Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
The study of physical properties of condensed phases of matter, including solids and liquids.
0
votes
Why is there no electric field in the Hamiltonian for the quantum Hall effect?
There is an electric field when you measure the Hall conductance. The electric field is not essential for the formation of the quantum Hall state itself: it is just a probe, and the Hall conductance i …
1
vote
Accepted
How is the ground state of an insulator related to a confined state and a localized state?
Confinement is usually discussed in the context of gauge theories. Here you do not have any specific information about the properties of the insulator, so it is not clear why you put "confined states" …
2
votes
Which Symmetry class and what kind of topological invariant for $2D -p+ip$?
I don't know what is a "p+ip insulator". There is indeed p+ip superconductor, which belongs to the class D and characterized by an integer invariant, the Chern number.
0
votes
Eigenvalue of Hamiltonian under gauge transform of Bloch state
The interaction term is not invariant under the gauge transformation. $b_k\rightarrow e^{i\theta_k}b_k$ is only a symmetry for the non-interacting Hamiltonian $H=\sum_k E(k)b_k^\dagger b_k$.
4
votes
Accepted
Vacuum state in particle hole symmetric Hamiltonian
Here is a perhaps more direct argument: I suppose you define $|0\rangle$ to be the state with no fermion occupation, so it means that $n_I=\psi_I^\dagger\psi_I=0$ on this state. Define $N=\sum_I n_I$. …
1
vote
What is the importance of the biquadratic interaction in the AKLT model?
You don't need the biquadratic interaction to realize the Haldane phase. The Heisenberg spin-1 chain already does the job. Adding the biquadratic term allows one to have a parent Hamiltonian for the e …
7
votes
Ground state of AKLT chain invariant under time-reversal?
There is certainly a way to preserve the time-reversal symmetry with open boundary conditions: just put the two edge spins into a singlet state. You may say that this is cheating, since essentially we …
4
votes
Accepted
Questions on gapless edge excitations in symmetry-protected topological state
Q1: Consider the example of a Haldane phase protected by time-reversal symmetry. There is a spin-1/2 on the edge, and to polarize it (so the system is gapped and the ground state is unique) one must b …
3
votes
Interacting fermionic SPT phases in 2d with time-reversal symmetry
The non-interacting classification was obtained in the seminal "periodic table" papers by Kitaev and Ryu/Snyder/Furusaki/Ludwig. The interacting classification of 2D fermionic SPT phases with time-rev …
1
vote
Tight binding in the limit of large system size
To obtain the energy gap in the thermodynamic limit, one should take $N\rightarrow\infty, V\rightarrow\infty$ where $N$ is the number of atoms and $V$ the system size, but hold $N/V$ (i.e. density) fi …
4
votes
Accepted
Topological superconductors: what is the role of spin-orbit coupling? Are there topological ...
It depends on what kind of pairing you are willing to include in the Hamiltonian. If only s-wave singlet pairing is present, and there is no spin-orbit coupling, the Hamiltonian has an additional $\ma …
1
vote
Accepted
Why is there longitudinal response in a partially-filled Landau level?
Your argument is correct, in fact you can use it to show that the Hall conductivity is set by the density. However, there is an underlying assumption when you apply Galilean transformation, that is tr …
2
votes
Accepted
Why is the plaquette operator in the string-net model a projection operator?
The relevant part of the sum as
$\sum_{k^*,s_1,s_2}\delta_{k^*,s_1s_2}d_{s_1}d_{s_2}B^k_P$
Let me assume that the fusion category has no multiplicities, so $N_{ab}^c=0,1$, which I think Levin and We …
1
vote
Accepted
Angular momentum partial components of a $k$-dependent pairing potential
Just focusing on the $\cos^l\theta$ term is probably not going to get you anywhere, since $\cos^l\theta$, being a completely analytical function, is by no means singular (and following your argument y …
2
votes
Accepted
Berry phase in the toric code model and 2D chiral $p$-wave superconductors
For 2D chiral p-wave, it has been shown that the Berry phase contribution vanishes and therefore the exchange statistics is entirely given by the monodromy. This was done in http://arxiv.org/abs/cond- …