3
$\begingroup$

It says that flavor changing neutral currents are impossible. However I am just asking what would happen if a top quark emits a Z boson or a Higgs boson.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Neither of those are flavor-changing neutral currents. A top quark that emits a Z or a Higgs is still a top quark, just like an electron that emits a photon is still an electron. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2020 at 17:31
  • $\begingroup$ If a top quark emits a Z boson then it might change flavor, right because then the mass of the top quark will be so low that it might overlap with the masses of the up quark or the charm quark. The only major difference between top quark, up quark, and charm quark are there masses. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2020 at 17:37
  • $\begingroup$ No, it doesn't. $t\to Zu$ has never been observed, nor is it predicted to be observed. That reaction vertex is simply not included in the Standard Model. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2020 at 17:43
  • $\begingroup$ The top, up, and charm quarks differ in their flavor as well. Electromagnetism, the strong interaction, $Z$ boson exchange, and Higgs exchange all conserve flavor. The only interaction that does not is $W$ boson exchange. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2020 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ Also, the emission of a $Z$ boson does not change the mass of the top quark. $\endgroup$ Commented May 5, 2020 at 17:47

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

TL;DR: Tree-level flavour changing neutral currents are not allowed in the Standard Model. There could be, if you invent another particle or two (and indeed there are New Physics proposals about this).
But the Standard model does allow for flavour changing neutral currents with higher order diagrams, like box or penguin diagrams.

More in depth

A "flavour changing current" is a process featuring the violation of quark flavour conservation. When mediated by a neutral particle such as the $Z^0$ boson (or a photon), they do not entail a net charge exchange and are hence called "flavour changing neutral currents".

if a top quark emits a Z boson or a Higgs boson

At tree level the $Z^0$ boson cannot allow flavour mixing.

This is because the $Z^0$ boson has no charge and can hence only couple quarks of the same charge: so both $i$ and $j$ have to be $\in (u, c, t)$ or $\in (d, s, b)^\dagger$. You can show, then, the matrix element for the tree level interaction goes as : $$ \mathcal{M} \quad \propto \quad g_W \cdot(u, c, t) \left (\begin{array}{c} \bar u \\ \bar c \\ \bar t \end{array} \right ) \quad \propto \quad u\bar u + c \bar c + d \bar d,$$ i.e. no cross-generational coupling and hence no flavour mixing.

If the process were mediated by a $W^{\pm}$ boson, on the other hand, you'd have something like: $$ \mathcal{M} \quad \propto \quad \bar u\bar V_{ud} d + \bar u V_{us} s + ...,$$ i.e. cross-generational coupling and hence flavour mixing.
$V$ is the CKM matrix.

Hence, the lowest order diagrams for Flavour Changing Neutral Currents in the Standard Model are box or penguin diagrams: enter image description here

The penguin diagram gets its name because:

enter image description here


$\dagger$: There are some subtleties about the mass eigenstates $(d,s,b)$ not being the same eigenstates of the weak force $(d',s',b')$. The two bases are related by the CKM matrix. I ignore all of this, just to provide a qualitative picture.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ If neutral currents are prohibited, then, for example, how is the reaction $\Lambda^0 \rightarrow n + \pi^0$ realized? $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30 at 1:41
  • $\begingroup$ I believe your answer would be improved if you were to provide a citation for your quote (i.e., A "flavour changing current" is a process featuring the violation of quark flavour conservation. When mediated by a neutral particle such as the Z0 boson (or a photon), they do not entail a net charge exchange and are hence called "flavour changing neutral currents".) $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 30 at 15:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am not saying they are prohibited at all, just at the tree level. As per you second comment, I think my sentence is pretty self-explanatory but if you want it agrees with wikipedia here: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flavor-changing_neutral_current $\endgroup$ Commented Jul 31 at 16:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.