Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
1 vote
0 answers
51 views

How to know the minimal coupling and how to find eigenvalues of arbitrary representations?

I'm dealing with the following problem. In a $ SU(3)_L\times U(1)_X$ model, the scalar representation content accomodates the following anti-sextet $$ S \equiv \begin{pmatrix} \sigma_1^0 & \frac{...
GaloisFan's user avatar
  • 1,782
4 votes
0 answers
75 views

Zee Chapter VII.5: Can the fermion $10$ be the composite of fermion $5^*$?

In Zee Chapter VII.5 QFT book: He showed that the standard model fermions form $5^*$ and $10$ representations of $SU(5)$: $$ 5^* \oplus 10. $$ In particular, the $10$ is the anti-symmetric matrix ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
99 views

Figure of $SO(10)$ grand unified theory in $E_6$ from Wikipedia

In this figure from Wikipedia, it shows that the representations of particles of $SO(10)$ grand unified theory, their patterns of charges for particles in the $SO(10)$ model, rotated to show the ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
116 views

Figure of $SO(10)$ grand unified theory from Wikipedia

In this Figure from Wikipedia, it shows that the representations of particles of $SO(10)$ grand unified theory, representations as numbers labeled in several axes. Descriptions: The patterns of weak ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
40 views

$ (5^* \times 5^*)_{asym}={10}$ in A. Zee's book p.409 versus PDG Sec.114

What is the mathematical or physical way to understand why the 4th and 5th components in the Georgi Galshow SU(5) model has the SU(2) doublet $(1,2,-1/2)$: $$ \begin{pmatrix} \nu\\e \end{pmatrix} $$ ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
5 votes
0 answers
160 views

$\rm SO(10)$ grand unified model restores the parity symmetry lost in $\rm SU(5)$ model

It is said in Lie Algebras in Particle Physics 2ed - From Isospin to Unified Theories (Georgi, 1999) p.285, Georgi said that $\rm SO(10)$ grand unified model restores the parity symmetry that was ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
1 vote
0 answers
37 views

Light composite fermion as a bound state formed by $SU(4)$ gauge force attractions

In this paper https://inspirehep.net/literature/152400, in eq.(3.4), it claims that the MAC (most attractive channel) in $SU(4)$ gauge theory will attract fermions in $[1]_4$ and fermions in $[3]_4$ ...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
196 views

Why isn't the triplet representation of $SU(2)$ symmetric?

By the Young Tableaux construction, a triplet of $SU(2)$ (diagramatically, two boxes side by side) is supposed to be a two indices symmetric tensor. However, one of the most known and minimal ...
GaloisFan's user avatar
  • 1,782
2 votes
0 answers
136 views

Lectures by Susskind versus Zee on the ${\rm SU}(5)$ grand unified theory notations

I was comparing two lectures about ${\rm SU}(5)$ grand unified theory. a lecture of Susskind He showed how to write $$ (5 \times 5)_{asym}=\bar{10} $$ as a lecture of Zee showed how to write $$ (\...
ann marie cœur's user avatar
3 votes
0 answers
32 views

Neutrino flavor models from irreducible representations of discrete groups [duplicate]

I am starting ph.D in neutrino physics-ph. I've read some papers on discrete symmetries and neutrino mass models. Neutrino flavor models are built using irreducible representations of discrete groups, ...
Kishan Mayengbam's user avatar
23 votes
4 answers
3k views

Why do all fields in a QFT transform like *irreducible* representations of some group?

Emphasis is on the irreducible. I get what's special about them. But is there some principle that I'm missing, that says it can only be irreducible representations? Or is it just 'more beautiful' and ...
BeneIT's user avatar
  • 333
0 votes
1 answer
60 views

How do we know the group property of a new particle?

Suppose I have a particle $W'$ which can decay into $\mu$ and $\nu_{\mu}$ and $e$ and $\nu_{e}$. Suppose we know such new gauge bosons come from some additional gauge group added to the Standard ...
Universe Maintainer's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
237 views

Constraints on RH component of fermion triplet under $SU(2)_L$

Consider a fermion $\chi$ whose left-handed part is in a triplet representation of $SU(2)_L$: $$ \chi_{L} = (\chi^1,\chi^2,\chi^3)_L^{\ \ \text{T}}. $$ The charged current of $\chi_L$ (i.e. its ...
Jasmeru's user avatar
  • 1,168
2 votes
1 answer
276 views

Can $E_8 \times E_8$ contain the standard model?

I know $E_8$ by itself can't be gauge group because it has no complex representation and so would not be chiral. But assuming the existence of mirror matter which also would have $E_8$ gauge group ...
user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
3k views

Given the transformation of $SU(2)$ triplet $\vec{\phi}$ how to find the transformation of ${\Phi}\equiv\vec{\phi}\cdot\vec{\tau}$?

Given the transformation of a $SU(2)$ triplet $\vec\phi$ $$\phi\to \exp{(-i\vec{T}\cdot\vec{\theta})}~\vec\phi\tag{1}$$ (in the question here by @physicslover) how does obtain the transformation of $\...
SRS's user avatar
  • 27.2k
9 votes
1 answer
2k views

How to decompose the representation of $\rm SU(5)$?

This question comes from Srednicki's textbook "Quantum Field Theory". On pages 514-515, it states: Under the unbroken $\rm SU(3)\times SU(2) \times U(1)$ subgroup, the $5$ representation of ...
Shen's user avatar
  • 1,673
4 votes
0 answers
1k views

What is the meaning of SU(2) triplet scalar field? [closed]

The following is an about a Left-Right Symmetric model. $SU(2)\otimes SU(2)$ $(2\otimes 2=3\oplus 1)$ will generate a triplet, which in Left-Right Symmetric model is $$\vec{\Delta}=\begin{pmatrix}\...
Love Grover's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
467 views

Correct Yukawa Term with a SU(2) Higgs Triplet?

Given $SU(2)$ doublet fermions $\Psi^1$ and $\Psi^2$ and a $SU(2)$ triplet Higgs $H$, how does the correct Yukawa term look like in tensor notation? Schematically, we have $$ 2 \otimes 2 \otimes 3 \...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
3 votes
0 answers
211 views

What does complexification mean for our particles in physics?

As gauge group let's consider the popular $SO(10)$ group. The fundamental representation $\pi$ of the corresponding Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}(10)$ is $10$ dimensional $$ \pi: \mathfrak{so}(10) \...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
0 votes
0 answers
77 views

Why is the tensor product $n \otimes n = 1$ for $SO(n)$ not the usual scalar product?

For concreteness let's consider $SO(4)$. The quantum numbers for the four states in the fundamental representations are (schematically) $$ (1, 1) ,(-1, 1) ,(1, -1) ,(-1, -1 )$$ thus $$ 4= \...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
3 votes
1 answer
203 views

How to find the remaining subgroup after some linear combination of Higgs fields gets a VEV?

This is a follow-up question to this question. How can I compute which generators remain unbroken when a linear combination of Higgs fields $a \Phi_1+ b\Phi_2$ get a vev? If I compute the unbroken ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
3 votes
1 answer
201 views

Symmetry breaking to a special subalgebra?

This is a follow-up to my question here. For regular subalgebras of some group's Lie algebra the root system of the subalgebra is a subset of the root system of the original's group algebra. In other ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
1 vote
1 answer
410 views

How to find the remaining subgroup after some Higgs field gets a VEV?

Say we have a group $G$ and a set of Higgs fields in a representation $R$ of $G$. One of the Higgs fields in $R$ gets a VEV, how can I determine the remaining subgroup after this symmetry breaking? ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
5 votes
2 answers
751 views

Why do decompositons like $16 \otimes 16 = 10 \oplus 120 \oplus 126$ tell us which Higgs representations we can use?

EDIT: I found an answer, which I do not understand: In Gürsey - Symmetry breaking patterns in E6 he writes: " Because of Fermi-Dirac statistics of fermions they must occur in the symmetric part of ...
jak's user avatar
  • 10.3k
5 votes
1 answer
465 views

Higgs Mechanism

In Higgs mechanism, we take the combination of LH $SU(2)$ doublet and RH singlet along with Higgs doublet so that the overall weak hypercharge and weak isospin is zero to be $SU(2) \times U(1)$ ...
rafi_sazzad's user avatar