3
$\begingroup$

Background:

When learning about BCFW recursion I am shown the deformation equation:

$$\hat{p_1}=p_1 -zq \hspace{5mm}; \hspace{5mm} \hat{p_n} = p_n +zq$$

This deformation represents a $\langle1n]$ shift and $q$ is defined as $q=\lambda^\dot{\alpha}_1 \lambda^\alpha _n $

To check under which circumstances $\lim _{z \to \infty} \hat{A_n}(z)=0$, we consider deforming the 4-point MHV amplitude $A_4(1^- 2^- 3^+ 4^+)$.

Supposing we do a $\langle 1^- 2^-] $ shift then:

$$\hat{A_4}^{--}= \frac{\langle \hat{1}\hat{2}^3 \rangle}{\langle \hat{2}3 \rangle \langle 34\rangle \langle 4\hat{1} \rangle}$$

Problem:

In the notes, I am told to note that:

$$\langle \hat{1} \hat{2}\rangle= \left( \langle1|-z\langle 2|\right)|2\rangle =\langle 12\rangle $$

where $\langle 22\rangle=0 $ has been used.

How is this last equation true? I don't understand the middle term, how it was worked out or how it makes $\langle \hat{1} \hat{2} \rangle = \langle 12 \rangle$ I am pretty sure the first two equations are used in it but I don't see how.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The last equality follows from $\langle 22\rangle=0$. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Mar 24, 2020 at 22:28
  • $\begingroup$ I understand that that equality has been used butI don't understand still where does the equation in the middle of the bra-ket come from? (The $-z\langle 2|) $ part. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 24, 2020 at 22:38

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

When doing a complex shift in order to enact the BCFW transformation, we take, as you pointed out,

$$ \hat{p}_1 = p_1 - zq~,~~~~~ \hat{p}_2 = p_2 + zq$$

Choosing to do a $\langle 12]$ shift means we make a clever choice for $q$ and work with spinors, which gives $$\hat{p}_1 = |1\rangle|1] - z|2\rangle|1] = (|1\rangle - z|2\rangle)|1] = |\hat{1}\rangle|1].$$ The choice of $q$ is determined from $\hat{p}_1^2 = 0 = \hat{p}_2^2$.

This can be seen by considering $\hat{p}_i^2 \propto 2p_i\cdot q = \langle iq\rangle[iq]$: we have to choose either $q \propto |1\rangle[2|$ or $q \propto |2\rangle[1|$.

From the above, we have then that $|\hat{1}\rangle = |1\rangle - z|2\rangle$, which is the origin of the middle line. We should also note that $|\hat{2}\rangle = |2\rangle$, which you can check by shifting $p_2$ by the same $q$ as above.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ The expansion makes perfect sense to me, but I don't understand how q was chosen based on the momentum conservation rules, because if that was the case wouldn't it be that: $$\sum p_i = \sum \hat{p}_i = p_1 + p_2 = \hat{p}_1 + \hat{p}_2 $$ but then because the value of $zq$ changes sign in the equations: $$\hat{p_1}=p_1 -zq \hspace{5mm}; \hspace{5mm} \hat{p_n} = p_n +zq$$ don't they cancel out? And I don't understand how $(\hat{p}_i^2 = 0)$ helps either. I know this is based on $p_1 = |1\rangle|1]$ but could you help me understand the value of q? $\endgroup$
    – user256673
    Commented Apr 7, 2020 at 13:30
  • $\begingroup$ I've updated the answer. Momentum conservation just tells you how to shift the other particle (so that they cancel in momentum conservation, as you correctly pointed out) and $\hat{p}_i^2 = 0$ just tells you what $q$ has to be. $\endgroup$
    – Akoben
    Commented Apr 8, 2020 at 14:10

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.