3
$\begingroup$

Let our system is defined on some complete orthogonal basis $\{|n\rangle \}$. I know that in first quantization a projection operator is defined as $P_n=|n\rangle \langle n|$ which when applied on some arbitrary state $|\alpha\rangle=\sum_n a_n|n\rangle$ projects out the contribution of $|n\rangle$ to $|\alpha \rangle$. For example, let some operator, say velocity $\hat{v}$ is written as $\hat{v}=\sum_{nm} v_{nm} |n\rangle \langle m|$ with $ v_{nm}=\langle n|\hat{v}|m\rangle$. When we apply $P_n$ we get contribution of vector $|n\rangle$ in $\hat{v}$.

How we translate all this in second quantization formalism where we have field operators? Basically, I have an operator $\hat{v}$ given as in k-space $$ \hat{v} = \sum_k v_{aa} \hat{a}_k^+\hat{a}_k + v_{ab} \hat{a}_k^+\hat{b}_k + v_{ba} \hat{b}_k^+\hat{a}_k + v_{bb} \hat{b}_k^+\hat{b}_k $$ with $v_{ij}$ are some numbers. Now, I want to calculate the contribution of the $a_k^+$ operator only. So, I want to built a projection operator (similar to first quantizationformalism). How do I do that in second quantization?

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ what do you want this operator to do? $\endgroup$
    – Pavlo. B.
    Commented Apr 24, 2021 at 0:50
  • $\begingroup$ @Pavlo.B.let me elaborate on my question. So, there are two kinds of bosons ($a$ and $b$) in my system. The velocity operator given in field operators form has the contribution of both types of bosons (that's how I interpreted this expression, maybe I am wrong). I want to construct an operator that will project out the contribution of only one type of bosons from my full $\hat{v}$ operator. Am I making sense? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 24, 2021 at 1:00

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

You can get the 2nd quantization form (that means, the generalization of a single particle operator to the multiparticle system) using the following rule

$$A^{(mult)}=\sum_{nm} \langle n|A^{(single)}|m\rangle a^{\dagger}_n a_m $$

Therefore, the projection operator into a state $k$ that you're looking for is just $a^{\dagger}_k a_k$. Keep in mind that it's action on a symmetrized manybody state composed of single particle states $\psi_n$

$$ |\Psi \rangle=S\big(|\psi_1\rangle |\psi_2\rangle|\psi_3\rangle...\big)$$

is given by

$$ a^{\dagger}_k a_k |\Psi \rangle= S\big(\langle k|\psi_1\rangle |k\rangle |\psi_2\rangle|\psi_3\rangle...\big)+S\big(|\psi_1\rangle \langle k|\psi_2\rangle|k\rangle |\psi_3 \rangle...\big)+...$$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Wow. So elegant. Thanks. One more confusion: We can write my $\hat{v}$ operator in matrix form as $$\hat{v}=\phi^+ \begin{bmatrix} v_{aa}&v_{ab}\\v_{ba}&v_{bb} \end{bmatrix} \phi $$ where $\phi = [a_k, b_k]^T$. In $\phi$ basis we can represent our projection operator by matrix [[1,0,]; [0,0]]. Now, can we express the action of projection operator on $\hat{v}$ as $$\hat{v}=\phi^+ \begin{bmatrix} 1&0\\ 0&0\\ \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} v_{aa}&v_{ab}\\v_{ba}&v_{bb} \end{bmatrix}\phi $$? $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not quite sure what you mean by projection operator now. The result of your second equation is $a^{\dagger}_k a_k v_{aa}+a^{\dagger}_k b_k v_{ab}$, thats not really a projection I would say. $\endgroup$
    – curio
    Commented Apr 30, 2021 at 11:20
  • $\begingroup$ oh yes. you are right. it will be just $v_{aa} a_k^+ a_k$. thanks $\endgroup$ Commented May 1, 2021 at 2:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.