1
$\begingroup$

Generally, the coriolis acceleration is given as

$-2\vec{\Omega}\times\vec{v}$

Just as $\vec{\Omega}$ or $\vec{v}$, the coriolis acceleration can be rewritten in local cartesian coordinates (edited):

$-(2\omega\Omega\cos{\Theta}-2v\Omega\sin{\Theta}, 2u\Omega\sin{\Theta}, -2u\Omega\cos{\Theta})$

with $\vec{\Omega}=(0,\Omega\cos{\Theta},\Omega\sin{\Theta})$

For the coordinate system see Wikipedia image:

enter image description here

It's not easy to understand ... Why does $u$, the x-component of the velocity, appear in the second and third component of the coriolis acceleration? Could you eventually help me?

$\endgroup$
2
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You write that the components of a vector are themselves vectors. Obviously typos. $\endgroup$
    – Gec
    Commented Feb 2 at 10:29
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, you are right! See edit. $\endgroup$
    – Sylvia
    Commented Feb 2 at 11:56

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I think your question needs further clarification, if you are interested in the mathematical description, then the reason for $u$ to appear in the second and third component of the resulting vector is a matter of the cross product's definition only.

In your case it is defined as:

$$ \vec{a} \times \vec{b} = \left( \begin{array}{c} a_2b_3 - a_3b_2\\ a_3b_1 - a_1 b_3\\ a_1b_2 - a_2 b_1\\ \end{array} \right)$$

If you now replace $\vec{b}$ with $\vec{v}$, you will have $b_1 = u$, $b_2=v$ and $b_3=\omega$. From here it is easy to see why $u$ appears in the second and third component of the resulting vector.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I see. That was all I was looking for. Thank you! $\endgroup$
    – Sylvia
    Commented Feb 2 at 12:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.