1
$\begingroup$

So I am reading Goenner's Spezielle Relativitästheorie and I am currently in chapter §4.9.1 Variation under Inclusion of Coordinates p. 129. So basically we have: $$\delta W_\zeta=\int d^4x' \mathcal{L}'(x')-\int d^4x \mathcal{L}(x).$$ Where the Variation results from the infinitesimal transformations through: $$x\rightarrow x'=x+\delta x=x+\zeta.$$ Now you can define a total variation: $$\delta u:=u'(x')-u(x)$$ and a local variation: $$\bar{\delta}u=u'(x)-u(x).$$ It follows that only the local variation commutes with the partial derivative. Now: $$d^4x'=(1+\zeta^\sigma_{,\sigma})d^4x$$ and $$\bar{\delta}\mathcal{L}=\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial u}\bar{\delta}u+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\alpha}}\bar{\delta}u_{,\alpha}.$$ Moreover: $$\mathcal{L}'(x')=\mathcal{L}'(x)+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}'}{\partial x}\delta x=\mathcal{L}'(x)+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x}\delta x.$$ Then the author writes that the variation can be written after using the commutation of the partial derivative with the local variation and partial integration as: $$\delta W_\zeta~=~\int d^4x\left[\bar\delta u \left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial u}-\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\mu}}\right)+\left[\mathcal{L}(x)\delta x^\alpha+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\alpha}}\left(\delta u - u_{,\beta}\delta x^\beta\right)\right]_{,\alpha}\right].$$

I tried to get there from the first equation, but didn't get anything close to this. Would really appreciate someone's help.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

1
$\begingroup$

Comments to the question (v3):

  1. OP's last formula is the standard expression $$ \delta W~=~ \int \! d^4x~ \left[ {\rm EL} \cdot\bar{\delta}u + d_{\mu} j^{\mu}\right], \tag{A} $$ for the variation of the action $W=\int\! d^4x~{\cal L}$ (= Wirkung in German). Here $$ j^{\mu} ~=~ p^{\mu} \cdot \bar{\delta}u + {\cal L} ~\delta x^{\mu}, \qquad p^{\mu}~:=~\frac{\partial {\cal L}}{\partial u_{,\mu}}, \tag{B} $$ is the bare Noether current, and ${\rm EL}$ is the Euler-Lagrange expression, so Goenner is certainly correct.

  2. Hints for the derivation of eq. (A):$$ \tag{C}\delta W~=~ \int \! d^4x~ \left[\delta{\cal L}+ {\cal L}~ d_{\mu}\delta x^{\mu} \right], $$ $$ \delta {\cal L}~=~\bar{\delta} {\cal L} + \delta x^{\mu} ~d_{\mu}{\cal L} \tag{D} ,$$ and $$\bar{\delta} {\cal L} ~=~ {\rm EL} \cdot\bar{\delta}u + d_{\mu}[p^{\mu} \cdot \bar{\delta}u] \tag{E} .$$

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Thanks for the hint. This is what I got so far:

$$\delta W=\int d^4x' \mathcal{L}'(x')-\int d^4x \mathcal{L}(x)$$

Now since $d^4x'=d^4x(1+(\delta x^\alpha)_{,\alpha})$ this equation reduces to:

$$\delta W=\int d^4x \mathcal{L}'(x')-\mathcal{L}(x)+(\delta x^\alpha)_{,\alpha}\mathcal{L'}(x')$$

Whic is just: $$\delta W=\int d^4x \delta\mathcal{L}+(\delta x^\alpha)_{,\alpha}(L+\delta L)$$ The second term in the second bracket can be ignored since it yields a second order term (as far as I know) so we get: $$\delta W=\int d^4x \delta\mathcal{L}+(\delta x^\alpha)_{,\alpha}L$$ Now since $\delta L = \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u}\delta u + \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\alpha}}\delta u_{,\alpha}+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x^\alpha}\delta x^{\alpha}$ This becomes: $$\delta W=\int d^4x \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u}\delta u + \frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\alpha}}\delta u_{,\alpha}+\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x^\alpha}\delta x^{\alpha}+(\delta x^\alpha)_{,\alpha}L$$ Now the last two terms can be termed together by reversing the product rule and using the reverse product rule on the second term yields: $$\delta W=\int d^4x \left(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u}-\left(\frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\mathcal{u}_{,\alpha}}\right)_{,\alpha}\right)\delta u+(\frac{\partial\mathcal{L}}{\partial u_{,\alpha}}+\delta x^\alpha\mathcal{L})_{,\alpha}$$ This is exactly what Goenner got except for that last term. Could somebody please point out what went wrong? Is it that first order approximation? thanks

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Comment to the answer (v1): Some bars are missing in various places. $\endgroup$
    – Qmechanic
    Commented Jan 21, 2016 at 13:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.