Does circularly polarized light pass through a linear polarizing filter, regardless of the orientation of such filter?
-
1$\begingroup$ Might be worth the experiment ;) $\endgroup$– Kyle KanosCommented Jun 11, 2015 at 0:42
-
$\begingroup$ Yes, I thought so too. I already bought the filters and then I didn't know where to get the circular polarized light source. $\endgroup$– Chris VCommented Jun 11, 2015 at 8:21
-
$\begingroup$ @ChrisV 3D Glasses! Well, the right kind fo 3D gogggles work as circular polarizers. $\endgroup$– ThrivethCommented Apr 3, 2016 at 5:07
-
$\begingroup$ @Thriveth Good point. Thanks. What I've noticed, though is that the glasses seem to be working as a circular filter on one (front) side and linear on the other side. Could this be the case? $\endgroup$– Chris VCommented Apr 3, 2016 at 7:09
-
$\begingroup$ @ChrisV As far as I understand, a circular polarizer is basically a linear polarizer with a quarter-wave plate slapped onto it. $\endgroup$– ThrivethCommented Apr 3, 2016 at 18:05
1 Answer
Yes it can pass, and will have the linear polarization of the filter. However, what they do in 3D movie goggles is to put in front of the linear polarizer a quarter wave filter. This polarizes the light in a specific direction, perpendicular relative to each eye.
This ensures that the circularly polarized light of each image passes only to one eye. Otherwise you will see a double image, because each linear polarizer will let light pass from both images (although with a different polarization) so it will be visible and you will no longer perceive a 3D image
-
$\begingroup$ Too bad. If it had kept the circular polarization, I would've had an idea for an application $\endgroup$– Chris VCommented Jun 11, 2015 at 8:26