{x}))$ (which is the result of the so called "active transformation" of the source under the isometry) is given by: $$ \underline{B}'(\underline{x}) = \det(R)R\underline{B}(\phi^{-1}(\underline{x})) \hspace{5mm} (1) $$


MY ATTEMPT

My idea is to use the uniqueness theorem for the magnetic field with zero boundary condition at infinity. Therefore, if I can show that (1) satisfies Maxwell's Equations I would be done. I have already verified the first equation but I have not been able to verify the second because I get stuck at:

$$[\underline{\nabla} \times \underline{B}(\underline{x})]_i = \epsilon_{ijk} \det(R) R_{km} R_{jl} \partial_l B_m(\psi^{-1}(\underline{x}))$$


Any help would be much appreciated!

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

Perhaps you can use $$ \epsilon_{ijk}R_{ai}R_{bj}R_{ck}= \epsilon_{abc} {\rm det}(R) $$ to show that $\nabla \times {\bf B}$ transforms as a 3-(pseudo?)-vector under ${\rm O}(3)$?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ That was exactly what I needed! Could you point me at a proof of this fact? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 23, 2023 at 18:23
  • $\begingroup$ $\epsilon_{ijk}R_{1i}R_{2j}R_{3k}$ is the definbition of ${\rm det}(R))$ and the extra $\epsilon_{abc}$ comes from the antisymmmetry of the determinant under interchanging colums. $\endgroup$
    – mike stone
    Commented Apr 23, 2023 at 19:41
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 23, 2023 at 19:55

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.