10
$\begingroup$

My dad once told me that he read an article about some physicists wanting to shoot neutrinos through Earth as a way of communication. The explanation to why it would work being that at the atomic level there's mostly just "free space", so it would not hit anything.

Is there any way this could work?

$\endgroup$
1

2 Answers 2

9
$\begingroup$

The cosmic rays consist of all sorts of particles ranging from heavy protons to little to no mass neutrinos. There are trillions of trillions of neutrinos passing through the earth at any given time. While the proton, neutrons and other 'very social' particles get trapped by the many layers of the crust, these hermit neutrinos can stream through the matter unaffected (as a matter of fact, many light years of steel across). Neutrinos are extremely light and feebly interact with matter. We humans have already built detectors capable of detecting neutrinos despite the fact that the neutrinos are not social beings. Apart from catching the stray neutrinos in the cosmic rays, we have managed to detect neutrinos produced by smashing particles in accelerators.

$$$$ Building a Neutrino powered telephone

To build a communication system, you need three components:

  1. Transmitter - creating neutrinos
  2. Medium - neutrinos don't need a medium but they can travel through any medium
  3. Receiver - detecting neutrinos

Transmitter:

Producing neutrinos is relatively easier than detecting neutrinos. Smashing protons against a target will produce a beam of new particles. This is a very diverse beam of particles consisting of heavy and light, charged and uncharged (neutrons, protons, electrons, pions, neutrinos and what not). Some of these particles such as protons are unwanted particles which must be separated while some particles are useful such as pions which decay into muons and electrons producing neutrinos as side products.

$$\pi^+ \rightarrow \mu^+ + \nu_{\mu}$$ $$\pi^- \rightarrow \mu^- + \nu_{\mu}$$

The charged particles can be removed easily by surrounding the beam with a magnetic field. The charged particles will deflect in a curved path and hence can be separated. Neutrinos being uncharged are not affected by the magnetic field. The heavy particles can also be removed easily by using a thick steal-cement slab. Neutrinos feebly interact with matter and hence will easily make its way through the slab. Ultimately, you will be left with a beam consisting of neutrinos in majority.

enter image description here

Detector:

One of the detectors which is capable of detecting neutrinos today is the Super Kamiokande Neutrino Observatory. The detector is nearly a kilometer below the surface (so that particles which interact with matter get enough chance to do so). The test chamber is made up of steel and is in the shape of a cylinder. An array of super sensitive light detectors (photomultipliers) surround the sides of the test chamber. At the bottom of the test chamber, there are nearly 50,000 tons of water.

The theory behind the detector is that some of the neutrinos that pass through the water interact with matter and produce charged stray particles in the process which travel faster than the speed of light in water (speed of light in water is approximately around $0.75c$; physics works). This shows a phenomenon known as Cherenkov radiation which is similar to the sonic boom in sounds. This light is captured by the detectors and amplified to an extent which is measurable.

Conclusion:

Detecting neutrinos is very difficult and require big detectors. It isn't practical as of now to use neutrinos as a fast medium of communication. Of course, most of the neutrinos pass through the earth without interacting but it isn't a practically feasible method of communication as of today. Maybe some day in the future, we might actually build a working neutrino powered communication system.

There are lots of functioning neutrino detectors apart from Kamiokande. You might be interested to read about "Ice Cube", an array of downward-facing light detectors in the glacier over the South Pole which detects neutrinos that have traveled through the Earth from the northern celestial hemisphere. There are also working neutrino detectors at Gran Sasso in Italy, and at the Soudan mine in the US, which detect accelerator-produced neutrinos which travel through a substantial thickness of Earth's crust.

Source: rob (visible in comments of this answer)

$\endgroup$
5
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Good answer. Actually there are lots of functioning neutrino detectors apart from Kamiokande. You might be interested to read about "Ice Cube", an array of downward-facing light detectors in the glacier over the South Pole which detects neutrinos that have traveled through the Earth from the northern celestial hemisphere. There are also working neutrino detectors at Gran Sasso in Italy, and at the Soudan mine in the US, which detect accelerator-produced neutrinos which travel through a substantial thickness of Earth's crust. $\endgroup$
    – rob
    Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 16:25
  • $\begingroup$ Not sure I'd use 'massive' to describe a proton when there are iron atoms in cosmic rays. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented Feb 15, 2017 at 19:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You do not address how the message would be transmitted. I suppose the modulation would be by Morse code? interruptions on the signal? In a digital age not very efficient either. $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 5:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @annav I can come up with all sorts of methods. Use an electron neutrino as $1$ and muon neutrino as a $0$? How do we separate? I don't know. Moreover, muon neutrinos significantly outnumber the electron neutrionos. Or maybe use serial mode of communication, beam = 1, no beam = 0 in a single line. They tried using serial communication at Fermilab and they had an error of 1% and a baud rate of 0.1 bit/second and the distance the beam had to travel was just 240m of rock. I am not sure of any definitive method which would guarantee to work so I did not try to answer it. $\endgroup$
    – Yashas
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 5:44
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ The interactions are too weak for anything like that to work. Only the on off of the beam is controllable, no correlations. One might manipulate the numbers of neutrinos in the beam but it will be too rough for amplitude modulation. Neutrinos do not make a macroscopic wave the way photons do $\endgroup$
    – anna v
    Commented Feb 16, 2017 at 6:46
3
$\begingroup$

A nice description of generating neutrino beams and how they can be detected was already addressed in this thread.

But more to the question: Yes, people have already (intentionally) shot neutrino beams through cords of the earth and detected them (on purpose). Examples going back a few years: CERN to Gran Sasso (CNGS) or neutrino beams from Fermilab to the nearby Minerva detector about 1 km away.

The latter Fermilab experiment, circa 2012, was able to send the message "neutrino" to the Minerva detector using binary code. About one in ten billion neutrinos interact with the Minerva detector. By sending large bursts of systematically emitted neutrinos at Fermilab, a binary code can be generated that can send information. Granted, it isn't very efficient, but it has been done. Also, although neutrinos can pass through matter essentially unperturbed and could, in principle, send messages arbitrarily far through any obstacle, beams of neutrinos aren't particularly well collimated. As a result, for large distances, the neutrino flux at the source would have to be very high in order to detect a sufficient number to receive a message, even for the world's most sensitive detectors.

CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso (CNGS)

Neutrino Particle Communications

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.