-1
$\begingroup$

I am an independent researcher and I am working on a theory that could theoretically determine a temperature value for a single particle. With new equations I've derived, predicts the values in these three graphs. The equations are a function of total ionization energy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ionization_energies_of_the_elements_(data_page) By summing all the individual ionization energies together yields the results in these graphs.

The equation that is used to determine the temperature values in the middle graph, is also used to derive the values in the first, and the third graph. Essentially, by knowing the temperature of a nucleus, one could know the thermal velocity of a nucleus and its kinetic energy. Note that the third graph isn't about binding energies of the nucleons, but rather an effective kinetic energy of the nucleus caused by the thermal energy.

I am asking if these results can be verified against experimental data? Only thing I am sure of, is that these values are not overexaggerated, and they could resemble reality.

enter image description here

Improve this question
New contributor
Kristo is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering. Check out our Code of Conduct.
$\endgroup$
3
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is largely what I'd argued against doing in the meta post you made: reposting the same graphs and asking the same question. You need to edit the post to describe what it is you've done, why these graphs look the way they look, etc. $\endgroup$
    – Kyle Kanos
    Commented 2 days ago
  • $\begingroup$ If your only question is "I am asking if these results can be verified against experimental data?", without any explanation on how the graphs were actually generated and the underlying model, this question can be summed up as "where can I get experimental data concerning X". So I don't see a reason for all the preamble about independent research, etc. Secondly, I don't see a reason to actually include the graphs, because no one will do the work for you, of comparing it with experimental data. $\endgroup$
    – Amit
    Commented yesterday
  • $\begingroup$ Yeah that's a good point. I guess I was too naive to think about that there were existing data about this and someone would know. $\endgroup$
    – Kristo
    Commented yesterday

0

Reset to default

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.