Skip to main content

All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
0 votes
1 answer
84 views

Odd notation $\stackrel{\leftarrow}{\nabla}$ for a gradient

I've tried working out the Heisenberg EOM for the 4-current operator. Two very beautiful articles (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.042107, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.012508) present this result, but I have not ...
Sphyr's user avatar
  • 51
0 votes
0 answers
28 views

Evaluating the commutator of derivative and position [duplicate]

In Zettili's book on quantum, the fully worked problem 2.6 asks to show $$ \hat{A} = i(\hat{X}^2+1)\frac{d}{dx} + i\hat{X}. $$ Is Hermitian. Where $\hat{X}$ is the position operator. I took the ...
Jacob Atkinson's user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
288 views

Question on how to make product rule for differentiation consistent with operators? [duplicate]

By the product rule for differentiation:$$\frac{\partial(\hat A\psi)}{\partial x}=\left(\frac{\partial\hat A}{\partial x}\right)\psi+\hat A\left(\frac{\partial\psi}{\partial x}\right)\tag{1}$$ Where $\...
a Fish in Dirac Sea's user avatar
3 votes
2 answers
267 views

What does $\dot x$ mean as an operator in quantum mechanics?

I've been looking at a paper titled "Feynman's proof of the Maxwell Equations" by Freeman Dyson (American Journal of Physics 58, 209 (1990); https://doi.org/10.1119/1.16188) and I'm confused ...
SpinEcho's user avatar
0 votes
2 answers
123 views

Ambiguity in Notation for Operators in Quantum Mechanics

Let's say I am trying to find the commutator of operators $\mathbf{A}$ and $\mathbf{B}$, and I get $$[\mathbf{A},\mathbf{B}]=\nabla^2 f(x,y,z).\tag{0}$$ There seems to be some ambiguity here. In ...
Just Some Old Man's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
115 views

Schrödinger equation: $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$ and $\frac{d}{dt}$ [duplicate]

I have seen two different forms of Schrödinger equation: $$i\hbar\frac{\partial|\psi(t)\rangle}{\partial t}=\hat{H}|\psi(t)\rangle$$ and $$i\hbar\frac{d|\psi(t)\rangle}{d t}=\hat{H}|\psi(t)\rangle.$$ ...
TaeNyFan's user avatar
  • 4,276
-1 votes
1 answer
650 views

What do some of the symbols in the Schrodinger Equation mean? [closed]

The Time Dependent Schrodinger Equation has the form $$i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}\Psi=-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\left(\nabla^2+V\right)\Psi$$ and the Time Independent Schrodinger Equation has the ...
Anders Gustafson's user avatar
1 vote
4 answers
420 views

What do $\nabla$ and $\frac{d }{d t}$ mean when they are by themselves?

In QM and QFT, I have seen some equations where they have just the derivative and/or the gradient without specifying what it is acting on. Taken from wiki. This does not make sense to me since I ...
Tachyon's user avatar
  • 2,042
7 votes
2 answers
652 views

Issue in deriving Ehrenfest's theorem

Working in Schrodinger picture, while deriving Ehrenfest's theorem, we go - $$ \frac{d}{d t}\langle A\rangle=\frac{d}{d t}\langle\psi|\hat{A}| \psi\rangle $$ $A$ is an operator. Expanding RHS- $$ \...
aneet kumar's user avatar
2 votes
3 answers
109 views

Small doubt on derivatives acting on kets/bras

I have a quick, silly question. If $\psi(x):=\langle x|\psi\rangle$, does the bra $\langle x|$ 'go through' the $\partial_x$ operator, as in $$\langle x|\partial_x|\psi\rangle=\partial_x\psi(x) \quad ?...
Brown Hole's user avatar
8 votes
1 answer
999 views

Two different versions of Schrödinger's equation - are they equivalent?

For simplicity, let's look at the case of one particle in one dimension. We usually think of the wave function as a function \begin{align} \Psi\colon\mathbb R\times[0,\infty[&\to\mathbb C\\ (x,t)&...
Filippo's user avatar
  • 1,911
14 votes
3 answers
1k views

What is meant by a partial derivative of a ket?

In my QM book I often see partial derivatives mixed with kets, like $$ \frac{\partial}{\partial a} |\psi \rangle $$ where $a \in \{x, y, z\}$. Here I'm assuming that $| \psi \rangle \in \mathbb{C}^n$ ...
George's user avatar
  • 337
2 votes
1 answer
913 views

Expectation value of time derivative of operator vs. time derivative after operator

Problem 3.18 in Griffiths's Introduction to Quantum Mechanics (3rd ed.) asks to apply the generalised Ehrenfest theorem to operators like the Hamiltonian and momentum operator. The purpose of the ...
Mew's user avatar
  • 357
4 votes
3 answers
263 views

What does it mean "differentiation with respect to the coordinates of particle 1 or 2"?

I was reading Introduction to Quantum Mechanics by Griffiths. In Chapter 5, Identical Particles, I came across the notation $\nabla_1$ and $\nabla_2$. Griffiths writes that it means "differentiation ...
Neelkanth Rawat's user avatar
-1 votes
1 answer
58 views

Expectation of partial time derivatives of $x$ in QM

In Ehrenfest theorem we know that $$m\frac{d\left< x\right>}{dt}=\left< p\right>+m\left<\frac{\partial x}{\partial t}\right>.$$ So how can I exactly calculate a specific $\left<\...
user242494's user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
425 views

Question about commutators acting on wavefunctions

Consider a commutator acting on a 1D wavefunction: $$[\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{d}{dx},x]\psi(x)=(\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{d}{dx}x-x\frac{\hbar}{i} \frac{d}{dx})\psi(x).$$ Now does this mean $\frac{\hbar}{...
TaeNyFan's user avatar
  • 4,276
0 votes
1 answer
105 views

Operator $A$ only act on the neighboured state or operator but not the entire expression?

In state vector formalism $A|\psi(x)><u(x)|=(A|\psi(x)>)<u(x)|$, where $A$ only act on $|\psi(x)>$ However, in terms of wave formalism, suppose $A$ is the well known $\frac{d}{dx}$. ...
ShoutOutAndCalculate's user avatar
4 votes
2 answers
758 views

Ordinary vs. partial derivatives of kets and observables in Dirac formalism

I'm a bit confused as to when ordinary and partial derivatives are used in the Dirac formalism. In the Schrödinger equation, for instance, Griffiths [3.85] uses ordinary derivatives: $$ i \hbar \...
Danny's user avatar
  • 380
0 votes
2 answers
2k views

Gradient of a wave function, notational confusion

I'm reading from "Quantum Physics for Dummies", by Steven Holzner. In chapter two, entitled "Entering the Matrix: Welcome to State Vectors", the author introduces the notation for a gradient of a wave ...
mcchucklezz's user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
1k views

Partial Derivative and Dirac Notation [duplicate]

Does the partial derivative of $\langle x'|\alpha\rangle$ with respect to $x'$ equal $|\alpha\rangle$? Why? Note: $|\alpha\rangle$ is an arbitrary ket, $x'$ is an eigenvalue, and $\langle x'|$ is an ...
Math12345's user avatar
  • 243
0 votes
1 answer
187 views

Density operator as a function of time

Given the density operator $\rho = \sum_iw_i | \alpha^{i} \rangle \langle \alpha^{i}|$, how does the density operator change with time. Apparently I should get $$i \hbar \frac{\partial \rho}{\partial ...
Alex's user avatar
  • 1,053
1 vote
3 answers
301 views

Why is $\frac{d^2}{dx^2}=\left(\frac{d}{dx}\right)^2$ justified in the equation for the square of the momentum operator?

The square of the momentum operator $\hat p$ from the time independent Schrödinger equation is $$\hat p^2=-\hbar^2\frac{d^2}{dx^2}\tag{1}$$ in the one dimensional case. So if we solve this equation ...
BLAZE's user avatar
  • 2,520
18 votes
2 answers
16k views

Do derivatives of operators act on the operator itself or are they "added to the tail" of operators?

How do derivatives of operators work? Do they act on the terms in the derivative or do they just get "added to the tail"? Is there a conceptual way to understand this? For example: say you had the ...
Mike Flynn's user avatar
  • 1,156
1 vote
2 answers
319 views

Notation for differential operators and wave function math

I know that $[\frac {d^2}{dx^2}]\psi$ is $\frac {d^2\psi}{dx^2}$ but what about this one $[\frac {d^2\psi}{dx^2}]\psi^*$? Is it this like $\frac {d^2\psi\psi^*}{dx^2}$ or this like $\frac {\psi^*d^2\...
rabi's user avatar
  • 11